On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:30:05AM +0100, Milosz Wasilewski wrote:
On 9 October 2017 at 10:25, Linaro QA qa-reports@linaro.org wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.4.91 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: c030c36a88cdc54a5d657c0a2ee630ba495d5538 git describe: v4.4.91 Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.91
Regressions (compared to build v4.4.90-51-g033261bc6633)
x15 - arm: kselftest: * rtctest
* test src: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/linux-4.13.tar.xzThis looks like test case issue. The log looks as follows:
PIE delta error: 0.036778 should be close to 0.031250 selftests: rtctest [FAIL]
Apart from that there were a few tests that didn't complete due to setup issues:
- LTP syscalls on juno (arm64) - problem with msgctl11 which is
omitted on other boards.
- LTP sched on x86 - running on NFS fails
- LTP timers on x15 (arm) - investigating the problem
When can we start to "trust" these results? Right now they are saying "no regressions" from previous tests, yet there were failures on a previous test from what I remember, so I don't know if this specific run of testing actually is any better or not.
And have you all tried breaking something (a build, a test, etc.) to see if it is caught by the system? Based on the last 4.9-rc1 release, I think something is still wrong in that area...
thanks,
greg k-h