10 Oct
2017
10 Oct
'17
11:02 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 02:02:30PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote:
I suspect we want to be showing the delta to some fixed baseline (ideally totally clean results!) rather than the previous test run, or including a full list of unexpected failures in the report. Otherwise any issue that doesn't get fixed immediately ends up getting hidden in the reporting which isn't ideal.
There’s a whole thread I started on this last week and why known failures and regressions need to change.
Comments welcome. ;-)
Not sure where you started that thread, I can't seem to see it anywhere but perhaps I'm missing something.