No, this isn't plausible. The maintainer_utils changes have no effect at all on the compiler. So there must be some other cause.
R.
On 21/08/2026 15:45, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In aarch64 native, after: | 5 patches in gcc | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/141841 | 237059276db [PATCH v1 5/5] maintainer_utils: more array size verification. | 4891de9f00a [PATCH v1 4/5] maintainer_utils: Ensure the list of user data is sorted. | f18b6593669 [PATCH v1 3/5] maintainer_utils: Move DCO entries outside of roles. | 3126c9b698f [PATCH v1 2/5] maintainer_utils: Fix errors in schema. | 9145fb8e995 [PATCH v1 1/5] maintainer_utils.py: Add a store method | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | de8bbe99481 Add fixme comment to vect_slp_node_weight and containing_loop
Produces 2 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-39.c gcov: 0 failures in line counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 1 in prime-paths, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format, 0 failed in filters | FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-39.c line 175: expected 1/8 covered paths, was 1/7
Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check aarch64-linux-gnu *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu--disable-multilib --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 --with-arch=armv8-a
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
Current build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/buil... Reference build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/builds/1...
Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
Thanks Richard for your feedback.
I am checking why it detected and reported this regression.
I don't have an answer yet. But I'm taking the action to investigate.
Cheers
On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 at 01:16, Richard Earnshaw via linaro-toolchain < linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org> wrote:
No, this isn't plausible. The maintainer_utils changes have no effect at all on the compiler. So there must be some other cause.
R.
On 21/08/2026 15:45, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please
find some details below.
In aarch64 native, after: | 5 patches in gcc | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/141841 | 237059276db [PATCH v1 5/5] maintainer_utils: more array size
verification.
| 4891de9f00a [PATCH v1 4/5] maintainer_utils: Ensure the list of user
data is sorted.
| f18b6593669 [PATCH v1 3/5] maintainer_utils: Move DCO entries
outside of roles.
| 3126c9b698f [PATCH v1 2/5] maintainer_utils: Fix errors in schema. | 9145fb8e995 [PATCH v1 1/5] maintainer_utils.py: Add a store method | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | de8bbe99481 Add fixme comment to vect_slp_node_weight and
containing_loop
Produces 2 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.misc-tests/gcov.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-39.c gcov: 0 failures in line counts, 0 in
branch percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 1 in prime-paths, 0 in return percentages, 0 in intermediate format, 0 failed in filters
| FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-39.c line 175: expected 1/8 covered paths,
was 1/7
Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check aarch64-linux-gnu *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu--disable-multilib --enable-fix-cortex-a53-835769 --enable-fix-cortex-a53-843419 --with-arch=armv8-a
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways
to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/buil...
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and
make commands are in
http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/buil...
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/buil...
Current build :
http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/buil...
Reference build :
http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/builds/1...
Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the master files.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-leave@lists.linaro.org
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
-
Laurent Alfonsi -
Richard Earnshaw