Linux-kselftest-mirror

linux-kselftest-mirror@lists.linaro.org

119 participants
14261 discussions

[PATCH v3 0/4] selftests/resctrl: Add Hygon CPUs support and bug fixes

by Xiaochen Shen

The resctrl selftest currently exhibits several failures on Hygon CPUs due to missing vendor detection and edge-case handling specific to Hygon's architecture. This patch series addresses three distinct issues: 1. Missing CPU vendor detection, causing the test to fail with "# Can not get vendor info..." on Hygon CPUs. 2. A division-by-zero crash in SNC detection on Hygon CPUs. 3. Incorrect handling of non-contiguous CBM support on Hygon CPUs. These changes enable resctrl selftest to run successfully on Hygon CPUs that support Platform QoS features. Changelog: v3: - Patch 1: 1. Update the return types of detect_vendor() and get_vendor() from 'int' to 'unsigned int' to align with their usage as bitmask values and to prevent potentially risky type conversions (Fenghua). 2. Split the code changes of "define CPU vendor IDs as bits to match usage" from original patch 1 into a separate patch (this patch, suggested by Fenghua and Reinette). 3. Introduce the flag 'initialized' to simplify the get_vendor() -> detect_vendor() logic (Reinette). - Patch 2 (original patch 1): 1. Move the code changes of "define CPU vendor IDs as bits to match usage" into patch 1. - Patch 3 (original patch 2): 1. Fix a nit of code comment for affected platforms (Fenghua). 2. Add Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay(a)nvidia.com>. - Patch 4 (original patch 3): 1. Fix a nit to avoid calling get_vendor() twice (Fenghua). 2. Add Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay(a)nvidia.com>. v2: - Patch 1: switch all of the vendor id bitmasks to use BIT() (Reinette) - Patch 2: add Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre(a)intel.com> - Patch 3: add Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre(a)intel.com> add a maintainer note to highlight it is not a candidate for backport (Reinette) Xiaochen Shen (4): selftests/resctrl: Define CPU vendor IDs as bits to match usage selftests/resctrl: Add CPU vendor detection for Hygon selftests/resctrl: Fix a division by zero error on Hygon selftests/resctrl: Fix non-contiguous CBM check for Hygon tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 6 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl.h | 8 ++++-- .../testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_tests.c | 28 +++++++++++++------ tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 10 +++++++ 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.47.3

1 month

[PATCH v3 0/9] selftests: ublk: add user copy test cases

by Caleb Sander Mateos

Fix some existing issues in the ublk selftest suite and add coverage for user copy, which is currently untested. v3: - Add patch from Ming to actually implement --auto_zc_fallback - Add missing -z to --auto_zc_fallback test case in stress_04 v2: - Allow --zero_copy and --auto_zc to coexist for --auto_zc_fallback - Don't add test cases to test_stress_05.sh as it's close to the timeout - Add Reviewed-By tags Caleb Sander Mateos (8): selftests: ublk: correct last_rw map type in seq_io.bt selftests: ublk: remove unused ios map in seq_io.bt selftests: ublk: fix fio arguments in run_io_and_recover() selftests: ublk: use auto_zc for PER_IO_DAEMON tests in stress_04 selftests: ublk: don't share backing files between ublk servers selftests: ublk: forbid multiple data copy modes selftests: ublk: add support for user copy to kublk selftests: ublk: add user copy test cases Ming Lei (1): selftests: ublk: fix overflow in ublk_queue_auto_zc_fallback() tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile | 8 +++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c | 7 +- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++-- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h | 23 +++++-- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/stripe.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_common.sh | 5 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_04.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_05.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_11.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_14.sh | 40 ++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_06.sh | 25 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_07.sh | 21 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_null_03.sh | 24 +++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_04.sh | 12 ++-- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh | 10 +-- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_06.sh | 39 +++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_07.sh | 39 +++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_05.sh | 26 ++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_06.sh | 21 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/trace/seq_io.bt | 3 +- 20 files changed, 342 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_14.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_06.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_07.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_null_03.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_06.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_07.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_05.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_06.sh -- 2.45.2

1 month

[PATCH 0/8] selftests: ublk: add user copy test cases

by Caleb Sander Mateos

Fix some existing issues in the ublk selftest suite and add coverage for user copy, which is currently untested. Caleb Sander Mateos (8): selftests: ublk: correct last_rw map type in seq_io.bt selftests: ublk: remove unused ios map in seq_io.bt selftests: ublk: fix fio arguments in run_io_and_recover() selftests: ublk: use auto_zc for PER_IO_DAEMON tests in stress_04 selftests: ublk: don't share backing files between ublk servers selftests: ublk: forbid multiple data copy modes selftests: ublk: add support for user copy to kublk selftests: ublk: add user copy test cases tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile | 8 ++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c | 7 +- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c | 74 +++++++++++++++---- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h | 11 +++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/stripe.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_common.sh | 5 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_04.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_05.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_09.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_11.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_14.sh | 40 ++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_06.sh | 25 +++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_07.sh | 21 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_null_03.sh | 24 ++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_03.sh | 4 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_04.sh | 14 ++-- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh | 17 +++-- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_06.sh | 39 ++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_07.sh | 39 ++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_05.sh | 26 +++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_06.sh | 21 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/trace/seq_io.bt | 3 +- 22 files changed, 350 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_14.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_06.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_07.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_null_03.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_06.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_07.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_05.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_06.sh -- 2.45.2

1 month

[PATCH v2 0/8] selftests: ublk: add user copy test cases

by Caleb Sander Mateos

Fix some existing issues in the ublk selftest suite and add coverage for user copy, which is currently untested. v2: - Allow --zero_copy and --auto_zc to coexist for --auto_zc_fallback - Don't add test cases to test_stress_05.sh as it's close to the timeout - Add Reviewed-By tags Caleb Sander Mateos (8): selftests: ublk: correct last_rw map type in seq_io.bt selftests: ublk: remove unused ios map in seq_io.bt selftests: ublk: fix fio arguments in run_io_and_recover() selftests: ublk: use auto_zc for PER_IO_DAEMON tests in stress_04 selftests: ublk: don't share backing files between ublk servers selftests: ublk: forbid multiple data copy modes selftests: ublk: add support for user copy to kublk selftests: ublk: add user copy test cases tools/testing/selftests/ublk/Makefile | 8 +++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/file_backed.c | 7 +- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++-- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.h | 11 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/stripe.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_common.sh | 5 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_04.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_05.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_11.sh | 2 +- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_14.sh | 40 ++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_06.sh | 25 ++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_07.sh | 21 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_null_03.sh | 24 +++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_04.sh | 12 ++-- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh | 10 +-- .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_06.sh | 39 +++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_07.sh | 39 +++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_05.sh | 26 ++++++++ .../testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_06.sh | 21 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/ublk/trace/seq_io.bt | 3 +- 20 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_14.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_06.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_loop_07.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_null_03.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_06.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_07.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_05.sh create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stripe_06.sh -- 2.45.2

1 month

[PATCH v5 0/7] platform/chrome: Fix a possible UAF via revocable

by Tzung-Bi Shih

This is a follow-up series of [1]. It tries to fix a possible UAF in the fops of cros_ec_chardev after the underlying protocol device has gone by using revocable. The 1st patch introduces the revocable which is an implementation of ideas from the talk [2]. The 2nd and 3rd patches add test cases for revocable in Kunit and selftest. The 4th patch converts existing protocol devices to resource providers of cros_ec_device. The 5th - 7th are PoC patches for showing the use case of "Replace file operations" below. --- I came out with 2 possible usages of revocable. 1. Use primitive APIs Use the primitive APIs of revocable directly. The file operations make sure the resources are available when using them. This is what the series original proposed[3][4]. Even though it has the finest grain for accessing the resources, it makes the user code verbose. Per feedback from the community, I'm looking for some subsystem level helpers so that user code can be simlper. 2. Replace file operations Replace filp->f_op to revocable-aware warppers. The warppers make sure the resources are available in the file operations. The user code needs to provide a callback .try_access() to tell the wrappers where/how to *save* the pointers of resources. Known drawback: - The warppers reserve the resources for all file operations even if they might be unused. - The user code still needs to be revocable-aware. - The whole file operation becomes a SRCU read-side critical section. Are there any functions can't be called in the critical section? If there is, the file operations may not be awared of that. See 5th - 7th patches for an example usage. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250721044456.2736300-6-tzungbi@ke… [2] https://lpc.events/event/17/contributions/1627/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250912081718.3827390-5-tzungbi@ke… [4] https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250912081718.3827390-6-tzungbi@ke… v5: - Rebase onto next-20251015. - Add more context about the PoC. - Support multiple revocable providers in the PoC. v4: https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250923075302.591026-1-tzungbi@ker… - Rebase onto next-20250922. - Remove the 5th patch from v3. - Add fops replacement PoC in 5th - 7th patches. v3: https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250912081718.3827390-1-tzungbi@ke… - Rebase onto https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250828083601.856083-1-tzungbi@ker… and next-20250912. - The 4th patch changed accordingly. v2: https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250820081645.847919-1-tzungbi@ker… - Rename "ref_proxy" -> "revocable". - Add test cases in Kunit and selftest. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/20250814091020.1302888-1-tzungbi@ke… Tzung-Bi Shih (7): revocable: Revocable resource management revocable: Add Kunit test cases selftests: revocable: Add kselftest cases platform/chrome: Protect cros_ec_device lifecycle with revocable revocable: Add fops replacement char: misc: Leverage revocable fops replacement platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Secure cros_ec_device via revocable .../driver-api/driver-model/index.rst | 1 + .../driver-api/driver-model/revocable.rst | 87 +++++++ MAINTAINERS | 9 + drivers/base/Kconfig | 8 + drivers/base/Makefile | 5 +- drivers/base/revocable.c | 233 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/base/revocable_test.c | 110 +++++++++ drivers/char/misc.c | 8 + drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec.c | 5 + drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_chardev.c | 22 +- fs/Makefile | 2 +- fs/fs_revocable.c | 154 ++++++++++++ include/linux/fs.h | 2 + include/linux/fs_revocable.h | 21 ++ include/linux/miscdevice.h | 4 + include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h | 4 + include/linux/revocable.h | 53 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/drivers/base/revocable/Makefile | 7 + .../drivers/base/revocable/revocable_test.c | 116 +++++++++ .../drivers/base/revocable/test-revocable.sh | 39 +++ .../base/revocable/test_modules/Makefile | 10 + .../revocable/test_modules/revocable_test.c | 188 ++++++++++++++ 23 files changed, 1086 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/revocable.rst create mode 100644 drivers/base/revocable.c create mode 100644 drivers/base/revocable_test.c create mode 100644 fs/fs_revocable.c create mode 100644 include/linux/fs_revocable.h create mode 100644 include/linux/revocable.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/base/revocable/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/base/revocable/revocable_test.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/base/revocable/test-revocable.sh create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/base/revocable/test_modules/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/drivers/base/revocable/test_modules/revocable_test.c -- 2.51.0.788.g6d19910ace-goog

1 month

[PATCH] selftests: iommu: fix Warray-bounds in get_hw_info test

by Kathara Sasikumar

The get_hw_info uses a smaller user buffer on purpose to check how the kernel updates only the fields that fit in the buffer. The test created a custom smaller struct for this, but the helper function later treats the buffer as struct iommu_test_hw_info. This makes the compiler warn about a possible out-of-bounds access (-Warray-bounds). This keeps the test behavior the same and removes the warning. Signed-off-by: Kathara Sasikumar <katharasasikumar007(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c index 10e051b6f592..f6aceb65313f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c @@ -755,9 +755,7 @@ TEST_F(iommufd_ioas, get_hw_info) struct iommu_test_hw_info info; uint64_t trailing_bytes; } buffer_larger; - struct iommu_test_hw_info_buffer_smaller { - __u32 flags; - } buffer_smaller; + struct iommu_test_hw_info buffer_smaller; if (self->device_id) { uint8_t max_pasid = 0; -- 2.51.0

1 month

[PATCH] iommufd/selftest: Make it clearer to gcc that the access is not out of bounds

by Jason Gunthorpe

GCC gets a bit confused and reports: In function '_test_cmd_get_hw_info', inlined from 'iommufd_ioas_get_hw_info' at iommufd.c:779:3, inlined from 'wrapper_iommufd_ioas_get_hw_info' at iommufd.c:752:1: >> iommufd_utils.h:804:37: warning: array subscript 'struct iommu_test_hw_info[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct iommu_test_hw_info_buffer_smaller[1]' [-Warray-bounds=] 804 | assert(!info->flags); | ~~~~^~~~~~~ iommufd.c: In function 'wrapper_iommufd_ioas_get_hw_info': iommufd.c:761:11: note: object 'buffer_smaller' of size 4 761 | } buffer_smaller; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ While it is true that "struct iommu_test_hw_info[0]" is partly out of bounds of the input pointer, it is not true that info->flags is out of bounds. Unclear why it warns on this. Reuse an existing properly sized stack buffer and pass a truncated length instead to test the same thing. Fixes: af4fde93c319 ("iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for IOMMU_GET_HW_INFO ioctl") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512032344.kaAcKFIM-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)nvidia.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c index 10e051b6f592df..dadad277f4eb2e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c @@ -755,9 +755,6 @@ TEST_F(iommufd_ioas, get_hw_info) struct iommu_test_hw_info info; uint64_t trailing_bytes; } buffer_larger; - struct iommu_test_hw_info_buffer_smaller { - __u32 flags; - } buffer_smaller; if (self->device_id) { uint8_t max_pasid = 0; @@ -789,8 +786,9 @@ TEST_F(iommufd_ioas, get_hw_info) * the fields within the size range still gets updated. */ test_cmd_get_hw_info(self->device_id, - IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT, - &buffer_smaller, sizeof(buffer_smaller)); + IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT, &buffer_exact, + offsetofend(struct iommu_test_hw_info, + flags)); test_cmd_get_hw_info_pasid(self->device_id, &max_pasid); ASSERT_EQ(0, max_pasid); if (variant->pasid_capable) { base-commit: 93013488dd77dd2ea8bd23355a5587d9e6dac185 -- 2.43.0

1 month

Re: sea_to_user sefltest failure

by Marc Zyngier

On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 18:04:48 +0000, Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan(a)google.com> wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>] > Hi Sebastian, > > CONFIGs seem alright to me. Do you boot kernel with cmdline options like > "default_hugepagesz=1G hugepagesz=1G hugepages=64", or dynamically set up > huge pages via "echo 64 > > /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages"? I don't think this is irrelevant. The whole thing seems to have some logic flaws, see the extensive report from Zenghui[1] as a reply to your series. M. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/3061f5f8-cef0-b7b1-c4de-f2ceea29af9a@huawei.com -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

1 month

sea_to_user sefltest failure

by Sebastian Ott

Hi, sea_to_user fails for me with: Random seed: 0x6b8b4567 ==== Test Assertion Failure ==== include/kvm_syscalls.h:58: mem != MAP_FAILED pid=4923 tid=4923 errno=12 - Cannot allocate memory 1 0x0000000000405afb: __kvm_mmap at kvm_syscalls.h:58 (discriminator 3) 2 (inlined by) kvm_mmap at kvm_syscalls.h:65 (discriminator 3) 3 (inlined by) vm_mem_add at kvm_util.c:1036 (discriminator 3) 4 0x0000000000402377: vm_create_with_sea_handler at sea_to_user.c:278 5 (inlined by) main at sea_to_user.c:324 6 0x0000ffff8d0a621b: ?? ??:0 7 0x0000ffff8d0a62fb: ?? ??:0 8 0x000000000040282f: _start at ??:? mmap() failed, rc: -1 errno: 12 (Cannot allocate memory) this could be related to my config? # CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB is not set CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP=y CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC=y CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE=y CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION=y # CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO is not set CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_ALWAYS is not set CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_MADVISE=y # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_NEVER is not set CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_SHMEM_HUGE_NEVER=y # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_SHMEM_HUGE_ALWAYS is not set # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_SHMEM_HUGE_WITHIN_SIZE is not set # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_SHMEM_HUGE_ADVISE is not set CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_TMPFS_HUGE_NEVER=y # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_TMPFS_HUGE_ALWAYS is not set # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_TMPFS_HUGE_WITHIN_SIZE is not set # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_TMPFS_HUGE_ADVISE is not set CONFIG_PGTABLE_HAS_HUGE_LEAVES=y CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGE_PFNMAP=y CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_HUGETLBFS=y CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE=y CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING=y Looking at the code smth like this would skip the test: get_backing_src_pagesz(VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS_HUGETLB); ..or is this not worth the effort and my config is too weird? Thanks, Sebastian

1 month

[PATCH v25 00/28] riscv control-flow integrity for usermode

by Deepak Gupta via B4 Relay

v25: Removal of `riscv_nousercfi` from `cpufeature.c` and instead placing it as extern in `usercfi.h` was leading to build error whene cfi config is not selected. Placed `riscv_nousercfi` outside cfi config ifdef block in `usercfi.h` v24: Took PaulW suggestion for fixing commit desc and checkpatch fixes in patch #21. "riscv: kernel command line option to opt out of user cfi" Collected "Tested-by" tags from Andreas and Valentin. Thanks a lot for testing it. v23: fixed some of the "CHECK:" reported on checkpatch --strict. Accepted Joel's suggestion for kselftest's Makefile. CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is enabled when zicfiss, zicfilp and fcf-protection are all present in toolchain v22: fixing build error due to -march=zicfiss being picked in gcc-13 and above but not actually doing any codegen or recognizing instruction for zicfiss. Change in v22 makes dependence on `-fcf-protection=full` compiler flag to ensure that toolchain has support and then only CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI will be visible in menuconfig. v21: fixed build errors. Basics and overview =================== Software with larger attack surfaces (e.g. network facing apps like databases, browsers or apps relying on browser runtimes) suffer from memory corruption issues which can be utilized by attackers to bend control flow of the program to eventually gain control (by making their payload executable). Attackers are able to perform such attacks by leveraging call-sites which rely on indirect calls or return sites which rely on obtaining return address from stack memory. To mitigate such attacks, risc-v extension zicfilp enforces that all indirect calls must land on a landing pad instruction `lpad` else cpu will raise software check exception (a new cpu exception cause code on riscv). Similarly for return flow, risc-v extension zicfiss extends architecture with - `sspush` instruction to push return address on a shadow stack - `sspopchk` instruction to pop return address from shadow stack and compare with input operand (i.e. return address on stack) - `sspopchk` to raise software check exception if comparision above was a mismatch - Protection mechanism using which shadow stack is not writeable via regular store instructions More information an details can be found at extensions github repo [1]. Equivalent to landing pad (zicfilp) on x86 is `ENDBRANCH` instruction in Intel CET [3] and branch target identification (BTI) [4] on arm. Similarly x86's Intel CET has shadow stack [5] and arm64 has guarded control stack (GCS) [6] which are very similar to risc-v's zicfiss shadow stack. x86 and arm64 support for user mode shadow stack is already in mainline. Kernel awareness for user control flow integrity ================================================ This series picks up Samuel Holland's envcfg changes [2] as well. So if those are being applied independently, they should be removed from this series. Enabling: In order to maintain compatibility and not break anything in user mode, kernel doesn't enable control flow integrity cpu extensions on binary by default. Instead exposes a prctl interface to enable, disable and lock the shadow stack or landing pad feature for a task. This allows userspace (loader) to enumerate if all objects in its address space are compiled with shadow stack and landing pad support and accordingly enable the feature. Additionally if a subsequent `dlopen` happens on a library, user mode can take a decision again to disable the feature (if incoming library is not compiled with support) OR terminate the task (if user mode policy is strict to have all objects in address space to be compiled with control flow integirty cpu feature). prctl to enable shadow stack results in allocating shadow stack from virtual memory and activating for user address space. x86 and arm64 are also following same direction due to similar reason(s). clone/fork: On clone and fork, cfi state for task is inherited by child. Shadow stack is part of virtual memory and is a writeable memory from kernel perspective (writeable via a restricted set of instructions aka shadow stack instructions) Thus kernel changes ensure that this memory is converted into read-only when fork/clone happens and COWed when fault is taken due to sspush, sspopchk or ssamoswap. In case `CLONE_VM` is specified and shadow stack is to be enabled, kernel will automatically allocate a shadow stack for that clone call. map_shadow_stack: x86 introduced `map_shadow_stack` system call to allow user space to explicitly map shadow stack memory in its address space. It is useful to allocate shadow for different contexts managed by a single thread (green threads or contexts) risc-v implements this system call as well. signal management: If shadow stack is enabled for a task, kernel performs an asynchronous control flow diversion to deliver the signal and eventually expects userspace to issue sigreturn so that original execution can be resumed. Even though resume context is prepared by kernel, it is in user space memory and is subject to memory corruption and corruption bugs can be utilized by attacker in this race window to perform arbitrary sigreturn and eventually bypass cfi mechanism. Another issue is how to ensure that cfi related state on sigcontext area is not trampled by legacy apps or apps compiled with old kernel headers. In order to mitigate control-flow hijacting, kernel prepares a token and place it on shadow stack before signal delivery and places address of token in sigcontext structure. During sigreturn, kernel obtains address of token from sigcontext struture, reads token from shadow stack and validates it and only then allow sigreturn to succeed. Compatiblity issue is solved by adopting dynamic sigcontext management introduced for vector extension. This series re-factor the code little bit to allow future sigcontext management easy (as proposed by Andy Chiu from SiFive) config and compilation: Introduce a new risc-v config option `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI`. Selecting this config option picks the kernel support for user control flow integrity. This optin is presented only if toolchain has shadow stack and landing pad support. And is on purpose guarded by toolchain support. Reason being that eventually vDSO also needs to be compiled in with shadow stack and landing pad support. vDSO compile patches are not included as of now because landing pad labeling scheme is yet to settle for usermode runtime. To get more information on kernel interactions with respect to zicfilp and zicfiss, patch series adds documentation for `zicfilp` and `zicfiss` in following: Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfiss.rst Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst How to test this series ======================= Toolchain --------- $ git clone git@github.com:sifive/riscv-gnu-toolchain.git -b cfi-dev $ riscv-gnu-toolchain/configure --prefix=<path-to-where-to-build> --with-arch=rv64gc_zicfilp_zicfiss --enable-linux --disable-gdb --with-extra-multilib-test="rv64gc_zicfilp_zicfiss-lp64d:-static" $ make -j$(nproc) Qemu ---- Get the lastest qemu $ cd qemu $ mkdir build $ cd build $ ../configure --target-list=riscv64-softmmu $ make -j$(nproc) Opensbi ------- $ git clone git@github.com:deepak0414/opensbi.git -b v6_cfi_spec_split_opensbi $ make CROSS_COMPILE=<your riscv toolchain> -j$(nproc) PLATFORM=generic Linux ----- Running defconfig is fine. CFI is enabled by default if the toolchain supports it. $ make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=<path-to-cfi-riscv-gnu-toolchain>/build/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -j$(nproc) defconfig $ make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=<path-to-cfi-riscv-gnu-toolchain>/build/bin/riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu- -j$(nproc) Running ------- Modify your qemu command to have: -bios <path-to-cfi-opensbi>/build/platform/generic/firmware/fw_dynamic.bin -cpu rv64,zicfilp=true,zicfiss=true,zimop=true,zcmop=true References ========== [1] - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-cfi [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240814081126.956287-1-samuel.holland@sifive.c… [3] - https://lwn.net/Articles/889475/ [4] - https://developer.arm.com/documentation/109576/0100/Branch-Target-Identific… [5] - https://www.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents/catc17-i… [6] - https://lwn.net/Articles/940403/ To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)redhat.com> To: Borislav Petkov <bp(a)alien8.de> To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com> To: x86(a)kernel.org To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa(a)zytor.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> To: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett(a)oracle.com> To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka(a)suse.cz> To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes(a)oracle.com> To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley(a)sifive.com> To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer(a)dabbelt.com> To: Albert Ou <aou(a)eecs.berkeley.edu> To: Conor Dooley <conor(a)kernel.org> To: Rob Herring <robh(a)kernel.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt(a)kernel.org> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de> To: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg(a)redhat.com> To: Eric Biederman <ebiederm(a)xmission.com> To: Kees Cook <kees(a)kernel.org> To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet(a)lwn.net> To: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> To: Jann Horn <jannh(a)google.com> To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt(a)kernel.org> To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda(a)kernel.org> To: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor(a)gmail.com> To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng(a)gmail.com> To: Gary Guo <gary(a)garyguo.net> To: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh(a)protonmail.com> To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin(a)proton.me> To: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg(a)kernel.org> To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl(a)google.com> To: Trevor Gross <tmgross(a)umich.edu> Cc: linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm(a)kvack.org Cc: linux-riscv(a)lists.infradead.org Cc: devicetree(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arch(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-doc(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: alistair.francis(a)wdc.com Cc: richard.henderson(a)linaro.org Cc: jim.shu(a)sifive.com Cc: andybnac(a)gmail.com Cc: kito.cheng(a)sifive.com Cc: charlie(a)rivosinc.com Cc: atishp(a)rivosinc.com Cc: evan(a)rivosinc.com Cc: cleger(a)rivosinc.com Cc: alexghiti(a)rivosinc.com Cc: samitolvanen(a)google.com Cc: broonie(a)kernel.org Cc: rick.p.edgecombe(a)intel.com Cc: rust-for-linux(a)vger.kernel.org changelog --------- v25: - fixed build error when cfi config is not selected due to missing symbol error on `riscv_nousercfi`. v24: - Checkpatch fixes in patch # 21. - Collected "Tested-by" tags. v23: - fixed some of the "CHECK:" reported on checkpatch --strict. - Accepted Joel's suggestion for kselftest's Makefile. - CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is enabled when zicfiss, zicfilp and fcf-protection are all present in toolchain v22: - CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI was by default "n". With dual vdso support it is default "y" (if toolchain supports it). Fixing build error due to "-march=zicfiss" being picked in gcc-13 partially. gcc-13 only recognizes the flag but not actually doing any codegen or recognizing instruction for zicfiss. Change in v22 makes dependence on `-fcf-protection=full` compiler flag to ensure that toolchain has support and then only CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI will be visible in menuconfig. - picked up tags and some cosmetic changes in commit message for dual vdso patch. v21: - Fixing build errors due to changes in arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso.h Using #ifdef instead of IS_ENABLED in arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso.h vdso-cfi-offsets.h should be included only when CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is selected. v20: - rebased on v6.18-rc1. - Added two vDSO support. If `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI` is selected two vDSOs are compiled (one for hardware prior to RVA23 and one for RVA23 onwards). Kernel exposes RVA23 vDSO if hardware/cpu implements zimop else exposes existing vDSO to userspace. - default selection for `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI` is "Yes". - replaced "__ASSEMBLY__" with "__ASSEMBLER__" v19: - riscv_nousercfi was `int`. changed it to unsigned long. Thanks to Alex Ghiti for reporting it. It was a bug. - ELP is cleared on trap entry only when CONFIG_64BIT. - restore ssp back on return to usermode was being done before `riscv_v_context_nesting_end` on trap exit path. If kernel shadow stack were enabled this would result in kernel operating on user shadow stack and panic (as I found in my testing of kcfi patch series). So fixed that. v18: - rebased on 6.16-rc1 - uprobe handling clears ELP in sstatus image in pt_regs - vdso was missing shadow stack elf note for object files. added that. Additional asm file for vdso needed the elf marker flag. toolchain should complain if `-fcf-protection=full` and marker is missing for object generated from asm file. Asked toolchain folks to fix this. Although no reason to gate the merge on that. - Split up compile options for march and fcf-protection in vdso Makefile - CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI option is moved under "Kernel features" menu Added `arch/riscv/configs/hardening.config` fragment which selects CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI v17: - fixed warnings due to empty macros in usercfi.h (reported by alexg) - fixed prefixes in commit titles reported by alexg - took below uprobe with fcfi v2 patch from Zong Li and squashed it with "riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception and uprobe handling" https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250604093403.10916-1-zong.li@sifive.com/ v16: - If FWFT is not implemented or returns error for shadow stack activation, then no_usercfi is set to disable shadow stack. Although this should be picked up by extension validation and activation. Fixed this bug for zicfilp and zicfiss both. Thanks to Charlie Jenkins for reporting this. - If toolchain doesn't support cfi, cfi kselftest shouldn't build. Suggested by Charlie Jenkins. - Default for CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is set to no. Charlie/Atish suggested to keep it off till we have more hardware availibility with RVA23 profile and zimop/zcmop implemented. Else this will start breaking people's workflow - Includes the fix if "!RV64 and !SBI" then definitions for FWFT in asm-offsets.c error. v15: - Toolchain has been updated to include `-fcf-protection` flag. This exists for x86 as well. Updated kernel patches to compile vDSO and selftest to compile with `fcf-protection=full` flag. - selecting CONFIG_RISCV_USERCFI selects CONFIG_RISCV_SBI. - Patch to enable shadow stack for kernel wasn't hidden behind CONFIG_RISCV_USERCFI and CONFIG_RISCV_SBI. fixed that. v14: - rebased on top of palmer/sbi-v3. Thus dropped clement's FWFT patches Updated RISCV_ISA_EXT_XXXX in hwcap and hwprobe constants. - Took Radim's suggestions on bitfields. - Placed cfi_state at the end of thread_info block so that current situation is not disturbed with respect to member fields of thread_info in single cacheline. v13: - cpu_supports_shadow_stack/cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr uses riscv_has_extension_unlikely() - uses nops(count) to create nop slide - RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER is not needed in `amo_user_shstk`. Removed it - changed ternaries to simply use implicit casting to convert to bool. - kernel command line allows to disable zicfilp and zicfiss independently. updated kernel-parameters.txt. - ptrace user abi for cfi uses bitmasks instead of bitfields. Added ptrace kselftest. - cosmetic and grammatical changes to documentation. v12: - It seems like I had accidently squashed arch agnostic indirect branch tracking prctl and riscv implementation of those prctls. Split them again. - set_shstk_status/set_indir_lp_status perform CSR writes only when CPU support is available. As suggested by Zong Li. - Some minor clean up in kselftests as suggested by Zong Li. v11: - patch "arch/riscv: compile vdso with landing pad" was unconditionally selecting `_zicfilp` for vDSO compile. fixed that. Changed `lpad 1` to to `lpad 0`. v10: - dropped "mm: helper `is_shadow_stack_vma` to check shadow stack vma". This patch is not that interesting to this patch series for risc-v. There are instances in arch directories where VM_SHADOW_STACK flag is anyways used. Dropping this patch to expedite merging in riscv tree. - Took suggestions from `Clement` on "riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration" to validate presence of cfi based on config. - Added a patch for vDSO to have `lpad 0`. I had omitted this earlier to make sure we add single vdso object with cfi enabled. But a vdso object with scheme of zero labeled landing pad is least common denominator and should work with all objects of zero labeled as well as function-signature labeled objects. v9: - rebased on master (39a803b754d5 fix braino in "9p: fix ->rename_sem exclusion") - dropped "mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK" (master has it from arm64/gcs) - dropped "prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for shadow stack" (master has it from arm64/gcs) v8: - rebased on palmer/for-next - dropped samuel holland's `envcfg` context switch patches. they are in parlmer/for-next v7: - Removed "riscv/Kconfig: enable HAVE_EXIT_THREAD for riscv" Instead using `deactivate_mm` flow to clean up. see here for more context https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230908203655.543765-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.… - Changed the header include in `kselftest`. Hopefully this fixes compile issue faced by Zong Li at SiFive. - Cleaned up an orphaned change to `mm/mmap.c` in below patch "riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE" - Lock interfaces for shadow stack and indirect branch tracking expect arg == 0 Any future evolution of this interface should accordingly define how arg should be setup. - `mm/map.c` has an instance of using `VM_SHADOW_STACK`. Fixed it to use helper `is_shadow_stack_vma`. - Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008-v5_user_cfi_series-v6-0-60d9fe073f37@riv… v6: - Picked up Samuel Holland's changes as is with `envcfg` placed in `thread` instead of `thread_info` - fixed unaligned newline escapes in kselftest - cleaned up messages in kselftest and included test output in commit message - fixed a bug in clone path reported by Zong Li - fixed a build issue if CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V is not selected (this was introduced due to re-factoring signal context management code) v5: - rebased on v6.12-rc1 - Fixed schema related issues in device tree file - Fixed some of the documentation related issues in zicfilp/ss.rst (style issues and added index) - added `SHADOW_STACK_SET_MARKER` so that implementation can define base of shadow stack. - Fixed warnings on definitions added in usercfi.h when CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI is not selected. - Adopted context header based signal handling as proposed by Andy Chiu - Added support for enabling kernel mode access to shadow stack using FWFT (https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/src/ext-firmware…) - Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001-v5_user_cfi_series-v1-0-3ba65b6e550f@riv… (Note: I had an issue in my workflow due to which version number wasn't picked up correctly while sending out patches) v4: - rebased on 6.11-rc6 - envcfg: Converged with Samuel Holland's patches for envcfg management on per- thread basis. - vma_is_shadow_stack is renamed to is_vma_shadow_stack - picked up Mark Brown's `ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK` patch - signal context: using extended context management to maintain compatibility. - fixed `-Wmissing-prototypes` compiler warnings for prctl functions - Documentation fixes and amending typos. - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912231650.3740732-1-debug@rivosinc.com/ v3: - envcfg logic to pick up base envcfg had a bug where `ENVCFG_CBZE` could have been picked on per task basis, even though CPU didn't implement it. Fixed in this series. - dt-bindings As suggested, split into separate commit. fixed the messaging that spec is in public review - arch_is_shadow_stack change arch_is_shadow_stack changed to vma_is_shadow_stack - hwprobe zicfiss / zicfilp if present will get enumerated in hwprobe - selftests As suggested, added object and binary filenames to .gitignore Selftest binary anyways need to be compiled with cfi enabled compiler which will make sure that landing pad and shadow stack are enabled. Thus removed separate enable/disable tests. Cleaned up tests a bit. - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240403234054.2020347-1-debug@rivosinc.com/ v2: - Using config `CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI`, kernel support for riscv control flow integrity for user mode programs can be compiled in the kernel. - Enabling of control flow integrity for user programs is left to user runtime - This patch series introduces arch agnostic `prctls` to enable shadow stack and indirect branch tracking. And implements them on riscv. --- Changes in v25: - Link to v24: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251204-v5_user_cfi_series-v24-0-ada7a3ba14dc@ri… Changes in v24: - Link to v23: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251112-v5_user_cfi_series-v23-0-b55691eacf4f@ri… Changes in v23: - Link to v22: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251023-v5_user_cfi_series-v22-0-1935270f7636@ri… Changes in v22: - Link to v21: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251015-v5_user_cfi_series-v21-0-6a07856e90e7@ri… Changes in v21: - Link to v20: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251013-v5_user_cfi_series-v20-0-b9de4be9912e@ri… Changes in v20: - Link to v19: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250731-v5_user_cfi_series-v19-0-09b468d7beab@ri… Changes in v19: - Link to v18: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250711-v5_user_cfi_series-v18-0-a8ee62f9f38e@ri… Changes in v18: - Link to v17: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250604-v5_user_cfi_series-v17-0-4565c2cf869f@ri… Changes in v17: - Link to v16: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250522-v5_user_cfi_series-v16-0-64f61a35eee7@ri… Changes in v16: - Link to v15: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250502-v5_user_cfi_series-v15-0-914966471885@ri… Changes in v15: - changelog posted just below cover letter - Link to v14: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250429-v5_user_cfi_series-v14-0-5239410d012a@ri… Changes in v14: - changelog posted just below cover letter - Link to v13: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250424-v5_user_cfi_series-v13-0-971437de586a@ri… Changes in v13: - changelog posted just below cover letter - Link to v12: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250314-v5_user_cfi_series-v12-0-e51202b53138@ri… Changes in v12: - changelog posted just below cover letter - Link to v11: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250310-v5_user_cfi_series-v11-0-86b36cbfb910@ri… Changes in v11: - changelog posted just below cover letter - Link to v10: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-v5_user_cfi_series-v10-0-163dcfa31c60@ri… --- Andy Chiu (1): riscv: signal: abstract header saving for setup_sigcontext Deepak Gupta (26): mm: VM_SHADOW_STACK definition for riscv dt-bindings: riscv: zicfilp and zicfiss in dt-bindings (extensions.yaml) riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp enumeration riscv: zicfiss / zicfilp extension csr and bit definitions riscv: usercfi state for task and save/restore of CSR_SSP on trap entry/exit riscv/mm : ensure PROT_WRITE leads to VM_READ | VM_WRITE riscv/mm: manufacture shadow stack pte riscv/mm: teach pte_mkwrite to manufacture shadow stack PTEs riscv/mm: write protect and shadow stack riscv/mm: Implement map_shadow_stack() syscall riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking riscv: Implements arch agnostic indirect branch tracking prctls riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception and uprobe handling riscv/signal: save and restore of shadow stack for signal riscv/kernel: update __show_regs to print shadow stack register riscv/ptrace: riscv cfi status and state via ptrace and in core files riscv/hwprobe: zicfilp / zicfiss enumeration in hwprobe riscv: kernel command line option to opt out of user cfi riscv: enable kernel access to shadow stack memory via FWFT sbi call arch/riscv: dual vdso creation logic and select vdso based on hw riscv: create a config for shadow stack and landing pad instr support riscv: Documentation for landing pad / indirect branch tracking riscv: Documentation for shadow stack on riscv kselftest/riscv: kselftest for user mode cfi Jim Shu (1): arch/riscv: compile vdso with landing pad and shadow stack note Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 + Documentation/arch/riscv/index.rst | 2 + Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfilp.rst | 115 +++++ Documentation/arch/riscv/zicfiss.rst | 179 +++++++ .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/extensions.yaml | 14 + arch/riscv/Kconfig | 22 + arch/riscv/Makefile | 8 +- arch/riscv/configs/hardening.config | 4 + arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/assembler.h | 44 ++ arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 12 + arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h | 16 + arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/asm/mman.h | 26 + arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 7 + arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h | 30 +- arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 3 + arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 97 ++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso.h | 13 +- arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 3 + arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 34 ++ arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 2 + arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 10 + arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 25 + arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 38 ++ arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 27 + arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 27 +- arch/riscv/kernel/ptrace.c | 95 ++++ arch/riscv/kernel/signal.c | 148 +++++- arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 2 + arch/riscv/kernel/sys_riscv.c | 10 + arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 54 ++ arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 545 +++++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 7 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 40 +- arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/flush_icache.S | 4 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/gen_vdso_offsets.sh | 4 +- arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/getcpu.S | 4 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/note.S | 3 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/rt_sigreturn.S | 4 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/sys_hwprobe.S | 4 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha.S | 5 +- arch/riscv/kernel/vdso_cfi/Makefile | 25 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso_cfi/vdso-cfi.S | 11 + arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 2 +- arch/riscv/mm/pgtable.c | 16 + include/linux/cpu.h | 4 + include/linux/mm.h | 7 + include/uapi/linux/elf.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 27 + kernel/sys.c | 30 ++ tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/.gitignore | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/Makefile | 23 + tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfi_rv_test.h | 82 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/cfitests.c | 173 +++++++ tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.c | 385 +++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/riscv/cfi/shadowstack.h | 27 + 62 files changed, 2481 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 3a8660878839faadb4f1a6dd72c3179c1df56787 change-id: 20240930-v5_user_cfi_series-3dc332f8f5b2 -- - debug

1 month

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror