Hi,
On 01/23/2014 06:33 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 01/23/2014 10:35 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
[..]
Ok, so with your patch and changing the include from omap34xx to omap36xx, it works. Now I have to come up with a way to manage all the versions without duplicating all the DT files :-(
you'd also want to be careful about the omap3_pmx_core2 Vs omap3_pmx_core2 split for padconf.
Yes, I know that this is another problematic point. I guess that I will end up splitting all 34xx-specific and 36xx-specific parts into dedicated files. Unless I can figure out a way to magically compute the offset inside the pinctrl domain, but I doubt. I will try to contain the omap3_pmx_core2 pins to omap3-overo, away from the expansion boards.
options that come to mind are: a) split omap3-overo.dtsi into omap3-overo-common.dtsi omap3-overo-34xx.dtsi,omap3-overo-36xx.dtsi, corresponding tobi board dts file include as needed b) only have common stuff in omap3-overo.dtsi, include omap34xx.dtsi or omap36xx.dtsi in corresponding tobi board dts.
Yes, both are an option. I don't know if b) can work, as omap3-overo.dtsi maybe depends on features declared in omap3yxx.dtsi (to be verified).
The main problem with both options is that Tobi is not the only expansion board (the only mainlined for now). I sent patches for other expansion boards a couple of days ago [1], so at the end we may have ~10 boards if you count only Gumstix's boards, not to mention the boards from other people (like me). So finally, we will double the number of dts files just to support both variants. I hope that Gumstix will not produce a third version of the Overo.
Maybe I can use dt overlay for the expansion boards, like what is done for capes with beaglebone. The expansion board's overlay could be applied to the correct Overo dtb at runtime, like what is done from the hardware's point of view.
I am not familiar with overlays, but from my rapid analysis, the main difference is: cape's overlay is fused by the userspace when the kernel has booted, whereas Overo's expansion boards must be fused early in the boot process (or by the bootloader), as they provide some essential services, like the primary NIC. I need more time to explore the feasibility of this solution.
Regards,
Florian
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/109589
kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org