mainline 4.15.0-rc8/8dd903d2cf7b: regressions detected in project lkft/linux-mainline-oe
Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 4.15.0-rc8 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git git branch: master git commit: 8dd903d2cf7b6dfe98be7c19f891882583c7266e git describe: v4.15-rc8-225-g8dd903d2cf7b Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v4.15-rc8-225-g8d...
Regressions (compared to build v4.15-rc8-120-gdda3e15231b3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64: kselftest: * fsgsbase_64
* test src: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
Boards, architectures and test suites: -------------------------------------
juno-r2 - arm64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - skip: 17, pass: 48, * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64, * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 121, pass: 987, * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
x15 - arm * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - skip: 19, pass: 43, fail: 2 * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 87, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 62, fail: 2 * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - skip: 2, pass: 20, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 66, pass: 1037, * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
x86_64 * boot - pass: 20, * kselftest - skip: 18, pass: 61, fail: 1 * libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90, * ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64, * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, pass: 61, * ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19, * ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22, * ltp-io-tests - pass: 3, * ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9, * ltp-math-tests - pass: 11, * ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2, * ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 9, * ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4, * ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 116, pass: 1016, * ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
On 20 January 2018 at 07:52, Linaro QA qa-reports@linaro.org wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.15.0-rc8 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git git branch: master git commit: 8dd903d2cf7b6dfe98be7c19f891882583c7266e git describe: v4.15-rc8-225-g8dd903d2cf7b Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v4.15-rc8-225-g8d...
Regressions (compared to build v4.15-rc8-120-gdda3e15231b3)
x86_64: kselftest: * fsgsbase_64
Re-submitted job
fsgsbase_64 test failed 2 out of 10 times. Need to investigate the real reason for failure.
Fail log: ---------- [RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x0) and clear gs, then schedule to 0x1 Before schedule, set selector to 0x1 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x1) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x0 to 0x0/0x0 <trim> [RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x1), then schedule to 0x200000000 Before schedule, set selector to 0x2 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x200000000) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x0 to 0x0/0x1
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/100583#L2613
- Naresh
* test src: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.gitBoards, architectures and test suites:
juno-r2 - arm64
- boot - pass: 20,
- kselftest - skip: 17, pass: 48,
- libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90,
- ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
- ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
- ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
- ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22,
- ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
- ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
- ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
- ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
- ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14,
- ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
- ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 121, pass: 987,
- ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
x15 - arm
- boot - pass: 20,
- kselftest - skip: 19, pass: 43, fail: 2
- libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 87,
- ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-containers-tests - pass: 62, fail: 2
- ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
- ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
- ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-hugetlb-tests - skip: 2, pass: 20,
- ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
- ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
- ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
- ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
- ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 13,
- ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
- ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 66, pass: 1037,
- ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
x86_64
- boot - pass: 20,
- kselftest - skip: 18, pass: 61, fail: 1
- libhugetlbfs - skip: 1, pass: 90,
- ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
- ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-fs-tests - skip: 1, pass: 61,
- ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
- ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22,
- ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
- ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
- ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
- ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
- ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
- ltp-sched-tests - skip: 1, pass: 9,
- ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
- ltp-syscalls-tests - skip: 116, pass: 1016,
- ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,
Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
-- Linaro QA (beta) https://qa-reports.linaro.org
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:52:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On 20 January 2018 at 07:52, Linaro QA qa-reports@linaro.org wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.15.0-rc8 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git git branch: master git commit: 8dd903d2cf7b6dfe98be7c19f891882583c7266e git describe: v4.15-rc8-225-g8dd903d2cf7b Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v4.15-rc8-225-g8d...
Regressions (compared to build v4.15-rc8-120-gdda3e15231b3)
x86_64: kselftest: * fsgsbase_64
Re-submitted job
fsgsbase_64 test failed 2 out of 10 times. Need to investigate the real reason for failure.
Fail log:
[RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x0) and clear gs, then schedule to 0x1 Before schedule, set selector to 0x1 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x1) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x0 to 0x0/0x0
<trim> [RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x1), then schedule to 0x200000000 Before schedule, set selector to 0x2 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x200000000) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x0 to 0x0/0x1
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/100583#L2613
- Naresh
I looked into this a bit and I think it's a bad test.
We've seen it fail all the way back in 4.14-rc6 (about as far as our data goes): https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/20773#results_3354469
The failure rate is much less than 20%. Sometimes when I run it in a loop I can get several hundreds of runs before it fails, but it will always fail eventually, which explains why we see it so infrequently.
The most recent commit to fsgsbase.c says:
commit 23d98c204386a98d9ef9f9e744f41443ece4929f Author: Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org Date: Tue Aug 1 07:11:36 2017 -0700
selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test selectors 1, 2, and 3
Those are funny cases. Make sure they work.
(Something is screwy with signal handling if a selector is 1, 2, or 3. Anyone who wants to dive into that rabbit hole is welcome to do so.)
I think we may be seeing the "something screwy".
I vote to file the bug (naresh), report the issue upstream (drue), and then add it to the skiplist.
Dan
On 24 January 2018 at 23:02, Dan Rue dan.rue@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:52:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
On 20 January 2018 at 07:52, Linaro QA qa-reports@linaro.org wrote:
Summary
kernel: 4.15.0-rc8 git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git git branch: master git commit: 8dd903d2cf7b6dfe98be7c19f891882583c7266e git describe: v4.15-rc8-225-g8dd903d2cf7b Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v4.15-rc8-225-g8d...
Regressions (compared to build v4.15-rc8-120-gdda3e15231b3)
x86_64: kselftest: * fsgsbase_64
Re-submitted job
fsgsbase_64 test failed 2 out of 10 times. Need to investigate the real reason for failure.
Fail log:
[RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x0) and clear gs, then schedule to 0x1 Before schedule, set selector to 0x1 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x1) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x0 to 0x0/0x0
<trim> [RUN] ARCH_SET_GS(0x1), then schedule to 0x200000000 Before schedule, set selector to 0x2 other thread: ARCH_SET_GS(0x200000000) -- sel is 0x0 [FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x0 to 0x0/0x1
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/100583#L2613
- Naresh
I looked into this a bit and I think it's a bad test.
We've seen it fail all the way back in 4.14-rc6 (about as far as our data goes): https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/20773#results_3354469
The failure rate is much less than 20%. Sometimes when I run it in a loop I can get several hundreds of runs before it fails, but it will always fail eventually, which explains why we see it so infrequently.
The most recent commit to fsgsbase.c says:
commit 23d98c204386a98d9ef9f9e744f41443ece4929f Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Date: Tue Aug 1 07:11:36 2017 -0700 selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test selectors 1, 2, and 3 Those are funny cases. Make sure they work. (Something is screwy with signal handling if a selector is 1, 2, or 3. Anyone who wants to dive into that rabbit hole is welcome to do so.)I think we may be seeing the "something screwy".
I vote to file the bug (naresh), report the issue upstream (drue), and then add it to the skiplist.
LKFT: mainline: x86: kselftests fsgsbase_64 failed - GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x0 to 0x0/0x0 https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3596
- Naresh
Dan
kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org
-
Dan Rue -
Linaro QA -
Naresh Kamboju