2 Oct
2014
2 Oct
'14
4:17 p.m.
* Paul Walmsley paul@pwsan.com [141002 08:11]:
Maybe you have some ideas for how this can be communicated better in the test results? One thing that would probably help is if the board was renamed to "3730es10beaglexm" or something like that. Also maybe mentioning the fact that the test is only needed due to errata, like:
PM: chip off (except CORE, due to errata) via dynamic idle: Pass ( 1/ 1): 3730es10beaglexm
Oh OK, yeah I did not read the actual test :) The above description makes it clear at least for me.
Regards,
Tony