On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:48:30AM +0000, Linaro QA wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.4.92 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 69f53f5d37d53ba17ca744947226b4cdadb90c13 git describe: v4.4.92 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.92
Regressions (compared to build v4.4.91-48-gc0489dd5896d)
x15 - arm: ltp-syscalls-tests: * fcntl36
* test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.gitHm, what does this mean? Did this regress due to a breakage of your system, as this link: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.92/test... shows all "No log available for this test" :(
No test logs are expected with current status of qa-reports. We have complete log for ltp syscalls runs in a single file and work in progress for split logs for each test case.
Here is the log for the failure test case.
fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD read lock vs OFD write lock fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD write lock vs POSIX write lock fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD read lock vs POSIX write lock fcntl36.c:205: FAIL: Unexpected data offset 12304 value 9 fcntl36.c:205: FAIL: Unexpected data offset 13568 value 47 fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD write lock vs POSIX read lock fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD write lock vs OFD write lock fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD r/w lock vs POSIX write lock fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized fcntl36.c:303: INFO: OFD r/w lock vs POSIX read lock fcntl36.c:381: PASS: Access between threads synchronized Summary: passed 6 failed 2 skipped 0 warnings 0
Linux version 4.4.92 (buildslave@x86-64-08) (gcc version 6.2.1 20161016 (Linaro GCC 6.2-2016.11) ) #1 SMP Thu Oct 12 10:59:44 UTC 2017
LAVA job id: https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/46680#L2847
Bug reported for this failure please refer this link. LKFT: 4.4: X15: LTP syscall test case fcntl36.c:205: FAIL: Unexpected data offset 12304 value 9 https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3339
This bug is not consistence, I have re tested fcntl36. 1. test PASS in independent run "./fcntl36" 2. test FAIL with "strace ./fcntl36"
Re-tested log, https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/47795#L904
Pastebin log for above case if you do not like full boot log. https://pastebin.com/XWuSDaMe
- Naresh
confused.
greg k-h