On 01/23/2014 10:14 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Hello,
On 01/23/2014 07:23 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 01/23/2014 03:35 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Kevin's boot bot khilman@linaro.org wrote:
Automated DT boot report for various ARM defconfigs.
Tree/Branch: next Git describe: next-20140122 Failed boot tests (console logs at the end) =========================================== omap3-tobi,3730storm: FAIL: omap2plus_defconfig
[...]
omap3-tobi,3730storm: FAIL: multi_v7_defconfigThese OMAP3 failures are new regressions. Full failure boot log attached. Bisected down to:
cfa9667d4ac9da8b3ba2269f934ecd69ae504d39 is the first bad commit commit cfa9667d4ac9da8b3ba2269f934ecd69ae504d39 Author: Tero Kristo t-kristo@ti.com Date: Tue Oct 22 11:53:02 2013 +0300
ARM: OMAP2+: io: use new clock init API clk_init is now separated to a common function which gets calledfor all SoC:s, which initializes the DT clocks and calls the SoC specific clock init.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>Kevin
Hi,
I think this is because the tobi board is including wrong omap3-soc.dtsi file (omap34xx.dtsi) through omap3-overo.dtsi.
The board should include omap36xx.dtsi at least based on the boot log:
[ 0.000000] OMAP3630 ES1.2 (l2cache iva sgx neon isp 192mhz_clk )
The problem is that the Overo (processor card on the Tobi extension board) can have a variety of processor depending on the exact model:
- OMAP 35xx (1st generation: Air, Earth, Fire, Sand, Tide, Water, FE)
- OMAP 3730
- AM/DM 37xx
omap3-overo.dtsi includes omap34xx.dtsi to be compatible with the first generation.
omap34xx.dtsi | -> omap3-overo.dtsi (processor card) | -> omap3-tobi.dtsi (expansion board)
What is the fundamental incompatibility here? If we have to specifically include omap36xx for newer Overo, it will become hard to maintain as it will double the number of Overo / expansion boards possibilities.
Well, you get different board declaration inside mach-omap2/board-generic.c for omap34xx vs omap36xx.
The clock data issues can be fixed by adding cpu_is_omap34xx() vs. cpu_is_omap3630() checks within the mach-omap2/io.c file, but this is probably for Tony/Kevin to comment whether we can/should do that.
-Tero
Regards,
Florian