On systems where the shmget() syscall is not supported, tests like
anon_page and shared_waitv will fail. Skip these tests in such cases to
allow the rest of the test suite to run.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas(a)google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait.c
index 152ca4612886..1269642bb662 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_wait.c
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ TEST(anon_page)
/* Testing an anon page shared memory */
shm_id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 4096, IPC_CREAT | 0666);
if (shm_id < 0) {
+ if (errno == ENOSYS)
+ ksft_exit_skip("shmget syscall not supported\n");
perror("shmget");
exit(1);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c
index c684b10eb76e..3bc4e5dc70e7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c
@@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ TEST(shared_waitv)
int shm_id = shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 4096, IPC_CREAT | 0666);
if (shm_id < 0) {
+ if (errno == ENOSYS)
+ ksft_exit_skip("shmget syscall not supported\n");
perror("shmget");
exit(1);
}
--
2.51.0.869.ge66316f041-goog
Basics and overview
===================
Software with larger attack surfaces (e.g. network facing apps like databases,
browsers or apps relying on browser runtimes) suffer from memory corruption
issues which can be utilized by attackers to bend control flow of the program
to eventually gain control (by making their payload executable). Attackers are
able to perform such attacks by leveraging call-sites which rely on indirect
calls or return sites which rely on obtaining return address from stack memory.
To mitigate such attacks, risc-v extension zicfilp enforces that all indirect
calls must land on a landing pad instruction `lpad` else cpu will raise software
check exception (a new cpu exception cause code on riscv).
Similarly for return flow, risc-v extension zicfiss extends architecture with
- `sspush` instruction to push return address on a shadow stack
- `sspopchk` instruction to pop return address from shadow stack
and compare with input operand (i.e. return address on stack)
- `sspopchk` to raise software check exception if comparision above
was a mismatch
- Protection mechanism using which shadow stack is not writeable via
regular store instructions
More information an details can be found at extensions github repo [1].
Equivalent to landing pad (zicfilp) on x86 is `ENDBRANCH` instruction in Intel
CET [3] and branch target identification (BTI) [4] on arm.
Similarly x86's Intel CET has shadow stack [5] and arm64 has guarded control
stack (GCS) [6] which are very similar to risc-v's zicfiss shadow stack.
x86 and arm64 support for user mode shadow stack is already in mainline.
Kernel awareness for user control flow integrity
================================================
This series picks up Samuel Holland's envcfg changes [2] as well. So if those are
being applied independently, they should be removed from this series.
Enabling:
In order to maintain compatibility and not break anything in user mode, kernel
doesn't enable control flow integrity cpu extensions on binary by default.
Instead exposes a prctl interface to enable, disable and lock the shadow stack
or landing pad feature for a task. This allows userspace (loader) to enumerate
if all objects in its address space are compiled with shadow stack and landing
pad support and accordingly enable the feature. Additionally if a subsequent
`dlopen` happens on a library, user mode can take a decision again to disable
the feature (if incoming library is not compiled with support) OR terminate the
task (if user mode policy is strict to have all objects in address space to be
compiled with control flow integirty cpu feature). prctl to enable shadow stack
results in allocating shadow stack from virtual memory and activating for user
address space. x86 and arm64 are also following same direction due to similar
reason(s).
clone/fork:
On clone and fork, cfi state for task is inherited by child. Shadow stack is
part of virtual memory and is a writeable memory from kernel perspective
(writeable via a restricted set of instructions aka shadow stack instructions)
Thus kernel changes ensure that this memory is converted into read-only when
fork/clone happens and COWed when fault is taken due to sspush, sspopchk or
ssamoswap. In case `CLONE_VM` is specified and shadow stack is to be enabled,
kernel will automatically allocate a shadow stack for that clone call.
map_shadow_stack:
x86 introduced `map_shadow_stack` system call to allow user space to explicitly
map shadow stack memory in its address space. It is useful to allocate shadow
for different contexts managed by a single thread (green threads or contexts)
risc-v implements this system call as well.
signal management:
If shadow stack is enabled for a task, kernel performs an asynchronous control
flow diversion to deliver the signal and eventually expects userspace to issue
sigreturn so that original execution can be resumed. Even though resume context
is prepared by kernel, it is in user space memory and is subject to memory
corruption and corruption bugs can be utilized by attacker in this race window
to perform arbitrary sigreturn and eventually bypass cfi mechanism.
Another issue is how to ensure that cfi related state on sigcontext area is not
trampled by legacy apps or apps compiled with old kernel headers.
In order to mitigate control-flow hijacting, kernel prepares a token and place
it on shadow stack before signal delivery and places address of token in
sigcontext structure. During sigreturn, kernel obtains address of token from
sigcontext struture, reads token from shadow stack and validates it and only
then allow sigreturn to succeed. Compatiblity issue is solved by adopting
dynamic sigcontext management introduced for vector extension. This series
re-factor the code little bit to allow future sigcontext management easy (as
proposed by Andy Chiu from SiFive)
config and compilation:
Introduce a new risc-v config option `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI`. Selecting this
config option picks the kernel support for user control flow integrity. This
optin is presented only if toolchain has shadow stack and landing pad support.
And is on purpose guarded by toolchain support. Reason being that eventually
vDSO also needs to be compiled in with shadow stack and landing pad support.
vDSO compile patches are not included as of now because landing pad labeling
scheme is yet to settle for usermode runtime.
To get more information on kernel interactions with respect to
zicfilp and zicfiss, patch series adds documentation for
`zicfilp` and `zicfiss` in following:
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfiss.rst
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst
How to test this series
=======================
Toolchain
---------
$ git clone git@github.com:sifive/riscv-gnu-toolchain.git -b cfi-dev
$ riscv-gnu-toolchain/configure --prefix=<path-to-where-to-build> --with-arch=rv64gc_zicfilp_zicfiss --enable-linux --disable-gdb --with-extra-multilib-test="rv64gc_zicfilp_zicfiss-lp64d:-static"
$ make -j$(nproc)
Qemu
----
Get the lastest qemu
$ cd qemu
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ ../configure --target-list=riscv64-softmmu
$ make -j$(nproc)
Opensbi
-------
$ git clone git@github.com:deepak0414/opensbi.git -b v6_cfi_spec_split_opensbi
$ make CROSS_COMPILE=<your riscv toolchain> -j$(nproc) PLATFORM=generic
Linux
-----
Running defconfig is fine. CFI is enabled by default if the toolchain
supports it.
$ make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=<path-to-cfi-riscv-gnu-toolchain>/build/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -j$(nproc) defconfig
$ make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=<path-to-cfi-riscv-gnu-toolchain>/build/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -j$(nproc)
Running
-------
Modify your qemu command to have:
-bios <path-to-cfi-opensbi>/build/platform/generic/firmware/fw_dynamic.bin
-cpu rv64,zicfilp=true,zicfiss=true,zimop=true,zcmop=true
References
==========
[1] - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-cfi
[2] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240814081126.956287-1-samuel.holland@sifive.c…
[3] - https://lwn.net/Articles/889475/
[4] - https://developer.arm.com/documentation/109576/0100/Branch-Target-Identific…
[5] - https://www.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/catc17-i…
[6] - https://lwn.net/Articles/940403/
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com>
To: x86(a)kernel.org
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa(a)zytor.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
To: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett(a)oracle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley(a)sifive.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer(a)dabbelt.com>
To: Albert Ou <aou(a)eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: Conor Dooley <conor(a)kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh(a)kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt(a)kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg(a)redhat.com>
To: Eric Biederman <ebiederm(a)xmission.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees(a)kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet(a)lwn.net>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt(a)kernel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda(a)kernel.org>
To: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor(a)gmail.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng(a)gmail.com>
To: Gary Guo <gary(a)garyguo.net>
To: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh(a)protonmail.com>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin(a)proton.me>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg(a)kernel.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl(a)google.com>
To: Trevor Gross <tmgross(a)umich.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm(a)kvack.org
Cc: linux-riscv(a)lists.infradead.org
Cc: devicetree(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: alistair.francis(a)wdc.com
Cc: richard.henderson(a)linaro.org
Cc: jim.shu(a)sifive.com
Cc: andybnac(a)gmail.com
Cc: kito.cheng(a)sifive.com
Cc: charlie(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: atishp(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: evan(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: cleger(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: alexghiti(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: samitolvanen(a)google.com
Cc: broonie(a)kernel.org
Cc: rick.p.edgecombe(a)intel.com
Cc: rust-for-linux(a)vger.kernel.org
changelog
---------
v20:
- rebased on v6.18-rc1.
- Added two vDSO support. If `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI` is selected
two vDSOs are compiled (one for hardware prior to RVA23 and one
for RVA23 onwards). Kernel exposes RVA23 vDSO if hardware/cpu
implements zimop else exposes existing vDSO to userspace.
- default selection for `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI` is "Yes".
- replaced "__ASSEMBLY__" with "__ASSEMBLER__"
v19:
- riscv_nousercfi was `int`. changed it to unsigned long.
Thanks to Alex Ghiti for reporting it. It was a bug.
- ELP is cleared on trap entry only when CONFIG_64BIT.
- restore ssp back on return to usermode was being done
before `riscv_v_context_nesting_end` on trap exit path.
If kernel shadow stack were enabled this would result in
kernel operating on user shadow stack and panic (as I found
in my testing of kcfi patch series). So fixed that.
v18:
- rebased on 6.16-rc1
- uprobe handling clears ELP in sstatus image in pt_regs
- vdso was missing shadow stack elf note for object files.
added that. Additional asm file for vdso needed the elf marker
flag. toolchain should complain if `-fcf-protection=full` and
marker is missing for object generated from asm file. Asked
toolchain folks to fix this. Although no reason to gate the merge
on that.
- Split up compile options for march and fcf-protection in vdso
Makefile
- CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI option is moved under "Kernel features" menu
Added `arch/riscv/configs/hardening.config` fragment which selects
CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
v17:
- fixed warnings due to empty macros in usercfi.h (reported by alexg)
- fixed prefixes in commit titles reported by alexg
- took below uprobe with fcfi v2 patch from Zong Li and squashed it with
"riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception and uprobe handling"
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250604093403.10916-1-zong.li@sifive.com/
v16:
- If FWFT is not implemented or returns error for shadow stack activation, then
no_usercfi is set to disable shadow stack. Although this should be picked up
by extension validation and activation. Fixed this bug for zicfilp and zicfiss
both. Thanks to Charlie Jenkins for reporting this.
- If toolchain doesn't support cfi, cfi kselftest shouldn't build. Suggested by
Charlie Jenkins.
- Default for CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is set to no. Charlie/Atish suggested to
keep it off till we have more hardware availibility with RVA23 profile and
zimop/zcmop implemented. Else this will start breaking people's workflow
- Includes the fix if "!RV64 and !SBI" then definitions for FWFT in
asm-offsets.c error.
v15:
- Toolchain has been updated to include `-fcf-protection` flag. This
exists for x86 as well. Updated kernel patches to compile vDSO and
selftest to compile with `fcf-protection=full` flag.
- selecting CONFIG_RISCV_USERCFI selects CONFIG_RISCV_SBI.
- Patch to enable shadow stack for kernel wasn't hidden behind
CONFIG_RISCV_USERCFI and CONFIG_RISCV_SBI. fixed that.
v14:
- rebased on top of palmer/sbi-v3. Thus dropped clement's FWFT patches
Updated RISCV_ISA_EXT_XXXX in hwcap and hwprobe constants.
- Took Radim's suggestions on bitfields.
- Placed cfi_state at the end of thread_info block so that current situation
is not disturbed with respect to member fields of thread_info in single
cacheline.
v13:
- cpu_supports_shadow_stack/cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr uses
riscv_has_extension_unlikely()
- uses nops(count) to create nop slide
- RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER is not needed in `amo_user_shstk`. Removed it
- changed ternaries to simply use implicit casting to convert to bool.
- kernel command line allows to disable zicfilp and zicfiss independently.
updated kernel-parameters.txt.
- ptrace user abi for cfi uses bitmasks instead of bitfields. Added ptrace
kselftest.
- cosmetic and grammatical changes to documentation.
v12:
- It seems like I had accidently squashed arch agnostic indirect branch
tracking prctl and riscv implementation of those prctls. Split them again.
- set_shstk_status/set_indir_lp_status perform CSR writes only when CPU
support is available. As suggested by Zong Li.
- Some minor clean up in kselftests as suggested by Zong Li.
v11:
- patch "arch/riscv: compile vdso with landing pad" was unconditionally
selecting `_zicfilp` for vDSO compile. fixed that. Changed `lpad 1` to
to `lpad 0`.
v10:
- dropped "mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check shadow stack vma". This patch
is not that interesting to this patch series for risc-v. There are instances in
arch directories where VM_SHADOW_STACK flag is anyways used. Dropping this patch
to expedite merging in riscv tree.
- Took suggestions from `Clement` on "riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration" to
validate presence of cfi based on config.
- Added a patch for vDSO to have `lpad 0`. I had omitted this earlier to make sure
we add single vdso object with cfi enabled. But a vdso object with scheme of
zero labeled landing pad is least common denominator and should work with all
objects of zero labeled as well as function-signature labeled objects.
v9:
- rebased on master (39a803b754d5 fix braino in "9p: fix ->rename_sem exclusion")
- dropped "mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK" (master has it from arm64/gcs)
- dropped "prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack" (master has it from arm64/gcs)
v8:
- rebased on palmer/for-next
- dropped samuel holland's `envcfg` context switch patches.
they are in parlmer/for-next
v7:
- Removed "riscv/Kconfig: enable HAVE_EXIT_THREAD for riscv"
Instead using `deactivate_mm` flow to clean up.
see here for more context
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908203655.543765-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.…
- Changed the header include in `kselftest`. Hopefully this fixes compile
issue faced by Zong Li at SiFive.
- Cleaned up an orphaned change to `mm/mmap.c` in below patch
"riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE"
- Lock interfaces for shadow stack and indirect branch tracking expect arg == 0
Any future evolution of this interface should accordingly define how arg should
be setup.
- `mm/map.c` has an instance of using `VM_SHADOW_STACK`. Fixed it to use helper
`is_shadow_stack_vma`.
- Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008-v5_user_cfi_series-v6-0-60d9fe073f37@riv…
v6:
- Picked up Samuel Holland's changes as is with `envcfg` placed in
`thread` instead of `thread_info`
- fixed unaligned newline escapes in kselftest
- cleaned up messages in kselftest and included test output in commit message
- fixed a bug in clone path reported by Zong Li
- fixed a build issue if CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V is not selected
(this was introduced due to re-factoring signal context
management code)
v5:
- rebased on v6.12-rc1
- Fixed schema related issues in device tree file
- Fixed some of the documentation related issues in zicfilp/ss.rst
(style issues and added index)
- added `SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER` so that implementation can define base
of shadow stack.
- Fixed warnings on definitions added in usercfi.h when
CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is not selected.
- Adopted context header based signal handling as proposed by Andy Chiu
- Added support for enabling kernel mode access to shadow stack using
FWFT
(https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/src/ext-firmware…)
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001-v5_user_cfi_series-v1-0-3ba65b6e550f@riv…
(Note: I had an issue in my workflow due to which version number wasn't
picked up correctly while sending out patches)
v4:
- rebased on 6.11-rc6
- envcfg: Converged with Samuel Holland's patches for envcfg management on per-
thread basis.
- vma_is_shadow_stack is renamed to is_vma_shadow_stack
- picked up Mark Brown's `ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK` patch
- signal context: using extended context management to maintain compatibility.
- fixed `-Wmissing-prototypes` compiler warnings for prctl functions
- Documentation fixes and amending typos.
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912231650.3740732-1-debug@rivosinc.com/
v3:
- envcfg
logic to pick up base envcfg had a bug where `ENVCFG_CBZE` could have been
picked on per task basis, even though CPU didn't implement it. Fixed in
this series.
- dt-bindings
As suggested, split into separate commit. fixed the messaging that spec is
in public review
- arch_is_shadow_stack change
arch_is_shadow_stack changed to vma_is_shadow_stack
- hwprobe
zicfiss / zicfilp if present will get enumerated in hwprobe
- selftests
As suggested, added object and binary filenames to .gitignore
Selftest binary anyways need to be compiled with cfi enabled compiler which
will make sure that landing pad and shadow stack are enabled. Thus removed
separate enable/disable tests. Cleaned up tests a bit.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240403234054.2020347-1-debug@rivosinc.com/
v2:
- Using config `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI`, kernel support for riscv control flow
integrity for user mode programs can be compiled in the kernel.
- Enabling of control flow integrity for user programs is left to user runtime
- This patch series introduces arch agnostic `prctls` to enable shadow stack
and indirect branch tracking. And implements them on riscv.
---
Changes in v20:
- Link to v19: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250731-v5_user_cfi_series-v19-0-09b468d7beab@ri…
Changes in v19:
- Link to v18: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250711-v5_user_cfi_series-v18-0-a8ee62f9f38e@ri…
Changes in v18:
- Link to v17: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250604-v5_user_cfi_series-v17-0-4565c2cf869f@ri…
Changes in v17:
- Link to v16: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250522-v5_user_cfi_series-v16-0-64f61a35eee7@ri…
Changes in v16:
- Link to v15: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502-v5_user_cfi_series-v15-0-914966471885@ri…
Changes in v15:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v14: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250429-v5_user_cfi_series-v14-0-5239410d012a@ri…
Changes in v14:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v13: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250424-v5_user_cfi_series-v13-0-971437de586a@ri…
Changes in v13:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v12: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250314-v5_user_cfi_series-v12-0-e51202b53138@ri…
Changes in v12:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v11: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250310-v5_user_cfi_series-v11-0-86b36cbfb910@ri…
Changes in v11:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v10: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-v5_user_cfi_series-v10-0-163dcfa31c60@ri…
---
Andy Chiu (1):
riscv: signal: abstract header saving for setup_sigcontext
Deepak Gupta (26):
mm: VM_SHADOW_STACK definition for riscv
dt-bindings: riscv: zicfilp and zicfiss in dt-bindings (extensions.yaml)
riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration
riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp extension csr and bit definitions
riscv: usercfi state for task and save/restore of CSR_SSP on trap entry/exit
riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE
riscv/mm: manufacture shadow stack pte
riscv/mm: teach pte_mkwrite to manufacture shadow stack PTEs
riscv/mm: write protect and shadow stack
riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall
riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone
riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls
prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking
riscv: Implements arch agnostic indirect branch tracking prctls
riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception and uprobe handling
riscv/signal: save and restore of shadow stack for signal
riscv/kernel: update __show_regs to print shadow stack register
riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files
riscv/hwprobe: zicfilp / zicfiss enumeration in hwprobe
riscv: kernel command line option to opt out of user cfi
riscv: enable kernel access to shadow stack memory via FWFT sbi call
arch/riscv: dual vdso creation logic and select vdso based on hw
riscv: create a config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support
riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking
riscv: Documentation for shadow stack on riscv
kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi
Jim Shu (1):
arch/riscv: compile vdso with landing pad and shadow stack note
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 +
Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst | 2 +
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst | 115 +++++
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfiss.rst | 179 +++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 14 +
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 21 +
arch/riscv/Makefile | 8 +-
arch/riscv/configs/hardening.config | 4 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/assembler.h | 44 ++
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 12 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h | 16 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h | 2 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 2 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h | 26 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 7 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 30 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 95 ++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso.h | 7 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 3 +
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 34 ++
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 10 +
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 27 +
arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 38 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 27 +
arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 27 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c | 95 ++++
arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c | 148 +++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 2 +
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 10 +
arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 54 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 545 +++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 7 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 40 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/flush_icache.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/gen_vdso_offsets.sh | 4 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/getcpu.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/note.S | 3 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/rt_sigreturn.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/sys_hwprobe.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha.S | 5 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso_cfi/Makefile | 25 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso_cfi/vdso-cfi.S | 11 +
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/mm/pgtable.c | 16 +
include/linux/cpu.h | 4 +
include/linux/mm.h | 7 +
include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 2 +
include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 27 +
kernel/sys.c | 30 ++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/.gitignore | 3 +
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/Makefile | 16 +
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfi_rv_test.h | 82 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/riscv_cfi_test.c | 173 +++++++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.c | 385 +++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.h | 27 +
62 files changed, 2468 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 3a8660878839faadb4f1a6dd72c3179c1df56787
change-id: 20240930-v5_user_cfi_series-3dc332f8f5b2
--
- debug
v21: fixed build errors.
Basics and overview
===================
Software with larger attack surfaces (e.g. network facing apps like databases,
browsers or apps relying on browser runtimes) suffer from memory corruption
issues which can be utilized by attackers to bend control flow of the program
to eventually gain control (by making their payload executable). Attackers are
able to perform such attacks by leveraging call-sites which rely on indirect
calls or return sites which rely on obtaining return address from stack memory.
To mitigate such attacks, risc-v extension zicfilp enforces that all indirect
calls must land on a landing pad instruction `lpad` else cpu will raise software
check exception (a new cpu exception cause code on riscv).
Similarly for return flow, risc-v extension zicfiss extends architecture with
- `sspush` instruction to push return address on a shadow stack
- `sspopchk` instruction to pop return address from shadow stack
and compare with input operand (i.e. return address on stack)
- `sspopchk` to raise software check exception if comparision above
was a mismatch
- Protection mechanism using which shadow stack is not writeable via
regular store instructions
More information an details can be found at extensions github repo [1].
Equivalent to landing pad (zicfilp) on x86 is `ENDBRANCH` instruction in Intel
CET [3] and branch target identification (BTI) [4] on arm.
Similarly x86's Intel CET has shadow stack [5] and arm64 has guarded control
stack (GCS) [6] which are very similar to risc-v's zicfiss shadow stack.
x86 and arm64 support for user mode shadow stack is already in mainline.
Kernel awareness for user control flow integrity
================================================
This series picks up Samuel Holland's envcfg changes [2] as well. So if those are
being applied independently, they should be removed from this series.
Enabling:
In order to maintain compatibility and not break anything in user mode, kernel
doesn't enable control flow integrity cpu extensions on binary by default.
Instead exposes a prctl interface to enable, disable and lock the shadow stack
or landing pad feature for a task. This allows userspace (loader) to enumerate
if all objects in its address space are compiled with shadow stack and landing
pad support and accordingly enable the feature. Additionally if a subsequent
`dlopen` happens on a library, user mode can take a decision again to disable
the feature (if incoming library is not compiled with support) OR terminate the
task (if user mode policy is strict to have all objects in address space to be
compiled with control flow integirty cpu feature). prctl to enable shadow stack
results in allocating shadow stack from virtual memory and activating for user
address space. x86 and arm64 are also following same direction due to similar
reason(s).
clone/fork:
On clone and fork, cfi state for task is inherited by child. Shadow stack is
part of virtual memory and is a writeable memory from kernel perspective
(writeable via a restricted set of instructions aka shadow stack instructions)
Thus kernel changes ensure that this memory is converted into read-only when
fork/clone happens and COWed when fault is taken due to sspush, sspopchk or
ssamoswap. In case `CLONE_VM` is specified and shadow stack is to be enabled,
kernel will automatically allocate a shadow stack for that clone call.
map_shadow_stack:
x86 introduced `map_shadow_stack` system call to allow user space to explicitly
map shadow stack memory in its address space. It is useful to allocate shadow
for different contexts managed by a single thread (green threads or contexts)
risc-v implements this system call as well.
signal management:
If shadow stack is enabled for a task, kernel performs an asynchronous control
flow diversion to deliver the signal and eventually expects userspace to issue
sigreturn so that original execution can be resumed. Even though resume context
is prepared by kernel, it is in user space memory and is subject to memory
corruption and corruption bugs can be utilized by attacker in this race window
to perform arbitrary sigreturn and eventually bypass cfi mechanism.
Another issue is how to ensure that cfi related state on sigcontext area is not
trampled by legacy apps or apps compiled with old kernel headers.
In order to mitigate control-flow hijacting, kernel prepares a token and place
it on shadow stack before signal delivery and places address of token in
sigcontext structure. During sigreturn, kernel obtains address of token from
sigcontext struture, reads token from shadow stack and validates it and only
then allow sigreturn to succeed. Compatiblity issue is solved by adopting
dynamic sigcontext management introduced for vector extension. This series
re-factor the code little bit to allow future sigcontext management easy (as
proposed by Andy Chiu from SiFive)
config and compilation:
Introduce a new risc-v config option `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI`. Selecting this
config option picks the kernel support for user control flow integrity. This
optin is presented only if toolchain has shadow stack and landing pad support.
And is on purpose guarded by toolchain support. Reason being that eventually
vDSO also needs to be compiled in with shadow stack and landing pad support.
vDSO compile patches are not included as of now because landing pad labeling
scheme is yet to settle for usermode runtime.
To get more information on kernel interactions with respect to
zicfilp and zicfiss, patch series adds documentation for
`zicfilp` and `zicfiss` in following:
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfiss.rst
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst
How to test this series
=======================
Toolchain
---------
$ git clone git@github.com:sifive/riscv-gnu-toolchain.git -b cfi-dev
$ riscv-gnu-toolchain/configure --prefix=<path-to-where-to-build> --with-arch=rv64gc_zicfilp_zicfiss --enable-linux --disable-gdb --with-extra-multilib-test="rv64gc_zicfilp_zicfiss-lp64d:-static"
$ make -j$(nproc)
Qemu
----
Get the lastest qemu
$ cd qemu
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ ../configure --target-list=riscv64-softmmu
$ make -j$(nproc)
Opensbi
-------
$ git clone git@github.com:deepak0414/opensbi.git -b v6_cfi_spec_split_opensbi
$ make CROSS_COMPILE=<your riscv toolchain> -j$(nproc) PLATFORM=generic
Linux
-----
Running defconfig is fine. CFI is enabled by default if the toolchain
supports it.
$ make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=<path-to-cfi-riscv-gnu-toolchain>/build/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -j$(nproc) defconfig
$ make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=<path-to-cfi-riscv-gnu-toolchain>/build/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -j$(nproc)
Running
-------
Modify your qemu command to have:
-bios <path-to-cfi-opensbi>/build/platform/generic/firmware/fw_dynamic.bin
-cpu rv64,zicfilp=true,zicfiss=true,zimop=true,zcmop=true
References
==========
[1] - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-cfi
[2] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240814081126.956287-1-samuel.holland@sifive.c…
[3] - https://lwn.net/Articles/889475/
[4] - https://developer.arm.com/documentation/109576/0100/Branch-Target-Identific…
[5] - https://www.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/catc17-i…
[6] - https://lwn.net/Articles/940403/
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com>
To: x86(a)kernel.org
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa(a)zytor.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org>
To: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett(a)oracle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley(a)sifive.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer(a)dabbelt.com>
To: Albert Ou <aou(a)eecs.berkeley.edu>
To: Conor Dooley <conor(a)kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh(a)kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt(a)kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg(a)redhat.com>
To: Eric Biederman <ebiederm(a)xmission.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees(a)kernel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet(a)lwn.net>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org>
To: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt(a)kernel.org>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda(a)kernel.org>
To: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor(a)gmail.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng(a)gmail.com>
To: Gary Guo <gary(a)garyguo.net>
To: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh(a)protonmail.com>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin(a)proton.me>
To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg(a)kernel.org>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl(a)google.com>
To: Trevor Gross <tmgross(a)umich.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm(a)kvack.org
Cc: linux-riscv(a)lists.infradead.org
Cc: devicetree(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org
Cc: alistair.francis(a)wdc.com
Cc: richard.henderson(a)linaro.org
Cc: jim.shu(a)sifive.com
Cc: andybnac(a)gmail.com
Cc: kito.cheng(a)sifive.com
Cc: charlie(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: atishp(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: evan(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: cleger(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: alexghiti(a)rivosinc.com
Cc: samitolvanen(a)google.com
Cc: broonie(a)kernel.org
Cc: rick.p.edgecombe(a)intel.com
Cc: rust-for-linux(a)vger.kernel.org
changelog
---------
v21:
- Fixing build errors due to changes in arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso.h
Using #ifdef instead of IS_ENABLED in arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso.h
vdso-cfi-offsets.h should be included only when CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
is selected.
v20:
- rebased on v6.18-rc1.
- Added two vDSO support. If `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI` is selected
two vDSOs are compiled (one for hardware prior to RVA23 and one
for RVA23 onwards). Kernel exposes RVA23 vDSO if hardware/cpu
implements zimop else exposes existing vDSO to userspace.
- default selection for `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI` is "Yes".
- replaced "__ASSEMBLY__" with "__ASSEMBLER__"
v19:
- riscv_nousercfi was `int`. changed it to unsigned long.
Thanks to Alex Ghiti for reporting it. It was a bug.
- ELP is cleared on trap entry only when CONFIG_64BIT.
- restore ssp back on return to usermode was being done
before `riscv_v_context_nesting_end` on trap exit path.
If kernel shadow stack were enabled this would result in
kernel operating on user shadow stack and panic (as I found
in my testing of kcfi patch series). So fixed that.
v18:
- rebased on 6.16-rc1
- uprobe handling clears ELP in sstatus image in pt_regs
- vdso was missing shadow stack elf note for object files.
added that. Additional asm file for vdso needed the elf marker
flag. toolchain should complain if `-fcf-protection=full` and
marker is missing for object generated from asm file. Asked
toolchain folks to fix this. Although no reason to gate the merge
on that.
- Split up compile options for march and fcf-protection in vdso
Makefile
- CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI option is moved under "Kernel features" menu
Added `arch/riscv/configs/hardening.config` fragment which selects
CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI
v17:
- fixed warnings due to empty macros in usercfi.h (reported by alexg)
- fixed prefixes in commit titles reported by alexg
- took below uprobe with fcfi v2 patch from Zong Li and squashed it with
"riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception and uprobe handling"
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250604093403.10916-1-zong.li@sifive.com/
v16:
- If FWFT is not implemented or returns error for shadow stack activation, then
no_usercfi is set to disable shadow stack. Although this should be picked up
by extension validation and activation. Fixed this bug for zicfilp and zicfiss
both. Thanks to Charlie Jenkins for reporting this.
- If toolchain doesn't support cfi, cfi kselftest shouldn't build. Suggested by
Charlie Jenkins.
- Default for CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is set to no. Charlie/Atish suggested to
keep it off till we have more hardware availibility with RVA23 profile and
zimop/zcmop implemented. Else this will start breaking people's workflow
- Includes the fix if "!RV64 and !SBI" then definitions for FWFT in
asm-offsets.c error.
v15:
- Toolchain has been updated to include `-fcf-protection` flag. This
exists for x86 as well. Updated kernel patches to compile vDSO and
selftest to compile with `fcf-protection=full` flag.
- selecting CONFIG_RISCV_USERCFI selects CONFIG_RISCV_SBI.
- Patch to enable shadow stack for kernel wasn't hidden behind
CONFIG_RISCV_USERCFI and CONFIG_RISCV_SBI. fixed that.
v14:
- rebased on top of palmer/sbi-v3. Thus dropped clement's FWFT patches
Updated RISCV_ISA_EXT_XXXX in hwcap and hwprobe constants.
- Took Radim's suggestions on bitfields.
- Placed cfi_state at the end of thread_info block so that current situation
is not disturbed with respect to member fields of thread_info in single
cacheline.
v13:
- cpu_supports_shadow_stack/cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr uses
riscv_has_extension_unlikely()
- uses nops(count) to create nop slide
- RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER is not needed in `amo_user_shstk`. Removed it
- changed ternaries to simply use implicit casting to convert to bool.
- kernel command line allows to disable zicfilp and zicfiss independently.
updated kernel-parameters.txt.
- ptrace user abi for cfi uses bitmasks instead of bitfields. Added ptrace
kselftest.
- cosmetic and grammatical changes to documentation.
v12:
- It seems like I had accidently squashed arch agnostic indirect branch
tracking prctl and riscv implementation of those prctls. Split them again.
- set_shstk_status/set_indir_lp_status perform CSR writes only when CPU
support is available. As suggested by Zong Li.
- Some minor clean up in kselftests as suggested by Zong Li.
v11:
- patch "arch/riscv: compile vdso with landing pad" was unconditionally
selecting `_zicfilp` for vDSO compile. fixed that. Changed `lpad 1` to
to `lpad 0`.
v10:
- dropped "mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check shadow stack vma". This patch
is not that interesting to this patch series for risc-v. There are instances in
arch directories where VM_SHADOW_STACK flag is anyways used. Dropping this patch
to expedite merging in riscv tree.
- Took suggestions from `Clement` on "riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration" to
validate presence of cfi based on config.
- Added a patch for vDSO to have `lpad 0`. I had omitted this earlier to make sure
we add single vdso object with cfi enabled. But a vdso object with scheme of
zero labeled landing pad is least common denominator and should work with all
objects of zero labeled as well as function-signature labeled objects.
v9:
- rebased on master (39a803b754d5 fix braino in "9p: fix ->rename_sem exclusion")
- dropped "mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK" (master has it from arm64/gcs)
- dropped "prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack" (master has it from arm64/gcs)
v8:
- rebased on palmer/for-next
- dropped samuel holland's `envcfg` context switch patches.
they are in parlmer/for-next
v7:
- Removed "riscv/Kconfig: enable HAVE_EXIT_THREAD for riscv"
Instead using `deactivate_mm` flow to clean up.
see here for more context
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908203655.543765-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.…
- Changed the header include in `kselftest`. Hopefully this fixes compile
issue faced by Zong Li at SiFive.
- Cleaned up an orphaned change to `mm/mmap.c` in below patch
"riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE"
- Lock interfaces for shadow stack and indirect branch tracking expect arg == 0
Any future evolution of this interface should accordingly define how arg should
be setup.
- `mm/map.c` has an instance of using `VM_SHADOW_STACK`. Fixed it to use helper
`is_shadow_stack_vma`.
- Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008-v5_user_cfi_series-v6-0-60d9fe073f37@riv…
v6:
- Picked up Samuel Holland's changes as is with `envcfg` placed in
`thread` instead of `thread_info`
- fixed unaligned newline escapes in kselftest
- cleaned up messages in kselftest and included test output in commit message
- fixed a bug in clone path reported by Zong Li
- fixed a build issue if CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V is not selected
(this was introduced due to re-factoring signal context
management code)
v5:
- rebased on v6.12-rc1
- Fixed schema related issues in device tree file
- Fixed some of the documentation related issues in zicfilp/ss.rst
(style issues and added index)
- added `SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER` so that implementation can define base
of shadow stack.
- Fixed warnings on definitions added in usercfi.h when
CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is not selected.
- Adopted context header based signal handling as proposed by Andy Chiu
- Added support for enabling kernel mode access to shadow stack using
FWFT
(https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/src/ext-firmware…)
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001-v5_user_cfi_series-v1-0-3ba65b6e550f@riv…
(Note: I had an issue in my workflow due to which version number wasn't
picked up correctly while sending out patches)
v4:
- rebased on 6.11-rc6
- envcfg: Converged with Samuel Holland's patches for envcfg management on per-
thread basis.
- vma_is_shadow_stack is renamed to is_vma_shadow_stack
- picked up Mark Brown's `ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK` patch
- signal context: using extended context management to maintain compatibility.
- fixed `-Wmissing-prototypes` compiler warnings for prctl functions
- Documentation fixes and amending typos.
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912231650.3740732-1-debug@rivosinc.com/
v3:
- envcfg
logic to pick up base envcfg had a bug where `ENVCFG_CBZE` could have been
picked on per task basis, even though CPU didn't implement it. Fixed in
this series.
- dt-bindings
As suggested, split into separate commit. fixed the messaging that spec is
in public review
- arch_is_shadow_stack change
arch_is_shadow_stack changed to vma_is_shadow_stack
- hwprobe
zicfiss / zicfilp if present will get enumerated in hwprobe
- selftests
As suggested, added object and binary filenames to .gitignore
Selftest binary anyways need to be compiled with cfi enabled compiler which
will make sure that landing pad and shadow stack are enabled. Thus removed
separate enable/disable tests. Cleaned up tests a bit.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240403234054.2020347-1-debug@rivosinc.com/
v2:
- Using config `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI`, kernel support for riscv control flow
integrity for user mode programs can be compiled in the kernel.
- Enabling of control flow integrity for user programs is left to user runtime
- This patch series introduces arch agnostic `prctls` to enable shadow stack
and indirect branch tracking. And implements them on riscv.
---
Changes in v21:
- Link to v20: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251013-v5_user_cfi_series-v20-0-b9de4be9912e@ri…
Changes in v20:
- Link to v19: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250731-v5_user_cfi_series-v19-0-09b468d7beab@ri…
Changes in v19:
- Link to v18: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250711-v5_user_cfi_series-v18-0-a8ee62f9f38e@ri…
Changes in v18:
- Link to v17: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250604-v5_user_cfi_series-v17-0-4565c2cf869f@ri…
Changes in v17:
- Link to v16: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250522-v5_user_cfi_series-v16-0-64f61a35eee7@ri…
Changes in v16:
- Link to v15: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502-v5_user_cfi_series-v15-0-914966471885@ri…
Changes in v15:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v14: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250429-v5_user_cfi_series-v14-0-5239410d012a@ri…
Changes in v14:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v13: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250424-v5_user_cfi_series-v13-0-971437de586a@ri…
Changes in v13:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v12: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250314-v5_user_cfi_series-v12-0-e51202b53138@ri…
Changes in v12:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v11: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250310-v5_user_cfi_series-v11-0-86b36cbfb910@ri…
Changes in v11:
- changelog posted just below cover letter
- Link to v10: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-v5_user_cfi_series-v10-0-163dcfa31c60@ri…
---
Andy Chiu (1):
riscv: signal: abstract header saving for setup_sigcontext
Deepak Gupta (26):
mm: VM_SHADOW_STACK definition for riscv
dt-bindings: riscv: zicfilp and zicfiss in dt-bindings (extensions.yaml)
riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration
riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp extension csr and bit definitions
riscv: usercfi state for task and save/restore of CSR_SSP on trap entry/exit
riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE
riscv/mm: manufacture shadow stack pte
riscv/mm: teach pte_mkwrite to manufacture shadow stack PTEs
riscv/mm: write protect and shadow stack
riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall
riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone
riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls
prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking
riscv: Implements arch agnostic indirect branch tracking prctls
riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception and uprobe handling
riscv/signal: save and restore of shadow stack for signal
riscv/kernel: update __show_regs to print shadow stack register
riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files
riscv/hwprobe: zicfilp / zicfiss enumeration in hwprobe
riscv: kernel command line option to opt out of user cfi
riscv: enable kernel access to shadow stack memory via FWFT sbi call
arch/riscv: dual vdso creation logic and select vdso based on hw
riscv: create a config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support
riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking
riscv: Documentation for shadow stack on riscv
kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi
Jim Shu (1):
arch/riscv: compile vdso with landing pad and shadow stack note
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 +
Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst | 2 +
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst | 115 +++++
Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfiss.rst | 179 +++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 14 +
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 21 +
arch/riscv/Makefile | 8 +-
arch/riscv/configs/hardening.config | 4 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/assembler.h | 44 ++
arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 12 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h | 16 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h | 2 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 2 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h | 26 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 7 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 30 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 95 ++++
arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso.h | 13 +-
arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 3 +
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 +
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 34 ++
arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 1 +
arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 2 +
arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 10 +
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 27 +
arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 38 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 27 +
arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 27 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c | 95 ++++
arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c | 148 +++++-
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 2 +
arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 10 +
arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 54 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 545 +++++++++++++++++++++
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 7 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 40 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/flush_icache.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/gen_vdso_offsets.sh | 4 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/getcpu.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/note.S | 3 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/rt_sigreturn.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/sys_hwprobe.S | 4 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha.S | 5 +-
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso_cfi/Makefile | 25 +
arch/riscv/kernel/vdso_cfi/vdso-cfi.S | 11 +
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/mm/pgtable.c | 16 +
include/linux/cpu.h | 4 +
include/linux/mm.h | 7 +
include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 2 +
include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 27 +
kernel/sys.c | 30 ++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/.gitignore | 3 +
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/Makefile | 16 +
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfi_rv_test.h | 82 ++++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/riscv_cfi_test.c | 173 +++++++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.c | 385 +++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.h | 27 +
62 files changed, 2474 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 3a8660878839faadb4f1a6dd72c3179c1df56787
change-id: 20240930-v5_user_cfi_series-3dc332f8f5b2
--
- debug
Currently it is not possible to disable streaming mode via ptrace on SME
only systems, the interface for doing this is to write via NT_ARM_SVE but
such writes will be rejected on a system without SVE support. Enable this
functionality by allowing userspace to write SVE_PT_REGS_FPSIMD format data
via NT_ARM_SVE with the vector length set to 0 on SME only systems. Such
writes currently error since we require that a vector length is specified
which should minimise the risk that existing software is relying on current
behaviour.
Reads are not supported since I am not aware of any use case for this and
there is some risk that an existing userspace application may be confused if
it reads NT_ARM_SVE on a system without SVE. Existing kernels will return
FPSIMD formatted register state from NT_ARM_SVE if full SVE state is not
stored, for example if the task has not used SVE. Returning a vector length
of 0 would create a risk that software could try to do things like allocate
space for register state with zero sizes, while returning a vector length of
128 bits would look like SVE is supported. It seems safer to just not make
the changes to add read support.
It remains possible for userspace to detect a SME only system via the ptrace
interface only since reads of NT_ARM_SSVE and NT_ARM_ZA will suceed while
reads of NT_ARM_SVE will fail. Read/write access to the FPSIMD registers in
non-streaming mode is available via REGSET_FPR.
The aim is is to make a minimally invasive change, no operation that would
previously have succeeded will be affected, and we use a previously defined
interface in new circumstances rather than define completely new ABI.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
- Rebase onto v6.18-rc1
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250820-arm64-sme-ptrace-sme-only-v1-0-f7c22b287…
---
Mark Brown (3):
arm64/sme: Support disabling streaming mode via ptrace on SME only systems
kselftst/arm64: Test NT_ARM_SVE FPSIMD format writes on non-SVE systems
kselftest/arm64: Cover disabling streaming mode without SVE in fp-ptrace
Documentation/arch/arm64/sve.rst | 5 +++
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 40 +++++++++++++++---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fp-ptrace.c | 5 +--
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: cb6649f6217c0331b885cf787f1d175963e2a1d2
change-id: 20250717-arm64-sme-ptrace-sme-only-1fb850600ea0
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org>
[ Background ]
On ARM GIC systems and others, the target address of the MSI is translated
by the IOMMU. For GIC, the MSI address page is called "ITS" page. When the
IOMMU is disabled, the MSI address is programmed to the physical location
of the GIC ITS page (e.g. 0x20200000). When the IOMMU is enabled, the ITS
page is behind the IOMMU, so the MSI address is programmed to an allocated
IO virtual address (a.k.a IOVA), e.g. 0xFFFF0000, which must be mapped to
the physical ITS page: IOVA (0xFFFF0000) ===> PA (0x20200000).
When a 2-stage translation is enabled, IOVA will be still used to program
the MSI address, though the mappings will be in two stages:
IOVA (0xFFFF0000) ===> IPA (e.g. 0x80900000) ===> PA (0x20200000)
(IPA stands for Intermediate Physical Address).
If the device that generates MSI is attached to an IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA, the
IOVA is dynamically allocated from the top of the IOVA space. If attached
to an IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED (e.g. a VFIO passthrough device), the IOVA is
fixed to an MSI window reported by the IOMMU driver via IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI,
which is hardwired to MSI_IOVA_BASE (IOVA==0x8000000) for ARM IOMMUs.
So far, this IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI works well as kernel is entirely in charge
of the IOMMU translation (1-stage translation), since the IOVA for the ITS
page is fixed and known by kernel. However, with virtual machine enabling
a nested IOMMU translation (2-stage), a guest kernel directly controls the
stage-1 translation with an IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA, mapping a vITS page (at an
IPA 0x80900000) onto its own IOVA space (e.g. 0xEEEE0000). Then, the host
kernel can't know that guest-level IOVA to program the MSI address.
There have been two approaches to solve this problem:
1. Create an identity mapping in the stage-1. VMM could insert a few RMRs
(Reserved Memory Regions) in guest's IORT. Then the guest kernel would
fetch these RMR entries from the IORT and create an IOMMU_RESV_DIRECT
region per iommu group for a direct mapping. Eventually, the mappings
would look like: IOVA (0x8000000) === IPA (0x8000000) ===> 0x20200000
This requires an IOMMUFD ioctl for kernel and VMM to agree on the IPA.
2. Forward the guest-level MSI IOVA captured by VMM to the host-level GIC
driver, to program the correct MSI IOVA. Forward the VMM-defined vITS
page location (IPA) to the kernel for the stage-2 mapping. Eventually:
IOVA (0xFFFF0000) ===> IPA (0x80900000) ===> PA (0x20200000)
This requires a VFIO ioctl (for IOVA) and an IOMMUFD ioctl (for IPA).
Worth mentioning that when Eric Auger was working on the same topic with
the VFIO iommu uAPI, he had the approach (2) first, and then switched to
the approach (1), suggested by Jean-Philippe for reduction of complexity.
The approach (1) basically feels like the existing VFIO passthrough that
has a 1-stage mapping for the unmanaged domain, yet only by shifting the
MSI mapping from stage 1 (guest-has-no-iommu case) to stage 2 (guest-has-
iommu case). So, it could reuse the existing IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI piece, by
sharing the same idea of "VMM leaving everything to the kernel".
The approach (2) is an ideal solution, yet it requires additional effort
for kernel to be aware of the 1-stage gIOVA(s) and 2-stage IPAs for vITS
page(s), which demands VMM to closely cooperate.
* It also brings some complicated use cases to the table where the host
or/and guest system(s) has/have multiple ITS pages.
[ Execution ]
The iommu core rework (part-1) for iommufd_sw_msi is merged. So, now the
IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI can be used as an ABI. VMM can take this hard coded MSI
window and create a direct stage-1 mapping using RMR in the guest's IORT.
However, a proper uAPI must be defined for kernel and VMM to agree on wrt
this virtual MSI window.
Moreover, some use cases might want to map the IOVAs in IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI
for something else. This requires kernel to provide an interface to shift
the software MSI window to a different region:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250909154600.910110-1-shyamsaini@linux.micros…
This series, as a follow-up series, introduces a pair of iommufd options
for user space to configure the software MSI window.
[ Future Plan ]
Part-3 and beyond will continue the effort of supporting the approach (2)
for a complete vITS-to-pITS mapping:
1) Map the phsical ITS page (potentially via IOMMUFD_CMD_IOAS_MAP_MSI)
2) Convey the IOVAs per-irq (potentially via VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_PREPARE)
Note that the set_option uAPI in this series might not fit since this
requires it is an array of MSI IOVAs.)
This series is on github:
https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/iommufd_msi_p2-v2
Pairing QEMU branch for testing (approach 1):
https://github.com/nicolinc/qemu/commits/wip/for_iommufd_msi_p2-v2-rmr
Changelog
v2
* Rebase on v6.18-rc1
* Update commit logs and kdocs
* Add a patch fixing iommufd_device_is_attached()
* Add sanity check for overflow and cover it in the selftest
v1 (containing part-1 that is now merged)
https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1739005085.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com/
Thanks!
Nicolin
Nicolin Chen (7):
iommufd/device: Move sw_msi_start from igroup to idev
iommufd: Pass in idev to iopt_table_enforce_dev_resv_regions
iommufd/device: Make iommufd_device_is_attached non-static
iommufd: Add IOMMU_OPTION_SW_MSI_START/SIZE ioctls
iommufd/selftest: Add MOCK_FLAGS_DEVICE_NO_ATTACH
iommufd/selftest: Add a testing reserved region
iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for IOMMU_OPTION_SW_MSI_START/SIZE
drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 7 +-
drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_test.h | 4 +
include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h | 21 +++-
drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 43 +++----
drivers/iommu/iommufd/driver.c | 4 +-
drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.c | 18 ++-
drivers/iommu/iommufd/ioas.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c | 4 +
drivers/iommu/iommufd/selftest.c | 35 +++++-
tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/iommu/iommufd_fail_nth.c | 21 ++++
11 files changed, 339 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
According to Peter, we've had for a very long time an issue on some
mutltiouch touchpads where the fingers were stuck in a scrolling mode,
or 3 fingers gesture mode. I was unable to debug it because it was
rather hard to reproduce.
Recently, some people raised the issue again on libinput, and this time
added a recording of the actual bug.
It turns out that the sticky finger quirk that was introduced back in
2017 was only checking the last report, and that those missing releases
also happen when moving from 3 to 1 finger (only 1 is released instead
of 2).
This solution seems to me to be the most sensible, because we could also
add the NSMU quirk to win8 multitouch touchpads, but this would involve
a lot more computations at each report for rather annoying corner cases.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libinput/libinput/-/issues/1194
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss(a)kernel.org>
---
Benjamin Tissoires (2):
HID: multitouch: fix sticky fingers
selftests/hid: add tests for missing release on the Dell Synaptics
drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c | 27 ++++++-----
.../testing/selftests/hid/tests/test_multitouch.py | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 54ba6d9b1393a0061600c0e49c8ebef65d60a8b2
change-id: 20250926-fix-sticky-fingers-8ae88436ae82
Best regards,
--
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss(a)kernel.org>
This series adds comprehensive testing infrastructure for Netlink
and Generic Netlink
The implementation includes both kernel module and userspace tests to
verify correct Generic Netlink and Netlink behaviors under
various conditions.
Yana Bashlykova (15):
genetlink: add sysfs test module for Generic Netlink
genetlink: add TEST_GENL family for netlink testing
genetlink: add PARALLEL_GENL test family
genetlink: add test case for duplicate genl family registration
genetlink: add test case for family with invalid ops
genetlink: add netlink notifier support
genetlink: add THIRD_GENL family
genetlink: verify unregister fails for non-registered family
genetlink: add LARGE_GENL stress test family
selftests: net: genetlink: add packet capture test infrastructure
selftests: net: genetlink: add /proc/net/netlink test
selftests: net: genetlink: add Generic Netlink controller tests
selftests: net: genetlink: add large family ID resolution test
selftests: net: genetlink: add Netlink and Generic Netlink test suite
selftests: net: genetlink: fix expectation for large family resolution
drivers/net/Kconfig | 2 +
drivers/net/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/net/genetlink/Kconfig | 8 +
drivers/net/genetlink/Makefile | 3 +
.../net-pf-16-proto-16-family-PARALLEL_GENL.c | 1921 ++++++
tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile | 6 +
tools/testing/selftests/net/genetlink.c | 5152 +++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 7094 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/net/genetlink/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/net/genetlink/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/net/genetlink/net-pf-16-proto-16-family-PARALLEL_GENL.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/genetlink.c
--
2.34.1
I looked at the fchmodat2() tests since I've been experiencing some
random intermittent segfaults with them in my test systems, while doing
so I noticed these two issues. Unfortunately I didn't figure out the
original yet, unless I managed to fix it unwittingly.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- Rebase onto v6.18-rc1.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250812-selftests-fchmodat2-v2-0-f2d5380e94c3@ke…
Changes in v2:
- Rebase onto v6.17-rc1.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250714-selftests-fchmodat2-v1-0-b74f3ee0d09c@ke…
---
Mark Brown (2):
selftests/fchmodat2: Clean up temporary files and directories
selftests/fchmodat2: Use ksft_finished()
tools/testing/selftests/fchmodat2/fchmodat2_test.c | 166 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 3a8660878839faadb4f1a6dd72c3179c1df56787
change-id: 20250711-selftests-fchmodat2-c30374c376f8
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org>