Hello,
I have a problem building gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf
toolchain for my x86_64 system. I download crosstool-ng (v1.13) and
toolchain source code (4.8-2014.03) from
http://releases.linaro.org/14.03/components/toolchain/binaries. I use
the example configuration linaro-arm-linux-gnueabihf (obtained from
ct-ng list-samples) and modify some entries using menuconfig option,
like the local tarballs directory (pointing to downloaded toolchains
source code directory) and the prefix directory (custom directory output).
This is the problem during the execution of "ct-ng build" command:
=================================================================
[INFO ] Installing final compiler
[EXTRA] Configuring final compiler
[EXTRA] Building final compiler
[EXTRA] AFMOYA: EMPIEZA A EJECUTARSE make jobsflags all
[EXTRA] -j5
[EXTRA] /home/afmoya/Descargas/build/.build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/build/build-cc
[ERROR] configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
[ERROR] make[2]: *** [configure-zlib] Error 1
[ERROR] make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
[ERROR]
[ERROR] >>
[ERROR] >> Error happened in: main[scripts/crosstool-NG.sh]
[ERROR] >>
[ERROR] >> For more info on this error, look at the file: 'build.log'
[ERROR] >> There is a list of known issues, some with workarounds, in:
[ERROR] >> '/opt/cross-linaro/share/doc/ct-ng-linaro-1.13.1-4.8-2014.03/B - Known issues.txt'
[ERROR]
[ERROR] Build failed in step 'Extracting and patching toolchain components'
[ERROR]
[ERROR] (elapsed: 11:18.57)
make: *** [build] Error 2
Highlighted in green some entries added for me in attemp to understand
the execution secuence.
The error is triggered in the "configure-zlib" target of
"${CT_TOP_DIR}/.build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/build/build-cc/Makefile". The
"configure.log" of the
"${CT_TOP_DIR}/.build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/build/build-cc/zlib/"
directory shows some errors (I don't know if the are significants):
LINE 83: Thread model: posix
LINE 84: gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5)
LINE 85: configure:3234: $? = 0
LINE 86: configure:3223: x86_64-build_unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -V >&5
LINE 87: gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-V'
LINE 88: gcc: fatal error: no input files
LINE 89: compilation terminated.
LINE 90: configure:3234: $? = 4
LINE 91: configure:3223: x86_64-build_unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -qversion >&5
LINE 92: gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-qversion'
LINE 93: gcc: fatal error: no input files
LINE 94: compilation terminated.
...
LINE 188: configure:6661: x86_64-build_unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -E conftest.c
LINE 189: conftest.c:11:28: fatal error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
LINE 190: compilation terminated.
...
LINE 207: configure:6720: x86_64-build_unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -E conftest.c
LINE 208: conftest.c:11:28: fatal error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
LINE 209: compilation terminated.
...
LINE 318: configure:10852: x86_64-build_unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -E conftest.c
LINE 319: conftest.c:23:28: fatal error: ac_nonexistent.h: No such file or directory
LINE 320: compilation terminated.
Some idea of what's the problem?
This is my system info:
Linux afmoya-pc 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.57-3 x86_64 GNU/Linux
and some tools version installed in my system:
gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2
GNU Make 3.81
GNU Awk 4.0.1
...
Best regards:
Alexis Fajardo Moya.
== Progress ==
* Prototype scripting for macro-benchmarks for malloc (4/10, TCWG-441)
* glibc single thread optimization work (3/10, TCWG-436)
* Built releases of eglibc, gdb and binutils (2/10)
* glibc patch review and followup (1/10)
* Misc admin (expenses, LCU travel)
== Issues ==
* None
== Plan ==
* Various bits of patch followup
* More malloc macro-benchmark work
* See how single thread optimization discussion goes
* glibc benchmark graphing?
--
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
== Progress ==
* Named Register (CARD-1246 2/10)
- Changing type of intrinsics, rebasing patch
* Build & Benchmark (CARD-716 6/10)
- Adding Clang+LLVM builds to CBuild2
- Re-setting APM's testing environment after replacement
* Background (2/10)
- Code review, etc.
- EuroLLVM 2014 outcome analysis, plans for 2015
== Plan ==
* Get Clang+LLVM in CBuild2
* Get Named registers in, then try Clang's parser
* Try SPEC on APM
hi,
For building arm64 kernel, I tried all toolchain released from
http://releases.linaro.org/latest/components/toolchain/binaries/
But it complained about some instructions bad:
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h: Assembler
messages:
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:49: Error: no
such instruction: `msr daifset,'
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:68: Error: no
such instruction: `mrs %rax,daif//arch_local_save_flags'
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:49: Error: no
such instruction: `msr daifset,'
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:68: Error: no
such instruction: `mrs %rax,daif//arch_local_save_flags'
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:40: Error: no
such instruction: `msr daifclr,'
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:68: Error: no
such instruction: `mrs %rax,daif//arch_local_save_flags'
/home/work/linux/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h:40: Error: no
such instruction: `msr daifclr,'
Could anyone tell how to solve it? thanks!
== Progress==
TCWG-435 needless busy-wait in lowlevellock.c (3/10)
* Patches ready, testing a bit slow & fiddly
TCWG-156 cortex-strings memset (3/10)
* Worried about noisy benchmarks
* Learned to use Lava
* Found some helpful internal docs
* Managed to tweak the code slightly
== Misc ==
Meetings/mail/etc 2/10
(Public) holiday 2/10
== Plan ==
Stop worrying and follow the general curve of the noisy benchmarks
(But also try to convince Maxim's spec scripts + lava to generate some
less noisy results)
Another public holiday next Monday
== Progress ==
* GDB reverse debugging on aarch64
-- Complete decoding of aarch64 data processing immediate instructions.
[TCWG-399] [1/10]
-- Complete decoding of aarch64 data processing register instructions.
[TCWG-402] [1/10]
-- Completed decoding of aarch64 exception and system instructions.
[TCWG-400] [2/10]
-- Further progress on decoding of aarch64 load store instructions.
[TCWG-401] [2/10]
-- Started implementation of aarch64 syscall record/replay. [TCWG-409]
[2/10]
* Sick Day Off on Monday [2/10]
== Plan ==
* GDB reverse debugging on aarch64
-- Further progress on decoding of aarch64 load store instructions.
[TCWG-401]
-- Further progress on aarch64 syscall record/replay. [TCWG-409]
* Public Holiday on 1st May.
Short week, Easter Monday + child care (3/10)
== Issues ==
* Toolchain64 disk still full every 2 days
== Progress ==
* Linaro GCC 4.9 2014.04 release (3/10)
- Branch merge with FSF 4.9.1
- Release tarball available on releases.linaro.org
- Announcement will follow
* Launchpad bugs: (2/10)
o LP #1169164 : including signal.h exposes various PSR_MODE #defines
- Discussed and implemented a fix
- Validation on-going
* Misc:
o Cbuildv1 baby-sitting (1/10)
o Various meetings (1/10).
o Resolved cards :
- TCWG-343. Make LRA the default for the ARM backend
- TCWG-422. LP-bug 1296676 : ICE in assign_by_spills building linux
btrfs module
== Next ==
- One day off (Labor day)
- Submit patch for LP #1169164
- TCWG-345. Analyse performance of LRA for ARM
== Progress ==
PGO - AArch64 (TCWG-179) (4/10)
* Completed SPEC2006 runs ( -O3 + PGO) in chroot + qemu-arm64-saucy
with Linaro branch(4.9).
* Perlbench train run failed, issue with qemu.
* DealII train runs failed due to system libstdc++.so.6 not compatible
with GCC 4.9.
Changing the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the libstdc++.so.6 that
gets built along with GCC 4.9 solves the problem.
* CPU2000 runs are completed my maxim so functional testing of PGO for
spec benchmarks completed.
* Wating on Arm64 hardware to benchmark SPEC2000 and SPEC2006 and
compare against the PGO runs for x86.
Misc (2/10)
* Setup arm64-trusty chroot and built GCC 4.9 compiler
* Maxim 1-1 discussions and set up opennx client
* Checked libssp patch upstream status
* Read about gcc debug counters.
* Upgrade laptop to Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
Short week (22nd and 23rd leave (4/10))
== Plan ==
* Bug fixing.
== Issues==
* Waiting on hardware to Benchmark SPEC2006 PGO runs in hardware.
== Issue ==
* None
== Progress ==
* More tests on shrink-wrap changes (TCWG-133, 6/10).
- Cortex-m3 tests exposes a data flow issue: New BB created after
dfinit does not have correct df_lr info.
- Collect Spec2k benchmarks on X86-64 and ARM.
* Linaro 4.9 binaries release (2/10).
- Update Linaro crosstool-ng config and samples to support 4.9.
- Disable parallel build for gcc manual (pdf & html).
- Prebuild binaries for aarch64:
http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/binaries/4.9-prerelease-2014.04
* Ping aarch64 fcel patch. But still no comments.
* Fix a trunk build fail issue @r209556.
* One day off (2/10).
== Plans ==
* Send the shrink-wrap related patches for review.
* PING the pending patches.
* Investigate move-loop-invariants heuristics.
== Planed leaves ==
* May 1-3: Labour day holiday.
== Progress ==
* Got Jenkins working with matrix builds so we can utilize all LAVA
slaves. (TCWG 1387 - 3/10)
* Write script to take a list of revisions and then build and test
them all and diff the results. (TCWG 448 - 4/10)
* More experimenting with Kugan's benchmarking branch. (1/10)
* Meetings and Misc (2/10)
== Plan ==
* More work on matrix builds. (TCWG 1387)
* More work on regression test analysis and reporting. (TCWG 448)
