Hi Leo.
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 08:43, Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:07:02AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
Now that the metadata has a length field we can add extra registers without breaking any previous versions of perf.
Save the TRCDEVARCH register so that it can be used to configure the ETE decoder in the next commit. If the sysfs file doesn't exist then 0 will be saved which is an impossible register value and can also be used to signify that the file couldn't be read.
After reviewed the whole patch set, come back to highlight one thing: seems to me ETE is only a feature introduced by new ETMv4 revisions; in other words, if we support ETMv4.5 or any later revisions, it will support ETE feature.
The ETE hardware and trace protocol is introduced to support new architectural features in the PE - principally those associated with v9 architecture and beyond. It has has additional packet types that will never appear in any ETM4.x trace sequence. ETE (and TRBE) are defined as architectural features of the PE - i.e. FEAT_ETE and FEAT_TRBE read from feature registers on the core.
You are correct in saying that some features in ETM v4.x beyond ETM 4.5 will also appear in ETE, but the reverse is not true - ETE is a superset of ETMv4.
Here I think the right thing to do is to support newer revisions for ETMv4, and then based on the revision it creates a decoder with supporting ETE feature. For a more neat solution, if the perf tool passes the "correct" revision number to the OpenCSD decoder, it should can decode trace data with ETE packets. In this way, the ETE decoding can be transparent for perf cs-etm code.
The OpenCSD decoder separates the ETMv4 decoder from the ETE decoder - for the reasons given above.
Additionally the ETE decoder and the ETMv4 decoder required different sets of ID registers to correctly set up the decoder. For example, for ETMv4 the version is extracted form TRCIDR1, for ETE the version in TRCIDR1 is set 0xFF, and thus needs TRCDEVARCH to extract the revision. It is likely that later updates to ETE will require an additional TRCIDR register to be saved.
Choosing the base type of decoder in this way is how the library can support ETMv3, EMTv4, ETE, STM, PTM etc - and while some of those protocols use TRCIDR1 and TRCDEVARCH - not all do.
It would in theory be possible to have the OpenCSD library "autodetect" the type of decoder needed based purely on a set of ID registers. But this set of ID registers would be far larger than the ones currently used, and would require modifcation to a lot of the existing device drivers to ensure they were accessible via sysfs. This register set includes the ID registers that are currently used to identify the component on the AMBA bus and match to the correct driver, plus additional CoreSight management registers. This would also create a dependency between decoder creation and ID numbers - in the same way that each new ETM4.x part number has to be added to the ETM4.x device driver.
Such a system would require a significant update to the OpenCSD infrastructure, and is not planned at this time.
Regards
Mike
How about you think for this? Sorry if I introduce noise due to my lack knowledge (and platform) for ETE.
Thanks, Leo