- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.18 006/159] selftests/bpf: Fix vfs_link kprobe definition

by Sasha Levin

From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> [ Upstream commit e299bcd4d16ff86f46c48df1062c8aae0eca1ed8 ] Since commit 6521f8917082 ("namei: prepare for idmapped mounts") vfs_link's prototype was changed, the kprobe definition in profiler selftest in turn wasn't updated. The result is that all argument after the first are now stored in different registers. This means that self-test has been broken ever since. Fix it by updating the kprobe definition accordingly. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220331140949.1410056-1-nborisov@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h index 4896fdf816f7..92331053dba3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/profiler.inc.h @@ -826,8 +826,9 @@ int kprobe_ret__do_filp_open(struct pt_regs* ctx) SEC("kprobe/vfs_link") int BPF_KPROBE(kprobe__vfs_link, - struct dentry* old_dentry, struct inode* dir, - struct dentry* new_dentry, struct inode** delegated_inode) + struct dentry* old_dentry, struct user_namespace *mnt_userns, + struct inode* dir, struct dentry* new_dentry, + struct inode** delegated_inode) { struct bpf_func_stats_ctx stats_ctx; bpf_stats_enter(&stats_ctx, profiler_bpf_vfs_link); -- 2.35.1

2 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH net v2] net/ipv6: Expand and rename accept_unsolicited_na to accept_untracked_na

by Arun Ajith S

RFC 9131 changes default behaviour of handling RX of NA messages when the corresponding entry is absent in the neighbour cache. The current implementation is limited to accept just unsolicited NAs. However, the RFC is more generic where it also accepts solicited NAs. Both types should result in adding a STALE entry for this case. Expand accept_untracked_na behaviour to also accept solicited NAs to be compliant with the RFC and rename the sysctl knob to accept_untracked_na. Fixes: f9a2fb73318e ("net/ipv6: Introduce accept_unsolicited_na knob to implement router-side changes for RFC9131") Signed-off-by: Arun Ajith S <aajith(a)arista.com> --- This change updates the accept_unsolicited_na feature that merged to net-next for v5.19 to be better compliant with the RFC. It also involves renaming the sysctl knob to accept_untracked_na before shipping in a release. Note that the behaviour table has been modifed in the code comments, but dropped from the Documentation. This is because the table documents behaviour that is not unique to the knob, and it is more relevant to understanding the code. The documentation has been updated to be unambiguous even without the table. v2: 1. Changed commit message and subject as suggested. 2. Added Fixes tag. 3. Used en-uk spellings consistently. 4. Added a couple of missing comments. 5. Refactored patch to be smaller by avoiding early return. 6. Made the documentation more clearer. Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 23 ++++------- include/linux/ipv6.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/ipv6.h | 2 +- net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 +-- net/ipv6/ndisc.c | 41 +++++++++++-------- .../net/ndisc_unsolicited_na_test.sh | 23 +++++------ 6 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst index b882d4238581..04216564a03c 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst @@ -2474,21 +2474,16 @@ drop_unsolicited_na - BOOLEAN By default this is turned off. -accept_unsolicited_na - BOOLEAN - Add a new neighbour cache entry in STALE state for routers on receiving an - unsolicited neighbour advertisement with target link-layer address option - specified. This is as per router-side behavior documented in RFC9131. - This has lower precedence than drop_unsolicited_na. +accept_untracked_na - BOOLEAN + Add a new neighbour cache entry in STALE state for routers on receiving a + neighbour advertisement (either solicited or unsolicited) with target + link-layer address option specified if no neighbour entry is already + present for the advertised IPv6 address. Without this knob, NAs received + for untracked addresses (absent in neighbour cache) are silently ignored. + + This is as per router-side behaviour documented in RFC9131. - ==== ====== ====== ============================================== - drop accept fwding behaviour - ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------------- - 1 X X Drop NA packet and don't pass up the stack - 0 0 X Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC - 0 1 0 Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC - 0 1 1 Pass NA packet up the stack, and add a STALE - NC entry - ==== ====== ====== ============================================== + This has lower precedence than drop_unsolicited_na. This will optimize the return path for the initial off-link communication that is initiated by a directly connected host, by ensuring that diff --git a/include/linux/ipv6.h b/include/linux/ipv6.h index 38c8203d52cb..37dfdcfcdd54 100644 --- a/include/linux/ipv6.h +++ b/include/linux/ipv6.h @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct ipv6_devconf { __s32 suppress_frag_ndisc; __s32 accept_ra_mtu; __s32 drop_unsolicited_na; - __s32 accept_unsolicited_na; + __s32 accept_untracked_na; struct ipv6_stable_secret { bool initialized; struct in6_addr secret; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ipv6.h b/include/uapi/linux/ipv6.h index 549ddeaf788b..03cdbe798fe3 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/ipv6.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ipv6.h @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ enum { DEVCONF_IOAM6_ID, DEVCONF_IOAM6_ID_WIDE, DEVCONF_NDISC_EVICT_NOCARRIER, - DEVCONF_ACCEPT_UNSOLICITED_NA, + DEVCONF_ACCEPT_UNTRACKED_NA, DEVCONF_MAX }; diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c index ca0aa744593e..1b1932502e9e 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c @@ -5586,7 +5586,7 @@ static inline void ipv6_store_devconf(struct ipv6_devconf *cnf, array[DEVCONF_IOAM6_ID] = cnf->ioam6_id; array[DEVCONF_IOAM6_ID_WIDE] = cnf->ioam6_id_wide; array[DEVCONF_NDISC_EVICT_NOCARRIER] = cnf->ndisc_evict_nocarrier; - array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_UNSOLICITED_NA] = cnf->accept_unsolicited_na; + array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_UNTRACKED_NA] = cnf->accept_untracked_na; } static inline size_t inet6_ifla6_size(void) @@ -7038,8 +7038,8 @@ static const struct ctl_table addrconf_sysctl[] = { .extra2 = (void *)SYSCTL_ONE, }, { - .procname = "accept_unsolicited_na", - .data = &ipv6_devconf.accept_unsolicited_na, + .procname = "accept_untracked_na", + .data = &ipv6_devconf.accept_untracked_na, .maxlen = sizeof(int), .mode = 0644, .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax, diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c index 254addad0dd3..ed0bbe87e345 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c @@ -979,7 +979,6 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb) struct inet6_dev *idev = __in6_dev_get(dev); struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp; struct neighbour *neigh; - bool create_neigh; if (skb->len < sizeof(struct nd_msg)) { ND_PRINTK(2, warn, "NA: packet too short\n"); @@ -1000,7 +999,7 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb) /* For some 802.11 wireless deployments (and possibly other networks), * there will be a NA proxy and unsolicitd packets are attacks * and thus should not be accepted. - * drop_unsolicited_na takes precedence over accept_unsolicited_na + * drop_unsolicited_na takes precedence over accept_untracked_na */ if (!msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited && idev && idev->cnf.drop_unsolicited_na) @@ -1041,25 +1040,33 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb) in6_ifa_put(ifp); return; } + + neigh = neigh_lookup(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, dev); + /* RFC 9131 updates original Neighbour Discovery RFC 4861. - * An unsolicited NA can now create a neighbour cache entry - * on routers if it has Target LL Address option. + * NAs with Target LL Address option without a corresponding + * entry in the neighbour cache can now create a STALE neighbour + * cache entry on routers. + * + * entry accept fwding solicited behaviour + * ------- ------ ------ --------- ---------------------- + * present X X 0 Set state to STALE + * present X X 1 Set state to REACHABLE + * absent 0 X X Do nothing + * absent 1 0 X Do nothing + * absent 1 1 X Add a new STALE entry * - * drop accept fwding behaviour - * ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------------- - * 1 X X Drop NA packet and don't pass up the stack - * 0 0 X Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC - * 0 1 0 Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC - * 0 1 1 Pass NA packet up the stack, and add a STALE - * NC entry * Note that we don't do a (daddr == all-routers-mcast) check. */ - create_neigh = !msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited && lladdr && - idev && idev->cnf.forwarding && - idev->cnf.accept_unsolicited_na; - neigh = __neigh_lookup(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, dev, create_neigh); + new_state = msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited ? NUD_REACHABLE : NUD_STALE; + if (!neigh && lladdr && + idev && idev->cnf.forwarding && + idev->cnf.accept_untracked_na) { + neigh = neigh_create(&nd_tbl, &msg->target, dev); + new_state = NUD_STALE; + } - if (neigh) { + if (neigh && !IS_ERR(neigh)) { u8 old_flags = neigh->flags; struct net *net = dev_net(dev); @@ -1079,7 +1086,7 @@ static void ndisc_recv_na(struct sk_buff *skb) } ndisc_update(dev, neigh, lladdr, - msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited ? NUD_REACHABLE : NUD_STALE, + new_state, NEIGH_UPDATE_F_WEAK_OVERRIDE| (msg->icmph.icmp6_override ? NEIGH_UPDATE_F_OVERRIDE : 0)| NEIGH_UPDATE_F_OVERRIDE_ISROUTER| diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ndisc_unsolicited_na_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ndisc_unsolicited_na_test.sh index f508657ee126..86e621b7b9c7 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ndisc_unsolicited_na_test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ndisc_unsolicited_na_test.sh @@ -1,15 +1,14 @@ #!/bin/bash # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -# This test is for the accept_unsolicited_na feature to +# This test is for the accept_untracked_na feature to # enable RFC9131 behaviour. The following is the test-matrix. # drop accept fwding behaviour # ---- ------ ------ ---------------------------------------------- -# 1 X X Drop NA packet and don't pass up the stack -# 0 0 X Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC -# 0 1 0 Pass NA packet up the stack, don't update NC -# 0 1 1 Pass NA packet up the stack, and add a STALE -# NC entry +# 1 X X Don't update NC +# 0 0 X Don't update NC +# 0 1 0 Don't update NC +# 0 1 1 Add a STALE NC entry ret=0 # Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4. @@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ setup() set -e local drop_unsolicited_na=$1 - local accept_unsolicited_na=$2 + local accept_untracked_na=$2 local forwarding=$3 # Setup two namespaces and a veth tunnel across them. @@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ setup() ${IP_ROUTER_EXEC} sysctl -qw \ ${ROUTER_CONF}.drop_unsolicited_na=${drop_unsolicited_na} ${IP_ROUTER_EXEC} sysctl -qw \ - ${ROUTER_CONF}.accept_unsolicited_na=${accept_unsolicited_na} + ${ROUTER_CONF}.accept_untracked_na=${accept_untracked_na} ${IP_ROUTER_EXEC} sysctl -qw ${ROUTER_CONF}.disable_ipv6=0 ${IP_ROUTER} addr add ${ROUTER_ADDR_WITH_MASK} dev ${ROUTER_INTF} @@ -144,13 +143,13 @@ link_up() { verify_ndisc() { local drop_unsolicited_na=$1 - local accept_unsolicited_na=$2 + local accept_untracked_na=$2 local forwarding=$3 neigh_show_output=$(${IP_ROUTER} neigh show \ to ${HOST_ADDR} dev ${ROUTER_INTF} nud stale) if [ ${drop_unsolicited_na} -eq 0 ] && \ - [ ${accept_unsolicited_na} -eq 1 ] && \ + [ ${accept_untracked_na} -eq 1 ] && \ [ ${forwarding} -eq 1 ]; then # Neighbour entry expected to be present for 011 case [[ ${neigh_show_output} ]] @@ -179,14 +178,14 @@ test_unsolicited_na_combination() { test_unsolicited_na_common $1 $2 $3 test_msg=("test_unsolicited_na: " "drop_unsolicited_na=$1 " - "accept_unsolicited_na=$2 " + "accept_untracked_na=$2 " "forwarding=$3") log_test $? 0 "${test_msg[*]}" cleanup } test_unsolicited_na_combinations() { - # Args: drop_unsolicited_na accept_unsolicited_na forwarding + # Args: drop_unsolicited_na accept_untracked_na forwarding # Expect entry test_unsolicited_na_combination 0 1 1 -- 2.27.0

2 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

kbuild problem: ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.o

by Randy Dunlap

Hi, In March I reported that a randconfig build complained: ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.o (https://lore.kernel.org/all/16509fb6-e40c-e31b-2c80-264c44b0beb9@infradead.…) I am still seeing this problem so I tried to dig into it a bit. However, I don't see why get_next_modinfo() and friends don't find the MODULE_LICENSE() since it is in the iio-rescale.o file. (BTW, I see this build error on many different $ARCH [around 15 tested] and with 2 different versions of GCC.) Q1: Is modpost checking both vmlinux and iio-rescale.o for modinfo license strings? It looks like it is, because it appears (?) that modpost is looking at drivers/iio/test/iio-test-rescale.o (<<<<< a kunit test, which is builtin in my .config) and at drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.o (which is built as a loadable module). Is this confusing modpost? I renamed drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c to afe-rescale.c and changed its Makefile entry accordingly and the MODULE_LICENSE error goes away. Is this a modpost error or is kunit messing things up? thanks for looking. -- ~Randy

2 years, 5 months

3
12
0 0

[PATCH seccomp] selftests/seccomp: Fix compile warning when CC=clang

by YiFei Zhu

clang has -Wconstant-conversion by default, and the constant 0xAAAAAAAAA (9 As) being converted to an int, which is generally 32 bits, results in the compile warning: clang -Wl,-no-as-needed -Wall -isystem ../../../../usr/include/ -lpthread seccomp_bpf.c -lcap -o seccomp_bpf seccomp_bpf.c:812:67: warning: implicit conversion from 'long' to 'int' changes value from 45812984490 to -1431655766 [-Wconstant-conversion] int kill = kill_how == KILL_PROCESS ? SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS : 0xAAAAAAAAA; ~~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. -1431655766 is the expected truncation, 0xAAAAAAAA (8 As), so use this directly in the code to avoid the warning. Fixes: 3932fcecd962 ("selftests/seccomp: Add test for unknown SECCOMP_RET kill behavior") Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei(a)google.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c index 136df5b76319..4ae6c8991307 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter_thread), .filter = filter_thread, }; - int kill = kill_how == KILL_PROCESS ? SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS : 0xAAAAAAAAA; + int kill = kill_how == KILL_PROCESS ? SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS : 0xAAAAAAAA; struct sock_filter filter_process[] = { BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), -- 2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog

2 years, 5 months

2
1
0 0

[PATCH v1] selftests/kselftest: Make failed tests exit with 1

by Mickaël Salaün

To check that tests are passing we must parse the kselftest runner output. It is much more convenient to check the return value of the runner instead: 0 is OK, and 1 implies one or more errors. This has an impact on the kselftest's gen_tar bundle and the run_tests make target. Backporting this change would be useful to consistently test older kernels as well. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark(a)amazon.de> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah(a)kernel.org> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 303f8e2d0200: selftests/kselftest/runner/run_one(): allow running non-executable files Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic(a)digikod.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527162417.2646998-1-mic@digikod.net --- tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh | 36 +++++++++++++-------- tools/testing/selftests/run_kselftest.sh | 4 ++- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh index 294619ade49f..f6488a53a78c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest/runner.sh @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ run_one() DIR="$1" TEST="$2" NUM="$3" + local rc=1 + local ret=1 BASENAME_TEST=$(basename $TEST) @@ -107,29 +109,36 @@ run_one() cmd="$interpreter ./$BASENAME_TEST" else echo "not ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG" - return + return 1 fi fi cd `dirname $TEST` > /dev/null - ((((( tap_timeout "$cmd" 2>&1; echo $? >&3) | + if (((( tap_timeout "$cmd" 2>&1; echo $? >&3) | tap_prefix >&4) 3>&1) | - (read xs; exit $xs)) 4>>"$logfile" && - echo "ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG") || - (rc=$?; \ - if [ $rc -eq $skip_rc ]; then \ - echo "ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG # SKIP" - elif [ $rc -eq $timeout_rc ]; then \ - echo "#" - echo "not ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG # TIMEOUT $kselftest_timeout seconds" + (read xs; exit $xs)) 4>>"$logfile"; then + echo "ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG" + ret=0 else - echo "not ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG # exit=$rc" - fi) + rc=$? + if [ $rc -eq $skip_rc ]; then + echo "ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG # SKIP" + ret=0 + elif [ $rc -eq $timeout_rc ]; then + echo "#" + echo "not ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG # TIMEOUT $kselftest_timeout seconds" + else + echo "not ok $test_num $TEST_HDR_MSG # exit=$rc" + fi + fi cd - >/dev/null fi + return $ret } run_many() { + local ret=0 + echo "TAP version 13" DIR="${PWD#${BASE_DIR}/}" test_num=0 @@ -142,6 +151,7 @@ run_many() logfile="/tmp/$BASENAME_TEST" cat /dev/null > "$logfile" fi - run_one "$DIR" "$TEST" "$test_num" + run_one "$DIR" "$TEST" "$test_num" || ret=1 done + return $ret } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/run_kselftest.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/run_kselftest.sh index 97165a83df63..6164314f837e 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/run_kselftest.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/run_kselftest.sh @@ -85,9 +85,11 @@ if [ -n "$TESTS" ]; then available="$(echo "$valid" | sed -e 's/ /\n/g')" fi +ret=0 collections=$(echo "$available" | cut -d: -f1 | uniq) for collection in $collections ; do [ -w /dev/kmsg ] && echo "kselftest: Running tests in $collection" >> /dev/kmsg tests=$(echo "$available" | grep "^$collection:" | cut -d: -f2) - ($dryrun cd "$collection" && $dryrun run_many $tests) + ($dryrun cd "$collection" && $dryrun run_many $tests) || ret=1 done +exit $ret base-commit: 7e284070abe53d448517b80493863595af4ab5f0 -- 2.36.0

2 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

Greetings From Ukraine.

by Kostiantyn Chichkov

Good Morning, We are Kostiantyn Chychkov and Maryna Chudnovska from Ukraine, we need your service, we have gone through your profile and we will like to work with you on an important service that needs urgent attention due to the ongoing war in our country. Kindly acknowledge this inquiry as soon as possible for a detailed discussion about the service. Thank you. Yours expectantly, Kostiantyn Chichkov & Ms. Maryna Chudnovska, From Ukraine.

2 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/3] fat: add support for the renameat2 RENAME_EXCHANGE flag

by Javier Martinez Canillas

Hello, This series add support for the renameat2 system call RENAME_EXCHANGE flag (which allows to atomically replace two paths) to the vfat filesystem code. There are many use cases for this, but we are particularly interested in making possible for vfat filesystems to be part of OSTree [0] deployments. Currently OSTree relies on symbolic links to make the deployment updates an atomic transactional operation. But RENAME_EXCHANGE could be used [1] to achieve a similar level of robustness when using a vfat filesystem. Patch #1 is just a preparatory patch to introduce the RENAME_EXCHANGE support in patch #2 and finally patch #3 adds some kselftests to test it. This is a v3 that addresses issues pointed out in the second version posted: https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/5/24/137 [0]: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree [1]: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1649 Changes in v3: - Add a .gitignore for the rename_exchange binary (Muhammad Usama Anjum). - Include $(KHDR_INCLUDES) instead of hardcoding a relative path in Makefile (Muhammad Usama Anjum). Changes in v2: - Only update the new_dir inode version and timestamps if != old_dir (Alex Larsson). - Add some helper functions to avoid duplicating code (OGAWA Hirofumi). - Use braces for multi-lines blocks even if are one statement (OGAWA Hirofumi). - Mention in commit message that the operation is as transactional as possible but within the vfat limitations of not having a journal (Colin Walters). - Call sync to flush the page cache before checking the file contents (Alex Larsson). - Drop RFC prefix since the patches already got some review. Javier Martinez Canillas (3): fat: add a vfat_rename2() and make existing .rename callback a helper fat: add renameat2 RENAME_EXCHANGE flag support selftests/filesystems: add a vfat RENAME_EXCHANGE test MAINTAINERS | 1 + fs/fat/namei_vfat.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + .../selftests/filesystems/fat/.gitignore | 2 + .../selftests/filesystems/fat/Makefile | 7 + .../testing/selftests/filesystems/fat/config | 2 + .../filesystems/fat/rename_exchange.c | 37 ++++ .../filesystems/fat/run_fat_tests.sh | 82 ++++++++ 8 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fat/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fat/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fat/config create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fat/rename_exchange.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/fat/run_fat_tests.sh -- 2.36.1

2 years, 5 months

2
2
0 0

[REGRESSION] lkft kselftest for next-20220525

by lkft＠linaro.org

## Build * kernel: 5.18.0 * git: ['', 'https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/next/linux-next'] * git branch: master * git commit: 8cb8311e95e3bb58bd84d6350365f14a718faa6d * git describe: next-20220525 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20220525 ## Test Regressions (compared to next-20220524) * qemu_arm, kselftest-pidfd - pidfd.pidfd_poll_test ## Metric Regressions (compared to next-20220524) No metric regressions found. Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> ## Test Fixes (compared to next-20220524) * qemu_arm, kselftest-seccomp - seccomp.seccomp_benchmark - seccomp.seccomp_bpf.TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl - seccomp.seccomp_bpf.TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence - seccomp.seccomp_bpf.TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence_no_tid_in_err ## Metric Fixes (compared to next-20220524) No metric fixes found. ## Test result summary total: 385, pass: 166, fail: 91, skip: 128, xfail: 0 ## Build Summary ## Test suites summary * kselftest-android * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-timens * kselftest-timers * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-vm -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org

2 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2] selftests/net: enable lo.accept_local in psock_snd test

by Yun Lu

From: luyun <luyun(a)kylinos.cn> The psock_snd test sends and recieves packets over loopback, and the test results depend on parameter settings: Set rp_filter=0, or set rp_filter=1 and accept_local=1 so that the test will pass. Otherwise, this test will fail with Resource temporarily unavailable: sudo ./psock_snd.sh dgram tx: 128 rx: 142 ./psock_snd: recv: Resource temporarily unavailable For most distro kernel releases(like Ubuntu or Centos), the parameter rp_filter is enabled by default, so it's necessary to enable the parameter lo.accept_local in psock_snd test. And this test runs inside a netns, changing a sysctl is fine. v2: add detailed description. Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: luyun <luyun(a)kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01(a)kylinos.cn> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_snd.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_snd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_snd.c index 7d15e10a9fb6..edf1e6f80d41 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_snd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/psock_snd.c @@ -389,6 +389,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) error(1, errno, "ip link set mtu"); if (system("ip addr add dev lo 172.17.0.1/24")) error(1, errno, "ip addr add"); + if (system("sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.lo.accept_local=1")) + error(1, errno, "sysctl lo.accept_local"); run_test(); -- 2.25.1 No virus found Checked by Hillstone Network AntiVirus

2 years, 5 months

4
3
0 0

Bitte kontaktaufnahme Erforderlich !!! Please Contact Required !!!

by Deterin Falcao

Guten Tag, Ich habe mich nur gefragt, ob Sie meine vorherige E-Mail bekommen haben ? Ich habe versucht, Sie per E-Mail zu erreichen. Kommen Sie bitte schnell zu mir zurück, es ist sehr wichtig. Danke Falcao Deterin falcaodeterin(a)gmail.com ---------------------------------- Good Afternoon, I was just wondering if you got my Previous E-mail have ? I tried to reach you by E-mail. Please come back to me quickly, it is very Important. Thanks Falcao Deterin falcaodeterin(a)gmail.com

2 years, 5 months

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror