On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:17:27PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
- Exynos maintainers (for new regresion on exynos5250-snow)
kernelci.org bot bot@kernelci.org writes:
mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec)
Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/ Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/
Tree: mainline Branch: local/master Git Describe: v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec Git Commit: 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git Tested: 57 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 29 builds out of 207
Boot Regressions Detected:
arm:
multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n: exynos5250-snow: lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9-rc8-51-gbc3913a5378c)Boot Failure Detected:
arm:
multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab
Nothing was happening recently around Exynos code (at least mach/dts). Was the 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e pointed out by bisect?
Best regads, Krzysztof