[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v4] lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list
Add a KUnit test for the kernel doubly linked list implementation in include/linux/list.h
Each test case (list_test_x) is focused on testing the behaviour of the list function/macro 'x'. None of the tests pass invalid lists to these macros, and so should behave identically with DEBUG_LIST enabled and disabled.
Note that, at present, it only tests the list_ types (not the singly-linked hlist_), and does not yet test all of the list_for_each_entry* macros (and some related things like list_prepare_entry).
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com ---
The changes from v3 are mostly to do with naming: - The Kconfig entry has been renamed from LIST_TEST to LIST_KUNIT_TEST, which matches the SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST entry, - The Kconfig description was updated to better match other KUnit tests, specifying that the test is not intended for use in a production kernel. A now-redundant mention of the test running a boot was removed. - The MAINTAINERS entry refers to a "KUNIT TEST" rather than a "UNIT TEST" - The module name has changed from "list-test" to "list-kunit-test".
Earlier versions of the test can be found: v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191016215707.95317-1-davidgow@goog... v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191010185631.26541-1-davidgow@goog... v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191007213633.92565-1-davidgow@goog...
MAINTAINERS | 5 + lib/Kconfig.debug | 18 ++ lib/Makefile | 3 + lib/list-test.c | 740 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 766 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/list-test.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 7ef985e01457..7ced1b69a3d3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -9504,6 +9504,11 @@ F: Documentation/misc-devices/lis3lv02d.rst F: drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/ F: drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c
+LIST KUNIT TEST +M: David Gow davidgow@google.com +S: Maintained +F: lib/list-test.c + LIVE PATCHING M: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com M: Jiri Kosina jikos@kernel.org diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index a3017a5dadcd..7991b78eb1f3 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -1961,6 +1961,24 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST
If unsure, say N.
+config LIST_KUNIT_TEST + bool "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures" + depends on KUNIT + help + This builds the linked list KUnit test suite. + It tests that the API and basic functionality of the list_head type + and associated macros. + + KUnit tests run during boot and output the results to the debug log + in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). Only useful for kernel devs + running the KUnit test harness, and not intended for inclusion into a + production build. + + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. + config TEST_UDELAY tristate "udelay test driver" help diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index bba1fd5485f7..890e581d00c4 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -292,3 +292,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_MULDI3) += muldi3.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_CMPDI2) += cmpdi2.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_UCMPDI2) += ucmpdi2.o obj-$(CONFIG_OBJAGG) += objagg.o + +# KUnit tests +obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..75ba3ddac959 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/list-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,740 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for the Kernel Linked-list structures. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: David Gow davidgow@google.com + */ +#include <kunit/test.h> + +#include <linux/list.h> + +struct list_test_struct { + int data; + struct list_head list; +}; + +static void list_test_list_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Test the different ways of initialising a list. */ + struct list_head list1 = LIST_HEAD_INIT(list1); + struct list_head list2; + LIST_HEAD(list3); + struct list_head *list4; + struct list_head *list5; + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list2); + + list4 = kzalloc(sizeof(*list4), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, list4); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list4); + + list5 = kmalloc(sizeof(*list5), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, list5); + memset(list5, 0xFF, sizeof(*list5)); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list5); + + /* list_empty_careful() checks both next and prev. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list3)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(list4)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(list5)); + + kfree(list4); + kfree(list5); +} + +static void list_test_list_add(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add(&a, &list); + list_add(&b, &list); + + /* should be [list] -> b -> a */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.next, &a); +} + +static void list_test_list_add_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* should be [list] -> a -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a.next, &b); +} + +static void list_test_list_del(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_del(&a); + + /* now: [list] -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); +} + +static void list_test_list_replace(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a_old, a_new, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a_old, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a_old -> b */ + list_replace(&a_old, &a_new); + + /* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new); +} + +static void list_test_list_replace_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a_old, a_new, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a_old, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a_old -> b */ + list_replace_init(&a_old, &a_new); + + /* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new); + + /* check a_old is empty (initialized) */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a_old)); +} + +static void list_test_list_swap(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_swap(&a, &b); + + /* after: [list] -> b -> a */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, list.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, list.prev); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, b.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &list, b.prev); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &list, a.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, a.prev); +} + +static void list_test_list_del_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_del_init(&a); + /* after: [list] -> b, a initialised */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a)); +} + +static void list_test_list_move(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + list_add_tail(&b, &list2); + + /* before: [list1] -> a, [list2] -> b */ + list_move(&a, &list2); + /* after: [list1] empty, [list2] -> a -> b */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list1)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, list2.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, a.next); +} + +static void list_test_list_move_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + list_add_tail(&b, &list2); + + /* before: [list1] -> a, [list2] -> b */ + list_move_tail(&a, &list2); + /* after: [list1] empty, [list2] -> b -> a */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list1)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, list2.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, b.next); +} + +static void list_test_list_bulk_move_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b, c, d, x, y; + struct list_head *list1_values[] = { &x, &b, &c, &y }; + struct list_head *list2_values[] = { &a, &d }; + struct list_head *ptr; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&x, &list1); + list_add_tail(&y, &list1); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list2); + list_add_tail(&b, &list2); + list_add_tail(&c, &list2); + list_add_tail(&d, &list2); + + /* before: [list1] -> x -> y, [list2] -> a -> b -> c -> d */ + list_bulk_move_tail(&y, &b, &c); + /* after: [list1] -> x -> b -> c -> y, [list2] -> a -> d */ + + list_for_each(ptr, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ptr, list1_values[i]); + i++; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 4); + i = 0; + list_for_each(ptr, &list2) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ptr, list2_values[i]); + i++; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2); +} + +static void list_test_list_is_first(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_first(&a, &list)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_first(&b, &list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_is_last(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_last(&a, &list)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_last(&b, &list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_empty(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_empty(&list1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_empty_careful(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* This test doesn't check correctness under concurrent access */ + struct list_head a; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_empty_careful(&list1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_rotate_left(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_rotate_left(&list); + /* after: [list] -> b -> a */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.next, &a); +} + +static void list_test_list_rotate_to_front(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b, c, d; + struct list_head *list_values[] = { &c, &d, &a, &b }; + struct list_head *ptr; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + list_add_tail(&c, &list); + list_add_tail(&d, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b -> c -> d */ + list_rotate_to_front(&c, &list); + /* after: [list] -> c -> d -> a -> b */ + + list_for_each(ptr, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ptr, list_values[i]); + i++; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 4); +} + +static void list_test_list_is_singular(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + /* [list] empty */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_singular(&list)); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + + /* [list] -> a */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_singular(&list)); + + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* [list] -> a -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_singular(&list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_cut_position(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list1); + + /* before: [list1] -> entries[0] -> entries[1] -> entries[2] */ + list_cut_position(&list2, &list1, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list2] -> entries[0] -> entries[1], [list1] -> entries[2] */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list2) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2); + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } +} + +static void list_test_list_cut_before(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list1); + + /* before: [list1] -> entries[0] -> entries[1] -> entries[2] */ + list_cut_before(&list2, &list1, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list2] -> entries[0], [list1] -> entries[1] -> entries[2] */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list2) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1); + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } +} + +static void list_test_list_splice(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice(&list2, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] uninit */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); +} + +static void list_test_list_splice_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice_tail(&list2, &entries[4]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] uninit */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); +} + +static void list_test_list_splice_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice_init(&list2, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] empty */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_splice_tail_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice_tail_init(&list2, &entries[4]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] empty */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct, list_entry(&(test_struct.list), struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_first_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct1, list_first_entry(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_last_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct2, list_last_entry(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_first_entry_or_null(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_first_entry_or_null(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct1, list_first_entry_or_null(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_next_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct2, list_next_entry(&test_struct1, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_prev_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct1, list_prev_entry(&test_struct2, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each(cur, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 3); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_prev(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 2; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each_prev(cur, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i--; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, -1); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur, *n; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each_safe(cur, n, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + list_del(&entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_prev_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur, *n; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 2; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each_prev_safe(cur, n, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + list_del(&entries[i]); + i--; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, -1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct entries[5], *cur; + static LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i) { + entries[i].data = i; + list_add_tail(&entries[i].list, &list); + } + + i = 0; + + list_for_each_entry(cur, &list, list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, cur->data, i); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_entry_reverse(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct entries[5], *cur; + static LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i) { + entries[i].data = i; + list_add_tail(&entries[i].list, &list); + } + + i = 4; + + list_for_each_entry_reverse(cur, &list, list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, cur->data, i); + i--; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, -1); +} + +static struct kunit_case list_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_add), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_add_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_del), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_replace), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_replace_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_swap), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_del_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_bulk_move_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_first), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_last), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_empty), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_empty_careful), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_rotate_left), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_rotate_to_front), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_singular), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_cut_position), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_cut_before), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice_tail_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_first_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_last_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_first_entry_or_null), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_next_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_prev_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_prev), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_safe), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_prev_safe), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_entry_reverse), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite list_test_module = { + .name = "list-kunit-test", + .test_cases = list_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(list_test_module);
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:49PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
Add a KUnit test for the kernel doubly linked list implementation in include/linux/list.h
Each test case (list_test_x) is focused on testing the behaviour of the list function/macro 'x'. None of the tests pass invalid lists to these macros, and so should behave identically with DEBUG_LIST enabled and disabled.
Note that, at present, it only tests the list_ types (not the singly-linked hlist_), and does not yet test all of the list_for_each_entry* macros (and some related things like list_prepare_entry).
Signed-off-by: David Gow davidgow@google.com
The changes from v3 are mostly to do with naming:
- The Kconfig entry has been renamed from LIST_TEST to LIST_KUNIT_TEST, which matches the SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST entry,
- The Kconfig description was updated to better match other KUnit tests, specifying that the test is not intended for use in a production kernel. A now-redundant mention of the test running a boot was removed.
- The MAINTAINERS entry refers to a "KUNIT TEST" rather than a "UNIT TEST"
- The module name has changed from "list-test" to "list-kunit-test".
Earlier versions of the test can be found: v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191016215707.95317-1-davidgow@goog... v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191010185631.26541-1-davidgow@goog... v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20191007213633.92565-1-davidgow@goog...
MAINTAINERS | 5 + lib/Kconfig.debug | 18 ++ lib/Makefile | 3 + lib/list-test.c | 740 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 766 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/list-test.c
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 7ef985e01457..7ced1b69a3d3 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -9504,6 +9504,11 @@ F: Documentation/misc-devices/lis3lv02d.rst F: drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/ F: drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c +LIST KUNIT TEST +M: David Gow davidgow@google.com +S: Maintained +F: lib/list-test.c
LIVE PATCHING M: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com M: Jiri Kosina jikos@kernel.org diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index a3017a5dadcd..7991b78eb1f3 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -1961,6 +1961,24 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST If unsure, say N. +config LIST_KUNIT_TEST
- bool "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures"
- depends on KUNIT
- help
This builds the linked list KUnit test suite.It tests that the API and basic functionality of the list_head typeand associated macros.KUnit tests run during boot and output the results to the debug login TAP format (http://testanything.org/). Only useful for kernel devsrunning the KUnit test harness, and not intended for inclusion into aproduction build.For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please referto the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.If unsure, say N.config TEST_UDELAY tristate "udelay test driver" help diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index bba1fd5485f7..890e581d00c4 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -292,3 +292,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_MULDI3) += muldi3.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_CMPDI2) += cmpdi2.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_UCMPDI2) += ucmpdi2.o obj-$(CONFIG_OBJAGG) += objagg.o
+# KUnit tests +obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..75ba3ddac959 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/list-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,740 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/*
- KUnit test for the Kernel Linked-list structures.
- Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC.
- Author: David Gow davidgow@google.com
- */
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+struct list_test_struct {
- int data;
- struct list_head list;
+};
+static void list_test_list_init(struct kunit *test) +{
- /* Test the different ways of initialising a list. */
- struct list_head list1 = LIST_HEAD_INIT(list1);
- struct list_head list2;
- LIST_HEAD(list3);
- struct list_head *list4;
- struct list_head *list5;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list2);
- list4 = kzalloc(sizeof(*list4), GFP_KERNEL);
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, list4);
Why not just use GFP_KERNEL | GFP_NOFAIL and remove the check?
kzalloc() can't return error pointers. If this were an IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check then it would generate a static checker warning, but static checkers don't know about KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() yet so you're safe.
But generally NULL is a special case of success. A common situation is where the user deliberately disables a feature, that means it's not an error but we also don't have a valid pointer to return because it's disabled.
regards, dan carpenter
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 1:27 AM Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:49PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
list4 = kzalloc(sizeof(*list4), GFP_KERNEL);KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, list4);Why not just use GFP_KERNEL | GFP_NOFAIL and remove the check?
I've sent a new version of the patch out (v5) which uses __GFP_NOFAIL instead.
The idea had been to exercise KUnit's assertion functionality, in the hope that it'd allow the test to fail (but potentially allow other tests to still run) in the case of allocation failure. Given that we're only allocating enough to store ~4 pointers in total, though, that's probably of little use.
kzalloc() can't return error pointers. If this were an IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check then it would generate a static checker warning, but static checkers don't know about KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() yet so you're safe.
Alas, KUnit doesn't have a KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() macro, and I'd assumed it was not dangerous (even if not ideal) to check for error pointers, even if kzalloc() can't return them.
Perhaps it'd make sense to add a convenient way of checking the NULL-ness of pointers to KUnit (it's possible with the KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(), but requires a bit of casting to make the type checker happy) in the future. Once KUnit is properly upstream, it may be worth teaching the static analysis tools about these functions to avoid having warnings in these sorts of tests.
For now, though, (and for this test in particular), I agree with the suggestion of just using __GFP_NOFAIL.
Thanks a lot for the comments, -- David
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:13 PM David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 1:27 AM Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:49PM -0700, David Gow wrote:
list4 = kzalloc(sizeof(*list4), GFP_KERNEL);KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, list4);Why not just use GFP_KERNEL | GFP_NOFAIL and remove the check?
I've sent a new version of the patch out (v5) which uses __GFP_NOFAIL instead.
The idea had been to exercise KUnit's assertion functionality, in the hope that it'd allow the test to fail (but potentially allow other tests to still run) in the case of allocation failure. Given that we're only allocating enough to store ~4 pointers in total, though, that's probably of little use.
kzalloc() can't return error pointers. If this were an IS_ERR_OR_NULL() check then it would generate a static checker warning, but static checkers don't know about KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() yet so you're safe.
Alas, KUnit doesn't have a KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() macro, and I'd assumed it was not dangerous (even if not ideal) to check for error pointers, even if kzalloc() can't return them.
Maybe it would be good for us (not in this case, just generally speaking) to add a KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL() and friends?
Perhaps it'd make sense to add a convenient way of checking the NULL-ness of pointers to KUnit (it's possible with the KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ(), but requires a bit of casting to make the type checker happy) in the future. Once KUnit is properly upstream, it may be worth teaching the static analysis tools about these functions to avoid having warnings in these sorts of tests.
For now, though, (and for this test in particular), I agree with the suggestion of just using __GFP_NOFAIL.
Thanks a lot for the comments, -- David
linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org
-
Brendan Higgins -
Dan Carpenter -
David Gow