Hi, Arnd:
I've made a mistake that I've tried to build these patches on v4.9-rc1, but I does not set CONFIG_DRM_MEDIATEK=y, therefore I didn't find out these build fails. Now I fix the config problem, and I think I should build these patches on latest kernel version even though patch's owner test on old kernel version. I wish this flow would make things better.
It's ok that you just revert these two patches. I've fixed build fail and will request pull later.
Regards, CK
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday, November 17, 2016 8:50:05 PM CET Dave Airlie wrote:
Arnd could you send a git pull with the two reverts, with my Acked-by on it? I won't be in a place to do it for 8-9hrs.
I don't think it's that urgent, as long as we make sure it's fixed in the next -rc. I've sent out the reverts as patches with a little more information in the changelog: it turns out that they are actually broken on linux-next too, they had just not made it in there, and one of the two actually did build on older kernels.
I think what happened here is that the fixes were tested on a v4.4 kernel and blindly forward-ported. It probably makes sense to look at the entire series again in case another one of them is broken.
Philipp, Hu, Bibby, could one of you have another look?
Arnd