This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.136-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.10.136-rc1
Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence
Daniel Sneddon daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections
Ning Qiang sohu0106@126.com macintosh/adb: fix oob read in do_adb_query() function
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x13D3:0x3586
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x13D3:0x3587
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x0CB8:0xC558
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x04C5:0x1675
Hilda Wu hildawu@realtek.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek RTL8852C support ID 0x04CA:0x4007
Aaron Ma aaron.ma@canonical.com Bluetooth: btusb: Add support of IMC Networks PID 0x3568
Hakan Jansson hakan.jansson@infineon.com Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add DT compatible for CYW55572
Ahmad Fatoum a.fatoum@pengutronix.de Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add BCM4349B1 variant
Raghavendra Rao Ananta rananta@google.com selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall
Dmitry Klochkov kdmitry556@gmail.com tools/kvm_stat: fix display of error when multiple processes are found
GUO Zihua guozihua@huawei.com crypto: arm64/poly1305 - fix a read out-of-bound
Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com ACPI: APEI: Better fix to avoid spamming the console with old error logs
Werner Sembach wse@tuxedocomputers.com ACPI: video: Shortening quirk list by identifying Clevo by board_name only
Werner Sembach wse@tuxedocomputers.com ACPI: video: Force backlight native for some TongFang devices
George Kennedy george.kennedy@oracle.com tun: avoid double free in tun_free_netdev
Jakub Sitnicki jakub@cloudflare.com selftests/bpf: Check dst_port only on the client socket
Jakub Sitnicki jakub@cloudflare.com selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads
Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at ath9k_htc_tx_get_packet()
Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at ath9k_htc_rxep()
Ben Hutchings ben@decadent.org.uk x86/speculation: Make all RETbleed mitigations 64-bit only
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst | 8 ++ Makefile | 4 +- arch/arm64/crypto/poly1305-glue.c | 2 +- arch/x86/Kconfig | 8 +- arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 + arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 + arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 21 +++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 86 +++++++++++----- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12 ++- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 8 +- drivers/acpi/apei/bert.c | 31 ++++-- drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 55 ++++++---- drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c | 2 + drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 15 +++ drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 2 + drivers/macintosh/adb.c | 2 +- drivers/net/tun.c | 114 +++++++++++---------- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h | 2 + drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_txrx.c | 13 +++ drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c | 4 + tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +- tools/kvm/kvm_stat/kvm_stat | 3 +- .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_fields.c | 60 +++++++---- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sock_fields.c | 45 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c | 81 ++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c | 9 +- 28 files changed, 451 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
On 8/9/22 11:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.136-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels and build tested with BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 23:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.136-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.10.136-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.10.y * git commit: cf6f87a93412e15617900d8213013eb3a6ca08ed * git describe: v5.10.135-24-gcf6f87a93412 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10....
## No test Regressions (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)
## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)
## No test Fixes (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)
## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.10.133-168-g4fd9cb57a3f5)
## Test result summary total: 112413, pass: 99753, fail: 530, skip: 11427, xfail: 703
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 301 total, 301 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 62 total, 60 passed, 2 failed * i386: 52 total, 50 passed, 2 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 51 total, 51 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * s390: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 55 total, 53 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * igt-gpu-tools * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi!
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5...
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) pavel@denx.de
Best regards, Pavel
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Hi Greg,
5.10.136-rc1 tested.
Run tested on: - Intel Skylake x86_64 (nuc6 i5-6260U)
In addition - build tested for: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - Allwinner H6 - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro
Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum rudi@heitbaum.com -- Rudi
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220807): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1618 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1623
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 477 pass: 477 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Tue, 09 Aug 2022 20:00:18 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.136-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail 75 tests: 75 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.136-rc1-gcf6f87a93412 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 8/9/22 12:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.136 release. There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.136-rc... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah