linaro-toolchain January 2024

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

16 participants
25 discussions

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #83947: FAIL: 2 regressions on arm

by chenxiaolong

At 08:36 +0000 on Friday, 2024-01-12, wrote ci_notify(a)linaro.org: > Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please > follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's > #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain > developer on the usual project channel. Ok, I will fix this error as soon as possible!

3 months, 4 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-6840-g86f535cb466: FAIL: 2 regressions: 2 progressions on arm

by Christophe Lyon

Hi David, As you have probably guessed, this is a false alarm: the testcases you updated were already failing before your patch, but it changed the line numbers, thus making the scripts think a failure disappeared and a new one appeared. Thanks, Christophe On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 01:15, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1094 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In bootstrap_check master-arm-check_bootstrap_lto after: > > | commit gcc-14-6840-g86f535cb466 > | Author: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Tue Dec 26 16:44:09 2023 +0000 > | > | testsuite: Skip analyzer out-of-bounds-diagram on AIX. > | > | The out-of-bounds diagram tests fail on AIX. > | > | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > | * gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-17.c: Skip on AIX. > | * gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-18.c: Same. > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 2 regressions: 2 progressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-17.c expected multiline pattern lines 15-36 > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-18.c expected multiline pattern lines 15-44 > > === Results Summary === > > progressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-17.c expected multiline pattern lines 14-35 > FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-18.c expected multiline pattern lines 14-43 > > === Results Summary === > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap_… . > The full lists of regressions and progressions are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap_… . > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap_… . > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_bootstrap_check master-arm-check_bootstrap_lto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap_… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap_… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/86f535cb4664fcaf96ff12942887db949b… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_bootstrap_check > ** master-arm-check_bootstrap_lto > *** FAIL: 2 regressions: 2 progressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bootstrap_check--master-arm-check_bootstrap_…

4 months

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 5 Jan

by Peter Maydell

Progress (short week, 2 days): * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - post holiday email/slack/etc catchup - started merging pullrequests (I'm doing release management for the 9.0 cycle) - investigated a reported regression in virtio-pci running Linux on 32-bit arm emulation. This turns out to be that we made a change that *fixed* a bug in QEMU (we were incorrectly laying out the 'virt' board assuming a 32-bit v8 CPU couldn't use LPAE), which reveals a bug in Linux (it mishandles the PCI controller DTB entry saying the ECAM region is above the 4GB boundary)... * QEMU-623 [Nested Virtualization Emulation] - dealt with the minor review followups on this patchset; just waiting for one last reviewed-by tag before we can upstream it -- PMM

4 months

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-6861-g200531d5b9f: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by Andrew Pinski (QUIC)

> -----Original Message----- > From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 7:40 AM > To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > Cc: gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-6861-g200531d5b9f: FAIL: 1 regressions > on arm > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please > follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg > channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project > channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce > the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let > us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1091 , > please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a > fix. First I suspect this was failing before r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8 and I just return it back to that state. The big ask I have is for reports like this, to include the exact gcc configure line that was used. In this case, is GCC configured to include neon by default? If so then the testcase needs to be updated to add an option to disable neon. If not, then someone else will need to look into why the testcase is failing. Basically, the update I did was disable vectorization on a loop which was not being vectorized before r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8. Thanks, Andrew Pinski > > In master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-14-6861-g200531d5b9f > | Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > | Date: Thu Dec 28 20:26:01 2023 -0800 > | > | Fix gen-vect-26.c testcase after loops with multiple exits [PR113167] > | > | This fixes the gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c testcase by adding > | `#pragma GCC novector` in front of the loop that is doing the checking > | of the result. We only want to test the first loop to see if it can be > | vectorize. > | > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tree-ssa.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/gen-vect-26.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of > access forced using peeling" 1 > > === Results Summary === > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm- > build/1147/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ . > The full lists of regressions and progressions are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm- > build/1147/artifact/artifacts/notify/ . > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm- > build/1147/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail . > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<---------------- > ---------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master- > arm-build/1147/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc-- > master-arm-build/1146/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git- > us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/200531d5b9fb99eca2b0d6b8d1e42d17641322 > 5f/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-arm/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc- > mirror/gcc/commit/200531d5b9fb99eca2b0d6b8d1e42d176413225f > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc > ** master-arm > *** FAIL: 1 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/200531d5b9fb99eca2b0d6b8d1e42d17641322 > 5f/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc/master-arm/details.txt > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm- > build/1147/artifact/artifacts

4 months

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.38.9000-382-g446e2c935a: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1093 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In glibc_check master-arm after: | commit glibc-2.38.9000-382-g446e2c935a | Author: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella(a)linaro.org> | Date: Thu Dec 21 15:59:18 2023 -0300 | | debug: Add fortify syslog tests | | It requires to be in a container tests to avoid logging bogus | information on the system. The syslog also requires to be checked in | a different process because the internal printf call will abort with | the internal syslog lock taken (which makes subsequent syslog calls | deadlock). | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:debug ... FAIL: debug/tst-fortify-syslog === Results Summary === You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/788/artifact/a… . The full lists of regressions and progressions are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/788/artifact/a… . The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/788/artifact/a… . The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_glibc_check master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/788/artifact/a… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/787/artifact/a… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=446e2c935a174d33fa99… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_glibc_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 1 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/788/artifact/a…

4 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain January 2024