This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.210 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.210-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------- Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Linux 5.4.210-rc1
Pawan Gupta pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence
Daniel Sneddon daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections
Ning Qiang sohu0106@126.com macintosh/adb: fix oob read in do_adb_query() function
Chen-Yu Tsai wenst@chromium.org media: v4l2-mem2mem: Apply DST_QUEUE_OFF_BASE on MMAP buffers across ioctls
Raghavendra Rao Ananta rananta@google.com selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall
Alexey Kardashevskiy aik@ozlabs.ru KVM: Don't null dereference ops->destroy
Jean-Philippe Brucker jean-philippe@linaro.org selftests/bpf: Fix "dubious pointer arithmetic" test
Stanislav Fomichev sdf@google.com selftests/bpf: Fix test_align verifier log patterns
John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com bpf: Test_verifier, #70 error message updates for 32-bit right shift
Jakub Sitnicki jakub@cloudflare.com selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads
John Fastabend john.fastabend@gmail.com bpf: Verifer, adjust_scalar_min_max_vals to always call update_reg_bounds()
Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com ACPI: APEI: Better fix to avoid spamming the console with old error logs
Werner Sembach wse@tuxedocomputers.com ACPI: video: Shortening quirk list by identifying Clevo by board_name only
Werner Sembach wse@tuxedocomputers.com ACPI: video: Force backlight native for some TongFang devices
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy quic_subbaram@quicinc.com thermal: Fix NULL pointer dereferences in of_thermal_ functions
-------------
Diffstat:
Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst | 8 +++ Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 + arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 ++ arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 19 +++++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12 +++- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 1 + drivers/acpi/apei/bert.c | 31 +++++++--- drivers/acpi/video_detect.c | 55 +++++++++++------ drivers/macintosh/adb.c | 2 +- drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-mem2mem.c | 60 +++++++++++++----- drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 9 ++- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 + tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 41 +++++++------ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c | 9 ++- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +- 21 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
On 8/9/22 11:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.210 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.210-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels and build tested with BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 at 23:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.210 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.210-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing lkft@linaro.org
## Build * kernel: 5.4.210-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-5.4.y * git commit: 0bf8828e9254e4c8917e2556001411f431ba0a70 * git describe: v5.4.209-16-g0bf8828e9254 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.20...
## No test Regressions (compared to v5.4.207-123-gb48a8f43dce6)
## No metric Regressions (compared to v5.4.207-123-gb48a8f43dce6)
## No test Fixes (compared to v5.4.207-123-gb48a8f43dce6)
## No metric Fixes (compared to v5.4.207-123-gb48a8f43dce6)
## Test result summary total: 97031, pass: 85084, fail: 452, skip: 10716, xfail: 779
## Build Summary * arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * arm: 302 total, 302 passed, 0 failed * arm64: 61 total, 57 passed, 4 failed * i386: 28 total, 26 passed, 2 failed * mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 54 total, 54 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * sh: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 54 total, 52 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary * fwts * kunit * kvm-unit-tests * libgpiod * libhugetlbfs * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-open-posix-tests * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * packetdrill * rcutorture * ssuite * v4l2-compliance * vdso
-- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.210 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220807): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1622
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk
-- Regards Sudip
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:00:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.210 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results: total: 161 pass: 161 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 449 pass: 449 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
Guenter
On Tue, 09 Aug 2022 20:00:18 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.210 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.210-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.4: 10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail 59 tests: 59 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.4.210-rc1-g0bf8828e9254 Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000, tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com
Jon
On 8/9/22 12:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.210 release. There are 15 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu, 11 Aug 2022 17:55:02 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.210-rc1... or in the git tree and branch at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan skhan@linuxfoundation.org
thanks, -- Shuah