Hi all,
CVE-2024-56741 is supposed to be fixed by commit 7290f5923191 "apparmor:
test: Fix memory leak for aa_unpack_strdup()" but I think this
assignment should be rejected.
While a user-triggered memory leak may be exploitable for denial-of-
service, the code that was fixed here is a part of KUnit tests.
KUnit tests usually run a single time at boot, not under user control,
and can then later be invoked through debugfs by the root user.
Firstly, it is intended that the root user can deny service through the
reboot system call, so I don't think additional ways to do this are
security flaws.
Secondly, the KUnit documentation at <https://docs.kernel.org/dev-
tools/kunit/run_manual.html> says:
Note:
KUnit is not designed for use in a production system. It is possible
that tests may reduce the stability or security of the system.
so I don't think security issues in KUnit tests generally deserve CVE
IDs. (That said, the help text for CONFIG_KUNIT does not have such a
warning.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable
from a rigged demo.
The following series fixes some bugs and adding some error messages
which are not handled.
This also add some selftests which tests the new error messages.
Thank you,
---
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) (8):
tracing: tprobe-events: Fix a memory leak when tprobe with $retval
tracing: tprobe-events: Reject invalid tracepoint name
tracing: fprobe-events: Log error for exceeding the number of entry args
tracing: probe-events: Log errro for exceeding the number of arguments
tracing: probe-events: Remove unused MAX_ARG_BUF_LEN macro
selftests/ftrace: Expand the tprobe event test to check wrong format
selftests/ftrace: Add new syntax error test
selftests/ftrace: Add dynamic events argument limitation test case
kernel/trace/trace_eprobe.c | 2 +
kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c | 25 +++++++++++-
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 5 ++
kernel/trace/trace_probe.h | 6 ++-
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 9 +++-
.../ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_tprobe.tc | 14 +++++++
.../ftrace/test.d/dynevent/dynevent_limitations.tc | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++
.../ftrace/test.d/dynevent/fprobe_syntax_errors.tc | 1
8 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/dynevent_limitations.tc
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat(a)kernel.org>
The nolibc testsuite can be run against other libcs to test for
interoperability. Some aspects of the constructor execution are not
standardized and musl does not provide all tested feature, for one it
does not provide arguments to the constructors, anymore?
Skip the constructor tests on non-nolibc configurations.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
index 798fbdcd3ff8c36b514feb3fa1c7b8d7701cccd7..94db506eca906ff0ce8f518298dee34abf386484 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
@@ -738,9 +738,9 @@ int run_startup(int min, int max)
CASE_TEST(environ_HOME); EXPECT_PTRNZ(1, getenv("HOME")); break;
CASE_TEST(auxv_addr); EXPECT_PTRGT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, test_auxv, brk); break;
CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_UID); EXPECT_EQ(1, getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); break;
- CASE_TEST(constructor); EXPECT_EQ(1, constructor_test_value, 2); break;
+ CASE_TEST(constructor); EXPECT_EQ(is_nolibc, constructor_test_value, 2); break;
CASE_TEST(linkage_errno); EXPECT_PTREQ(1, linkage_test_errno_addr(), &errno); break;
- CASE_TEST(linkage_constr); EXPECT_EQ(1, linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); break;
+ CASE_TEST(linkage_constr); EXPECT_EQ(is_nolibc, linkage_test_constructor_test_value, 6); break;
case __LINE__:
return ret; /* must be last */
/* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */
---
base-commit: 16681bea9a80080765c98b545ad74c17de2d513c
change-id: 20250212-nolibc-test-constructor-42491ba71a19
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>
The guard regions feature was initially implemented to support anonymous
mappings only, excluding shmem.
This was done such as to introduce the feature carefully and incrementally
and to be conservative when considering the various caveats and corner
cases that are applicable to file-backed mappings but not to anonymous
ones.
Now this feature has landed in 6.13, it is time to revisit this and to
extend this functionality to file-backed and shmem mappings.
In order to make this maximally useful, and since one may map file-backed
mappings read-only (for instance ELF images), we also remove the
restriction on read-only mappings and permit the establishment of guard
regions in any non-hugetlb, non-mlock()'d mapping.
It is permissible to permit the establishment of guard regions in read-only
mappings because the guard regions only reduce access to the mapping, and
when removed simply reinstate the existing attributes of the underlying
VMA, meaning no access violations can occur.
While the change in kernel code introduced in this series is small, the
majority of the effort here is spent in extending the testing to assert
that the feature works correctly across numerous file-backed mapping
scenarios.
Every single guard region self-test performed against anonymous memory
(which is relevant and not anon-only) has now been updated to also be
performed against shmem and a mapping of a file in the working directory.
This confirms that all cases also function correctly for file-backed guard
regions.
In addition a number of other tests are added for specific file-backed
mapping scenarios.
There are a number of other concerns that one might have with regard to
guard regions, addressed below:
Readahead
~~~~~~~~~
Readahead is a process through which the page cache is populated on the
assumption that sequential reads will occur, thus amortising I/O and,
through a clever use of the PG_readahead folio flag establishing during
major fault and checked upon minor fault, provides for asynchronous I/O to
occur as dat is processed, reducing I/O stalls as data is faulted in.
Guard regions do not alter this mechanism which operations at the folio and
fault level, but do of course prevent the faulting of folios that would
otherwise be mapped.
In the instance of a major fault prior to a guard region, synchronous
readahead will occur including populating folios in the page cache which
the guard regions will, in the case of the mapping in question, prevent
access to.
In addition, if PG_readahead is placed in a folio that is now inaccessible,
this will prevent asynchronous readahead from occurring as it would
otherwise do.
However, there are mechanisms for heuristically resetting this within
readahead regardless, which will 'recover' correct readahead behaviour.
Readahead presumes sequential data access, the presence of a guard region
clearly indicates that, at least in the guard region, no such sequential
access will occur, as it cannot occur there.
So this should have very little impact on any real workload. The far more
important point is as to whether readahead causes incorrect or
inappropriate mapping of ranges disallowed by the presence of guard
regions - this is not the case, as readahead does not 'pre-fault' memory in
this fashion.
At any rate, any mechanism which would attempt to do so would hit the usual
page fault paths, which correctly handle PTE markers as with anonymous
mappings.
Fault-Around
~~~~~~~~~~~~
The fault-around logic, in a similar vein to readahead, attempts to improve
efficiency with regard to file-backed memory mappings, however it differs
in that it does not try to fetch folios into the page cache that are about
to be accessed, but rather pre-maps a range of folios around the faulting
address.
Guard regions making use of PTE markers makes this relatively trivial, as
this case is already handled - see filemap_map_folio_range() and
filemap_map_order0_folio() - in both instances, the solution is to simply
keep the established page table mappings and let the fault handler take
care of PTE markers, as per the comment:
/*
* NOTE: If there're PTE markers, we'll leave them to be
* handled in the specific fault path, and it'll prohibit
* the fault-around logic.
*/
This works, as establishing guard regions results in page table mappings
with PTE markers, and clearing them removes them.
Truncation
~~~~~~~~~~
File truncation will not eliminate existing guard regions, as the
truncation operation will ultimately zap the range via
unmap_mapping_range(), which specifically excludes PTE markers.
Zapping
~~~~~~~
Zapping is, as with anonymous mappings, handled by zap_nonpresent_ptes(),
which specifically deals with guard entries, leaving them intact except in
instances such as process teardown or munmap() where they need to be
removed.
Reclaim
~~~~~~~
When reclaim is performed on file-backed folios, it ultimately invokes
try_to_unmap_one() via the rmap. If the folio is non-large, then map_pte()
will ultimately abort the operation for the guard region mapping. If large,
then check_pte() will determine that this is a non-device private
entry/device-exclusive entry 'swap' PTE and thus abort the operation in
that instance.
Therefore, no odd things happen in the instance of reclaim being attempted
upon a file-backed guard region.
Hole Punching
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This updates the page cache and ultimately invokes unmap_mapping_range(),
which explicitly leaves PTE markers in place.
Because the establishment of guard regions zapped any existing mappings to
file-backed folios, once the guard regions are removed then the
hole-punched region will be faulted in as usual and everything will behave
as expected.
Lorenzo Stoakes (4):
mm: allow guard regions in file-backed and read-only mappings
selftests/mm: rename guard-pages to guard-regions
tools/selftests: expand all guard region tests to file-backed
tools/selftests: add file/shmem-backed mapping guard region tests
mm/madvise.c | 8 +-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/.gitignore | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 2 +-
.../mm/{guard-pages.c => guard-regions.c} | 921 ++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 821 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)
rename tools/testing/selftests/mm/{guard-pages.c => guard-regions.c} (58%)
--
2.48.1
While nolibc does support ARM Thumb instructions,
that support was not tested specifically.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>
---
Thomas Weißschuh (2):
selftests/nolibc: explicitly enable ARM mode
selftests/nolibc: add armthumb configuration
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 7 +++++++
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 3bd53b2fa57d9472d3af63b3f4d26023ba07b579
change-id: 20250228-nolibc-armthumb-372963140267
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>
Introduce support for the N32 and N64 ABIs. As preparation, the
entrypoint is first simplified significantly. Thanks to Maciej for all
the valuable information.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>
---
Changes in v2:
- Clean up entrypoint first
- Annotate #endifs
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250212-nolibc-mips-n32-v1-1-6892e58d1321@weisss…
---
Thomas Weißschuh (4):
tools/nolibc: MIPS: drop $gp setup
tools/nolibc: MIPS: drop manual stack pointer alignment
tools/nolibc: MIPS: drop noreorder option
tools/nolibc: MIPS: add support for N64 and N32 ABIs
tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 28 ++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh | 2 +-
3 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 9c812b01f13d37410ea103e00bc47e5e0f6d2bad
change-id: 20231105-nolibc-mips-n32-234901bd910d
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>