- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH net-next v3 0/3] vsock: add support for sockmap

by Bobby Eshleman

Add support for sockmap to vsock. We're testing usage of vsock as a way to redirect guest-local UDS requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the performance of such a setup. Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by 121% in basic testing. Tested as follows. Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock redirector -> host vsock server Threads: 1 Payload: 64k No sockmap: - 76.3 MB/s - The guest vsock redirector was "socat VSOCK-CONNECT:2:1234 UNIX-RECV:/path/to/sock" Using sockmap (this patch): - 168.8 MB/s (+121%) - The guest redirector was a simple sockmap echo server, redirecting unix ingress to vsock 2:1234 egress. - Same sender and server programs *Note: these numbers are from RFC v1 Only the virtio transport has been tested. The loopback transport was used in writing bpf/selftests, but not thoroughly tested otherwise. This series requires the skb patch. Changes in v3: - vsock/bpf: Refactor wait logic in vsock_bpf_recvmsg() to avoid backwards goto - vsock/bpf: Check psock before acquiring slock - vsock/bpf: Return bool instead of int of 0 or 1 - vsock/bpf: Wrap macro args __sk/__psock in parens - vsock/bpf: Place comment trailer */ on separate line Changes in v2: - vsock/bpf: rename vsock_dgram_* -> vsock_* - vsock/bpf: change sk_psock_{get,put} and {lock,release}_sock() order to minimize slock hold time - vsock/bpf: use "new style" wait - vsock/bpf: fix bug in wait log - vsock/bpf: add check that recvmsg sk_type is one dgram, seqpacket, or stream. Return error if not one of the three. - virtio/vsock: comment __skb_recv_datagram() usage - virtio/vsock: do not init copied in read_skb() - vsock/bpf: add ifdef guard around struct proto in dgram_recvmsg() - selftests/bpf: add vsock loopback config for aarch64 - selftests/bpf: add vsock loopback config for s390x - selftests/bpf: remove vsock device from vmtest.sh qemu machine - selftests/bpf: remove CONFIG_VIRTIO_VSOCKETS=y from config.x86_64 - vsock/bpf: move transport-related (e.g., if (!vsk->transport)) checks out of fast path Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman(a)bytedance.com> --- Bobby Eshleman (3): vsock: support sockmap selftests/bpf: add vsock to vmtest.sh selftests/bpf: Add a test case for vsock sockmap drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 1 + include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/net/af_vsock.h | 17 ++ net/vmw_vsock/Makefile | 1 + net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 55 ++++++- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 2 + net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 24 +++ net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++ net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.aarch64 | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.s390x | 3 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.x86_64 | 3 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++ 13 files changed, 443 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- base-commit: d83115ce337a632f996e44c9f9e18cadfcf5a094 change-id: 20230118-support-vsock-sockmap-connectible-2e1297d2111a Best regards, -- Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman(a)bytedance.com> --- Bobby Eshleman (3): vsock: support sockmap selftests/bpf: add vsock to vmtest.sh selftests/bpf: add a test case for vsock sockmap drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 1 + include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/net/af_vsock.h | 17 ++ net/vmw_vsock/Makefile | 1 + net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 55 ++++++- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 2 + net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 25 +++ net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++ net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.aarch64 | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.s390x | 3 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.x86_64 | 3 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c | 163 +++++++++++++++++++ 13 files changed, 443 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- base-commit: c2ea552065e43d05bce240f53c3185fd3a066204 change-id: 20230227-vsock-sockmap-upstream-9d65c84174a2 Best regards, -- Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman(a)bytedance.com>

2 years, 3 months

4
10
0 0

Re: [PATCH 3/8] kunit: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs

by David Gow

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:25, Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org> wrote: > > Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:15:31) > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > Introduce KUnit resource wrappers around platform_driver_register(), > > > platform_device_alloc(), and platform_device_add() so that test authors > > > can register platform drivers/devices from their tests and have the > > > drivers/devices automatically be unregistered when the test is done. > > > > > > This makes test setup code simpler when a platform driver or platform > > > device is needed. Add a few test cases at the same time to make sure the > > > APIs work as intended. > > > > > > Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins(a)linux.dev> > > > Cc: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> > > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael(a)kernel.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org> > > > --- > > > > > > Should this be moved to drivers/base/ and called platform_kunit.c? > > > The include/kunit/platform_driver.h could also be > > > kunit/platform_device.h to match linux/platform_device.h if that is more > > > familiar. > > > > DRM has a similar thing already (albeit with a root_device, which is > > more common with KUnit tests generally): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/inc… > > > > But that's reasonably drm-specific, so it makes sense that it lives > > with DRM stuff. platform_device is a bit more generic. > > > > I'd probably personally err on the side of having these in > > drivers/base/, as I think we'll ultimately need similar things for a > > lot of different devices, and I'd rather not end up with things like > > USB device helpers living in the lib/kunit directory alongside the > > "core" KUnit code. But I could be persuaded otherwise. > > Ok no problem. I'll move it. > > > > > > > > > And I'm not super certain about allocating a driver structure and > > > embedding it in a wrapper struct. Maybe the code should just use > > > kunit_get_current_test() instead? > > > > I think there are enough cases througout the kernel where > > device/driver structs are needed that having this makes sense. > > Combined with the fact that, while kunit_get_current_test() can be > > used even when KUnit is not loaded, actually doing anything with the > > resulting struct kunit pointer will probably require (at least for the > > moment) KUnit functions to be reachable, so would break if > > CONFIG_KUNIT=m. > > Wouldn't it still work in that case? The unit tests would be modular as > well because they depend on CONFIG_KUNIT. > Yeah, the only case where this starts to get hairy is if the tests end up in the same module as the thing being tested (which sometimes happens to avoid having to export a bunch of symbols: see, e.g. thunderbolt and amdgpu), and then someone wants to build production kernels with CONFIG_KUNIT=m (alas, Red Hat and Android). So that's the only real place where you might need to avoid the non-'hook' KUnit functions, but those drivers are pretty few and far between, and most of the really useful functionality should be moving to 'hooks' which will be patched out cleanly at runtime. > > > > So, unless you actually find kunit_get_current_test() and friends to > > be easier to work with, I'd probably stick with this. > > > > Alright thanks. > > > > diff --git a/lib/kunit/platform_driver.c b/lib/kunit/platform_driver.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..11d155114936 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/lib/kunit/platform_driver.c > > > @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > +/* > > > + * Test managed platform driver > > > + */ > > > + > > > +#include <linux/device/driver.h> > > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > > > + > > > +#include <kunit/resource.h> > > > + > > > +struct kunit_platform_device_alloc_params { > > > + const char *name; > > > + int id; > > > +}; > > > > FYI: It's my plan to eventually get rid of (or at least de-emphasize) > > the whole 'init' function aspect of KUnit resources so we don't need > > all of these extra structs and the like. It probably won't make it in > > for 6.4, but we'll see... > > Will we be able to get the error values out of the init function? It's > annoying that the error values can't be returned as error pointers to > kunit_alloc_resource(). I end up skipping init, and doing it directly > before or after calling the kunit_alloc_resource() function. I'll try to > avoid init functions in the allocations. Yeah, that's largely why the plan is to get rid of them: it just made passing things around an enormous pain. Just doing your own initialisation before adding it as a resource is usually the right thing to do. There's also going to be a simpler kunit_defer() wrapper around it, which would just allow you to schedule a cleanup function to be called (without the need to keep kunit_resource pointers around, etc), for the cases where you don't need to look up resources elsewhere. But just doing your own thing and calling kunit_alloc_resource() is probably best for now, and should map well onto whatever this ends up evolving into. Cheers, -- David

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [PATCH 2/8] of: Enable DTB loading on UML for KUnit tests

by David Gow

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:19, Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org> wrote: > > Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:15:04) > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > To fully exercise common clk framework code in KUnit we need to > > > associate 'struct device' pointers with 'struct device_node' pointers so > > > that things like clk_get() can parse DT nodes for 'clocks' and so that > > > clk providers can use DT to provide clks; the most common mode of > > > operation for clk providers. > > > > > > Adding support to KUnit so that it loads a DTB is fairly simple after > > > commit b31297f04e86 ("um: Add devicetree support"). We can simply pass a > > > pre-compiled deviectree blob (DTB) on the kunit.py commandline and UML > > > will load it. The problem is that tests won't know that the commandline > > > has been modified, nor that a DTB has been loaded. Take a different > > > approach so that tests can skip if a DTB hasn't been loaded. > > > > > > Reuse the Makefile logic from the OF unittests to build a DTB into the > > > kernel. This DTB will be for the mythical machine "linux,kunit", i.e. > > > the devicetree for the KUnit "board". In practice, it is a dtsi file > > > that will gather includes for kunit tests that rely in part on a > > > devicetree being loaded. The devicetree should only be loaded if > > > CONFIG_OF_KUNIT=y. Make that a choice config parallel to the existing > > > CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST so that only one devicetree can be loaded in the > > > system at a time. Similarly, the kernel commandline option to load a > > > DTB is ignored if CONFIG_OF_KUNIT is enabled so that only one DTB is > > > loaded at a time. > > > > This feels a little bit like it's just papering over the real problem, > > which is that there's no way tests can skip themselves if no DTB is > > loaded. > > Hmm. I think you're suggesting that the unit test data be loaded > whenever CONFIG_OF=y and CONFIG_KUNIT=y. Then tests can check for > CONFIG_OF and skip if it isn't enabled? > More of the opposite: that we should have some way of supporting tests which might want to use a DTB other than the built-in one. Mostly for non-UML situations where an actual devicetree is needed to even boot far enough to get test output (so we wouldn't be able to override it with a compiled-in test one). I think moving to overlays probably will render this idea obsolete: but the thought was to give test code a way to check for the required devicetree nodes at runtime, and skip the test if they weren't found. That way, the failure mode for trying to boot this on something which required another device tree for, e.g., serial, would be "these tests are skipped because the wrong device tree is loaded", not "I get no output because serial isn't working". Again, though, it's only really needed for non-UML, and just loading overlays as needed should be much more sensible anyway. > > > > That being said, I do think that there's probably some sense in > > supporting the compiled-in DTB as well (it's definitely simpler than > > patching kunit.py to always pass the extra command-line option in, for > > example). > > But maybe it'd be nice to have the command-line option override the > > built-in one if present. > > Got it. I need to test loading another DTB on the commandline still, but > I think this won't be a problem. We'll load the unittest-data DTB even > with KUnit on UML, so assuming that works on UML right now it should be > unchanged by this series once I resend. Again, moving to overlays should render this mostly obsolete, no? Or am I misunderstanding how the overlay stuff will work? One possible future advantage of being able to test with custom DTs at boot time would be for fuzzing (provide random DT properties, see what happens in the test). We've got some vague plans to support a way of passing custom data to tests to support this kind of case (though, if we're using overlays, maybe the test could just patch those if we wanted to do that). Cheers, -- David

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding

by David Gow

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:12, Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org> wrote: > > Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:14:55) > > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded > > > into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code. > > > > As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit > > if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other > > architectures. > > > > That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real > > topic for bikeshedding is the name. > > - Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name? > > - Do we want to include the architecture in the name? > > Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc? > > I think I will drop this patch. I have overlays working. I hijacked > of_core_init() to load the testcase data from drivers/of/unittest-data > and made a container node for kunit overlays to apply to. Makes sense to me, thanks! Looking forward to seeing how the overlays work in practice!

2 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v4 0/4] mm: userfaultfd: refactor and add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP

by Axel Rasmussen

This series, currently based on 6.3-rc1, is divided into two parts: - Commits 1-3 refactor userfaultfd ioctl code without behavior changes, with the main goal of improving consistency and reducing the number of function args. - Commit 4 adds UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP. The refactors are sorted by increasing controversial-ness, the idea being we could drop some of the refactors if they are deemed not worth it. Changelog: v3->v4: - massage the uffd_flags_t implementation to eliminate all sparse warnings - add a couple inline helpers to make uffd_flags_t usage easier - drop the refactor passing `struct uffdio_range *` around (previously 4/5) - define a temporary `struct mm_struct *` in function with >=3 `vma->vm_mm` - consistent argument order between `flags` and `pagep` - expand on the use case in patch 4/4 message v2->v3: - rebase onto 6.3-rc1 - typedef a new type for mfill flags in patch 3/5 (suggested by Nadav) v1->v2: - refactor before adding the new flag, to avoid perpetuating messiness Axel Rasmussen (4): mm: userfaultfd: rename functions for clarity + consistency mm: userfaultfd: don't pass around both mm and vma mm: userfaultfd: combine 'mode' and 'wp_copy' arguments mm: userfaultfd: add UFFDIO_CONTINUE_MODE_WP to install WP PTEs fs/userfaultfd.c | 29 ++-- include/linux/hugetlb.h | 27 ++-- include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 9 +- include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 68 +++++---- include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h | 7 + mm/hugetlb.c | 28 ++-- mm/shmem.c | 14 +- mm/userfaultfd.c | 170 +++++++++++------------ tools/testing/selftests/mm/userfaultfd.c | 4 + 9 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-) -- 2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog

2 years, 3 months

3
11
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/3] mm: process/cgroup ksm support

by Stefan Roesch

So far KSM can only be enabled by calling madvise for memory regions. To be able to use KSM for more workloads, KSM needs to have the ability to be enabled / disabled at the process / cgroup level. Use case 1: The madvise call is not available in the programming language. An example for this are programs with forked workloads using a garbage collected language without pointers. In such a language madvise cannot be made available. In addition the addresses of objects get moved around as they are garbage collected. KSM sharing needs to be enabled "from the outside" for these type of workloads. Use case 2: The same interpreter can also be used for workloads where KSM brings no benefit or even has overhead. We'd like to be able to enable KSM on a workload by workload basis. Use case 3: With the madvise call sharing opportunities are only enabled for the current process: it is a workload-local decision. A considerable number of sharing opportuniites may exist across multiple workloads or jobs. Only a higler level entity like a job scheduler or container can know for certain if its running one or more instances of a job. That job scheduler however doesn't have the necessary internal worklaod knowledge to make targeted madvise calls. Security concerns: In previous discussions security concerns have been brought up. The problem is that an individual workload does not have the knowledge about what else is running on a machine. Therefore it has to be very conservative in what memory areas can be shared or not. However, if the system is dedicated to running multiple jobs within the same security domain, its the job scheduler that has the knowledge that sharing can be safely enabled and is even desirable. Performance: Experiments with using UKSM have shown a capacity increase of around 20%. 1. New options for prctl system command This patch series adds two new options to the prctl system call. The first one allows to enable KSM at the process level and the second one to query the setting. The setting will be inherited by child processes. With the above setting, KSM can be enabled for the seed process of a cgroup and all processes in the cgroup will inherit the setting. 2. Changes to KSM processing When KSM is enabled at the process level, the KSM code will iterate over all the VMA's and enable KSM for the eligible VMA's. When forking a process that has KSM enabled, the setting will be inherited by the new child process. In addition when KSM is disabled for a process, KSM will be disabled for the VMA's where KSM has been enabled. 3. Add general_profit metric The general_profit metric of KSM is specified in the documentation, but not calculated. This adds the general profit metric to /sys/kernel/debug/mm/ksm. 4. Add more metrics to ksm_stat This adds the process profit and ksm type metric to /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat. 5. Add more tests to ksm_tests This adds an option to specify the merge type to the ksm_tests. This allows to test madvise and prctl KSM. It also adds a new option to query if prctl KSM has been enabled. It adds a fork test to verify that the KSM process setting is inherited by client processes. Changes: - V3: - folded patch 1 - 6 - folded patch 7 - 14 - folded patch 15 - 19 - Expanded on the use cases in the cover letter - Added a section on security concerns to the cover letter - V2: - Added use cases to the cover letter - Removed the tracing patch from the patch series and posted it as an individual patch - Refreshed repo Stefan Roesch (3): mm: add new api to enable ksm per process mm: add new KSM process and sysfs knobs selftests/mm: add new selftests for KSM Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-ksm | 8 + Documentation/admin-guide/mm/ksm.rst | 8 +- fs/proc/base.c | 5 + include/linux/ksm.h | 19 +- include/linux/sched/coredump.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 2 + kernel/sys.c | 29 ++ mm/ksm.c | 114 +++++++- tools/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 3 +- tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_tests.c | 254 +++++++++++++++--- 11 files changed, 389 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-) base-commit: 234a68e24b120b98875a8b6e17a9dead277be16a -- 2.30.2

2 years, 3 months

5
15
0 0

[PATCH v4 1/3] kunit: fix bug in debugfs logs of parameterized tests

by Rae Moar

Fix bug in debugfs logs that causes individual parameterized results to not appear because the log is reinitialized (cleared) when each parameter is run. Ensure these results appear in the debugfs logs, increase log size to allow for the size of parameterized results. As a result, append lines to the log directly rather than using an intermediate variable that can cause stack size warnings due to the increased log size. Here is the debugfs log of ext4_inode_test which uses parameterized tests before the fix: KTAP version 1 # Subtest: ext4_inode_test 1..1 # Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16 ok 1 ext4_inode_test As you can see, this log does not include any of the individual parametrized results. After (in combination with the next two fixes to remove extra empty line and ensure KTAP valid format): KTAP version 1 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: ext4_inode_test 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding ok 1 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits ... (the rest of the individual parameterized tests) ok 16 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16 ok 1 inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding # Totals: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16 ok 1 ext4_inode_test Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> --- Changes from v3 -> v4: - No changes. Changes from v2 -> v3: - Fix a off-by-one bug in the kunit_log_append method. Changes from v1 -> v2: - Remove the use of the line variable in kunit_log_append that was causing stack size warnings. - Add before and after to the commit message. include/kunit/test.h | 2 +- lib/kunit/test.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 08d3559dd703..0668d29f3453 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kunit_running); struct kunit; /* Size of log associated with test. */ -#define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE 512 +#define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE 1500 /* Maximum size of parameter description string. */ #define KUNIT_PARAM_DESC_SIZE 128 diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index c9e15bb60058..c4d6304edd61 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -114,22 +114,27 @@ static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test, */ void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...) { - char line[KUNIT_LOG_SIZE]; va_list args; - int len_left; + int len, log_len, len_left; if (!log) return; - len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - strlen(log) - 1; + log_len = strlen(log); + len_left = KUNIT_LOG_SIZE - log_len - 1; if (len_left <= 0) return; + /* Evaluate length of line to add to log */ va_start(args, fmt); - vsnprintf(line, sizeof(line), fmt, args); + len = vsnprintf(NULL, 0, fmt, args) + 1; + va_end(args); + + /* Print formatted line to the log */ + va_start(args, fmt); + vsnprintf(log + log_len, min(len, len_left), fmt, args); va_end(args); - strncat(log, line, len_left); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_log_append); @@ -437,7 +442,6 @@ static void kunit_run_case_catch_errors(struct kunit_suite *suite, struct kunit_try_catch_context context; struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch; - kunit_init_test(test, test_case->name, test_case->log); try_catch = &test->try_catch; kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch, @@ -533,6 +537,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) struct kunit_result_stats param_stats = { 0 }; test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED; + kunit_init_test(&test, test_case->name, test_case->log); + if (!test_case->generate_params) { /* Non-parameterised test. */ kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); base-commit: 60684c2bd35064043360e6f716d1b7c20e967b7d -- 2.40.0.rc0.216.gc4246ad0f0-goog

2 years, 3 months

2
3
0 0

[PATCH 0/2] selftests: bump timeout for firmware and kmod

by Luis Chamberlain

Shuah, I'd like this to go through your tree as this is timeout related. In order to help me help developers run tests against the components I maintain much easily I have enabled selftests support on kdevops [0]. kdevops deals with abstractsions like letting you pick virtualization or cloud solutions to run the tests using kconfig, installs all dependencies for you, and with just a few make target commands can get you the latest linux-next tested against selftests. If other find this useful and would like support for their selftests on kdevops feel free to send patches. Eventually the idea is to be able to run as many selftests in parallel using different guests for each main selftest to speed up tests. Prior to this I used to run tests manually, now the selftests helpers are used (./tools/testing/selftests/run_kselftest.sh -s) and with this the default selftest timeout is hit. This just increases that for the few selftests I help maintain where obviously its not enough anymore. Note: on the firmware side I am spotting an OOM triggered by running tests in a loop, so far I hit in the android configuration but its not clear if the issue is just for that setup. [0] https://github.com/linux-kdevops/kdevops Luis Chamberlain (2): selftests/kmod: increase the kmod timeout from 45 to 165 selftests/firmware: increase timeout from 165 to 230 tools/testing/selftests/firmware/settings | 8 +++++++- tools/testing/selftests/kmod/settings | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kmod/settings -- 2.39.1

2 years, 3 months

2
8
0 0

[V2 PATCH 0/6] KVM: selftests: selftests for fd-based private memory

by Vishal Annapurve

This series implements selftests targeting the feature floated by Chao via: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221202061347.1070246-10-chao.p.peng@linux.in… Below changes aim to test the fd based approach for guest private memory in context of normal (non-confidential) VMs executing on non-confidential platforms. private_mem_test.c file adds selftest to access private memory from the guest via private/shared accesses and checking if the contents can be leaked to/accessed by vmm via shared memory view before/after conversions. Updates in V2: 1) Simplified vcpu run loop implementation API 2) Removed VM creation logic from private mem library Updates in V1 (Compared to RFC v3 patches): 1) Incorporated suggestions from Sean around simplifying KVM changes 2) Addressed comments from Sean 3) Added private mem test with shared memory backed by 2MB hugepages. V1 series: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221111014244.1714148-1-vannapurve@google.com… This series has dependency on following patches: 1) V10 series patches from Chao mentioned above. Github link for the patches posted as part of this series: https://github.com/vishals4gh/linux/commits/priv_memfd_selftests_v2 Vishal Annapurve (6): KVM: x86: Add support for testing private memory KVM: Selftests: Add support for private memory KVM: selftests: x86: Add IS_ALIGNED/IS_PAGE_ALIGNED helpers KVM: selftests: x86: Add helpers to execute VMs with private memory KVM: selftests: Add get_free_huge_2m_pages KVM: selftests: x86: Add selftest for private memory arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 + .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 15 +- .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h | 5 + .../kvm/include/x86_64/private_mem.h | 24 ++ .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 58 ++++- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c | 29 +++ .../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/private_mem.c | 139 ++++++++++++ .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_test.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++ virt/kvm/Kconfig | 4 + virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +- 13 files changed, 490 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/private_mem.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/private_mem.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/private_mem_test.c -- 2.39.0.rc0.267.gcb52ba06e7-goog

2 years, 3 months

5
26
0 0

[PATCH] bpf: Fix IMA test

by Roberto Sassu

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu(a)huawei.com> Commit 62622dab0a28 ("ima: return IMA digest value only when IMA_COLLECTED flag is set") caused bpf_ima_inode_hash() to refuse to give non-fresh digests. IMA test #3 assumed the old behavior, that bpf_ima_inode_hash() still returned also non-fresh digests. Correct the test by accepting both cases. If the samples returned are 1, assume that the commit above is applied and that the returned digest is fresh. If the samples returned are 2, assume that the commit above is not applied, and check both the non-fresh and fresh digest. Fixes: 62622dab0a28 ("ima: return IMA digest value only when IMA_COLLECTED flag is set") Reported by: David Vernet <void(a)manifault.com> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu(a)huawei.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c | 29 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c index b13feceb38f..810b14981c2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void test_test_ima(void) u64 bin_true_sample; char cmd[256]; - int err, duration = 0; + int err, duration = 0, fresh_digest_idx = 0; struct ima *skel = NULL; skel = ima__open_and_load(); @@ -129,7 +129,15 @@ void test_test_ima(void) /* * Test #3 * - Goal: confirm that bpf_ima_inode_hash() returns a non-fresh digest - * - Expected result: 2 samples (/bin/true: non-fresh, fresh) + * - Expected result: + * 1 sample (/bin/true: fresh) if commit 62622dab0a28 applied + * 2 samples (/bin/true: non-fresh, fresh) if commit 62622dab0a28 is + * not applied + * + * If commit 62622dab0a28 ("ima: return IMA digest value only when + * IMA_COLLECTED flag is set") is applied, bpf_ima_inode_hash() refuses + * to give a non-fresh digest, hence the correct result is 1 instead of + * 2. */ test_init(skel->bss); @@ -144,13 +152,18 @@ void test_test_ima(void) goto close_clean; err = ring_buffer__consume(ringbuf); - ASSERT_EQ(err, 2, "num_samples_or_err"); - ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[0], 0, "ima_hash"); - ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[1], 0, "ima_hash"); - ASSERT_EQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[0], bin_true_sample, "sample_equal_or_err"); + ASSERT_GE(err, 1, "num_samples_or_err"); + if (err == 2) { + ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[0], 0, "ima_hash"); + ASSERT_EQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[0], bin_true_sample, + "sample_equal_or_err"); + fresh_digest_idx = 1; + } + + ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[fresh_digest_idx], 0, "ima_hash"); /* IMA refreshed the digest. */ - ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[1], bin_true_sample, - "sample_different_or_err"); + ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf[fresh_digest_idx], bin_true_sample, + "sample_equal_or_err"); /* * Test #4 -- 2.25.1

2 years, 3 months

4
6
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror