- Linux-kselftest-mirror - lists.linaro.org

[PATCH v2] selftests/kvm: Avoid for loop initialization using vcpu->id in xapic_state_test

by Gautam Menghani

In the test_icr() function in xapic_state_test, one of the for loops is initialized with vcpu->id. Fix this assumption that vcpu->id is 0 so that IPIs are correctly sent to non-existent vCPUs [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/YyoZr9rXSSMEtdh5@google.com/ Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc(a)google.com> Signed-off-by: Gautam Menghani <gautammenghani201(a)gmail.com> --- changes in v2: 1. move the lore link above signed off tag tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c index 6f7a5ef66718..d7d37dae3eeb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/xapic_state_test.c @@ -114,7 +114,9 @@ static void test_icr(struct xapic_vcpu *x) * vCPUs, not vcpu.id + 1. Arbitrarily use vector 0xff. */ icr = APIC_INT_ASSERT | 0xff; - for (i = vcpu->id + 1; i < 0xff; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < 0xff; i++) { + if (i == vcpu->id) + continue; for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) __test_icr(x, i << (32 + 24) | icr | (j << 8)); } -- 2.34.1

3 years

1
0
0 0

kselftest: bonding: dev_addr_lists.sh doesn't run due to lack of dependencies

by Jonathan Toppins

When kselftest for bonding is built like: $ make TARGETS="drivers/net/bonding" -j8 -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar and then run on the target: $ ./run_kselftest.sh [...] # selftests: drivers/net/bonding: dev_addr_lists.sh # ./dev_addr_lists.sh: line 17: ./../../../net/forwarding/lib.sh: No such file or directory # ./dev_addr_lists.sh: line 107: tests_run: command not found # ./dev_addr_lists.sh: line 109: exit: : numeric argument required # ./dev_addr_lists.sh: line 34: pre_cleanup: command not found not ok 4 selftests: drivers/net/bonding: dev_addr_lists.sh # exit=2 [...] I am still new to kselftests is this expected or is there some way in the make machinery to force packaging of net as well? Thanks, -Jon

3 years

2
2
0 0

Hello, Good morning

by M Cheickna Toure

Hello, Good morning and how are you? I have an important and favourable information/proposal which might interest you to know, let me hear from you to detail you, it's important Sincerely, M.Cheickna tourecheickna(a)consultant.com

3 years

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v3] Documentation: Kunit: Update architecture.rst for minor fixes

by Sadiya Kazi

Updated the architecture.rst page with the following changes: -Add missing article _the_ across the document. -Reword content across for style and standard. -Update all occurrences of Command Line to Command-line across the document. -Correct grammatical issues, for example, added _it_wherever missing. -Update all occurrences of “via" to either use “through” or “using”. -Update the text preceding the external links and pushed the full link to a new line for better readability. -Reword content under the config command to make it more clear and concise. Signed-off-by: Sadiya Kazi <sadiyakazi(a)google.com> --- Thank you Bagas for your detailed comments. I think the current commit message does convey the right message as it is not a complete rewrite, hence retained it. Also since we talk about the two parts of the architecture, I have retained the it as 'kunit_tool (Command-line Test Harness)' instead of 'Running Tests Options'. Changes since v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20221013080545.1552573-1-sadiyakazi… -Updated the link descriptions as per Bagas’s feedback -Reworded content talking about options to run tests and added links as per Bagas’s feedback Best Regards, Sadiya Kazi --- .../dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst | 118 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst index 8efe792bdcb9..52b1a30c9f89 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst @@ -4,16 +4,17 @@ KUnit Architecture ================== -The KUnit architecture can be divided into two parts: +The KUnit architecture is divided into two parts: - `In-Kernel Testing Framework`_ -- `kunit_tool (Command Line Test Harness)`_ +- `kunit_tool (Command-line Test Harness)`_ In-Kernel Testing Framework =========================== The kernel testing library supports KUnit tests written in C using -KUnit. KUnit tests are kernel code. KUnit does several things: +KUnit. These KUnit tests are kernel code. KUnit performs the following +tasks: - Organizes tests - Reports test results @@ -22,19 +23,17 @@ KUnit. KUnit tests are kernel code. KUnit does several things: Test Cases ---------- -The fundamental unit in KUnit is the test case. The KUnit test cases are -grouped into KUnit suites. A KUnit test case is a function with type -signature ``void (*)(struct kunit *test)``. -These test case functions are wrapped in a struct called -struct kunit_case. +The test case is the fundamental unit in KUnit. KUnit test cases are organised +into suites. A KUnit test case is a function with type signature +``void (*)(struct kunit *test)``. These test case functions are wrapped in a +struct called struct kunit_case. .. note: ``generate_params`` is optional for non-parameterized tests. -Each KUnit test case gets a ``struct kunit`` context -object passed to it that tracks a running test. The KUnit assertion -macros and other KUnit utilities use the ``struct kunit`` context -object. As an exception, there are two fields: +Each KUnit test case receives a ``struct kunit`` context object that tracks a +running test. The KUnit assertion macros and other KUnit utilities use the +``struct kunit`` context object. As an exception, there are two fields: - ``->priv``: The setup functions can use it to store arbitrary test user data. @@ -75,14 +74,15 @@ with the KUnit test framework. Executor -------- -The KUnit executor can list and run built-in KUnit tests on boot. +The KUnit executor can list and run built-in KUnit tests on boot The Test suites are stored in a linker section -called ``.kunit_test_suites``. For code, see: -https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h?h=v5.15#n945. +called ``.kunit_test_suites``. For the code, see ``KUNIT_TABLE()`` macro +definition in +`include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/inc…>`_. The linker section consists of an array of pointers to ``struct kunit_suite``, and is populated by the ``kunit_test_suites()`` -macro. To run all tests compiled into the kernel, the KUnit executor -iterates over the linker section array. +macro. The KUnit executor iterates over the linker section array in order to +run all the tests that are compiled into the kernel. .. kernel-figure:: kunit_suitememorydiagram.svg :alt: KUnit Suite Memory @@ -90,17 +90,18 @@ iterates over the linker section array. KUnit Suite Memory Diagram On the kernel boot, the KUnit executor uses the start and end addresses -of this section to iterate over and run all tests. For code, see: -https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/executor.c - +of this section to iterate over and run all tests. For the implementation of the +executor, see +`lib/kunit/executor.c <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib…>`_. When built as a module, the ``kunit_test_suites()`` macro defines a ``module_init()`` function, which runs all the tests in the compilation unit instead of utilizing the executor. In KUnit tests, some error classes do not affect other tests or parts of the kernel, each KUnit case executes in a separate thread -context. For code, see: -https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/try-catch.c?h=v5.15#n58 +context. For the implememtation details, see ``kunit_try_catch_run()`` function +code in +`lib/kunit/try-catch.c <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib…>`_. Assertion Macros ---------------- @@ -111,37 +112,36 @@ All expectations/assertions are formatted as: - ``{EXPECT|ASSERT}`` determines whether the check is an assertion or an expectation. + In the event of a failure, the testing flow differs as follows: - - For an expectation, if the check fails, marks the test as failed - and logs the failure. + - For expectations, the test is marked as failed and the failure is logged. - - An assertion, on failure, causes the test case to terminate - immediately. + - Failing assertions, on the other hand, result in the test case being + terminated immediately. - - Assertions call function: + - Assertions call the function: ``void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *)``. - - ``kunit_abort`` calls function: + - ``kunit_abort`` calls the function: ``void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)``. - - ``kunit_try_catch_throw`` calls function: + - ``kunit_try_catch_throw`` calls the function: ``void kthread_complete_and_exit(struct completion *, long) __noreturn;`` and terminates the special thread context. - ``<op>`` denotes a check with options: ``TRUE`` (supplied property - has the boolean value “true”), ``EQ`` (two supplied properties are + has the boolean value "true"), ``EQ`` (two supplied properties are equal), ``NOT_ERR_OR_NULL`` (supplied pointer is not null and does not - contain an “err” value). + contain an "err" value). - ``[_MSG]`` prints a custom message on failure. Test Result Reporting --------------------- -KUnit prints test results in KTAP format. KTAP is based on TAP14, see: -https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io/blob/tap14/tap-version-14-specification.md. -KTAP (yet to be standardized format) works with KUnit and Kselftest. -The KUnit executor prints KTAP results to dmesg, and debugfs -(if configured). +KUnit prints the test results in KTAP format. KTAP is based on TAP14, see +Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst. +KTAP works with KUnit and Kselftest. The KUnit executor prints KTAP results to +dmesg, and debugfs (if configured). Parameterized Tests ------------------- @@ -150,33 +150,35 @@ Each KUnit parameterized test is associated with a collection of parameters. The test is invoked multiple times, once for each parameter value and the parameter is stored in the ``param_value`` field. The test case includes a KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a -generator function. -The generator function is passed the previous parameter and returns the next -parameter. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators based on -arrays. +generator function. The generator function is passed the previous parameter +and returns the next parameter. It also includes a macro for generating +array-based common-case generators. -kunit_tool (Command Line Test Harness) +kunit_tool (Command-line Test Harness) ====================================== -kunit_tool is a Python script ``(tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py)`` -that can be used to configure, build, exec, parse and run (runs other -commands in order) test results. You can either run KUnit tests using -kunit_tool or can include KUnit in kernel and parse manually. +``kunit_tool`` is a Python script, found in ``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``. It +is used to configure, build, execute, parse test results and run all of the +previous commands in correct order (i.e., configure, build, execute and parse). +You have two options for running KUnit tests: either build the kernel with KUnit +enabled and manually parse the results (see +Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst) or use ``kunit_tool`` +(see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst). - ``configure`` command generates the kernel ``.config`` from a ``.kunitconfig`` file (and any architecture-specific options). - For some architectures, additional config options are specified in the - ``qemu_config`` Python script - (For example: ``tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/powerpc.py``). + The Python scripts available in ``qemu_configs`` folder + (for example, ``tools/testing/kunit/qemu configs/powerpc.py``) contains + additional configuration options for specific architectures. It parses both the existing ``.config`` and the ``.kunitconfig`` files - and ensures that ``.config`` is a superset of ``.kunitconfig``. - If this is not the case, it will combine the two and run - ``make olddefconfig`` to regenerate the ``.config`` file. It then - verifies that ``.config`` is now a superset. This checks if all - Kconfig dependencies are correctly specified in ``.kunitconfig``. - ``kunit_config.py`` includes the parsing Kconfigs code. The code which - runs ``make olddefconfig`` is a part of ``kunit_kernel.py``. You can - invoke this command via: ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config`` and + to ensure that ``.config`` is a superset of ``.kunitconfig``. + If not, it will combine the two and run ``make olddefconfig`` to regenerate + the ``.config`` file. It then checks to see if ``.config`` has become a superset. + This verifies that all the Kconfig dependencies are correctly specified in the + file ``.kunitconfig``. The ``kunit_config.py`` script contains the code for parsing + Kconfigs. The code which runs ``make olddefconfig`` is part of the + ``kunit_kernel.py`` script. You can invoke this command through: + ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config`` and generate a ``.config`` file. - ``build`` runs ``make`` on the kernel tree with required options (depends on the architecture and some options, for example: build_dir) @@ -184,8 +186,8 @@ kunit_tool or can include KUnit in kernel and parse manually. To build a KUnit kernel from the current ``.config``, you can use the ``build`` argument: ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build``. - ``exec`` command executes kernel results either directly (using - User-mode Linux configuration), or via an emulator such - as QEMU. It reads results from the log via standard + User-mode Linux configuration), or through an emulator such + as QEMU. It reads results from the log using standard output (stdout), and passes them to ``parse`` to be parsed. If you already have built a kernel with built-in KUnit tests, you can run the kernel and display the test results with the ``exec`` -- 2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog

3 years

2
1
0 0

Zwiększenie płynności finansowej

by Jakub Olejniczak

Dzień dobry, kontaktuję się z Państwem, ponieważ chciałbym zaproponować wygodne rozwiązanie, które umożliwi Państwa firmie stabilny rozwój. Konkurencyjne otoczenie wymaga ciągłego ulepszania i poszerzenia oferty, co z kolei wiąże się z koniecznością inwestowania. Brak odpowiedniego kapitału poważnie ogranicza tempo rozwoju firmy. Od wielu lat z powodzeniem pomagam firmom w uzyskaniu najlepszej formy finansowania z banku oraz UE. Mam stałych Klientów, którzy nadal chętnie korzystają z moich usług, a także polecają je innym. Czy chcieliby Państwo skorzystać z pomocy wykwalifikowanego i doświadczonego doradcy finansowego? Pozdrawiam Jakub Olejniczak

3 years

1
0
0 0

[PATCH 1/2] tools: Add LoongArch build infrastructure

by Huacai Chen

We will add tools support for LoongArch (bpf, perf, objtool, etc.), add build infrastructure and common headers for preparation. Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai(a)loongson.cn> --- tools/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 9 +++++++++ tools/scripts/Makefile.arch | 11 ++++++++++- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h diff --git a/tools/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h b/tools/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d4e32b3d4843 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */ +#ifndef __ASM_LOONGARCH_BITSPERLONG_H +#define __ASM_LOONGARCH_BITSPERLONG_H + +#define __BITS_PER_LONG (__SIZEOF_POINTER__ * 8) + +#include <asm-generic/bitsperlong.h> + +#endif /* __ASM_LOONGARCH_BITSPERLONG_H */ diff --git a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch index 0c6c7f456887..1c72d07cb9fe 100644 --- a/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch +++ b/tools/scripts/Makefile.arch @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ HOSTARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/x86/ -e s/x86_64/x86/ \ -e s/s390x/s390/ -e s/parisc64/parisc/ \ -e s/ppc.*/powerpc/ -e s/mips.*/mips/ \ -e s/sh[234].*/sh/ -e s/aarch64.*/arm64/ \ - -e s/riscv.*/riscv/) + -e s/riscv.*/riscv/ -e s/loongarch.*/loongarch/) ifndef ARCH ARCH := $(HOSTARCH) @@ -34,6 +34,15 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),sh64) SRCARCH := sh endif +# Additional ARCH settings for loongarch +ifeq ($(ARCH),loongarch32) + SRCARCH := loongarch +endif + +ifeq ($(ARCH),loongarch64) + SRCARCH := loongarch +endif + LP64 := $(shell echo __LP64__ | ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -E -x c - | tail -n 1) ifeq ($(LP64), 1) IS_64_BIT := 1 -- 2.31.1

3 years

2
3
0 0

[PATCH] kunit: log numbers in decimal and hex

by Mark Rutland

When KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() or KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() log a failure, they log the two values being compared, with numerical values logged in decimal. In some cases, decimal output is painful to consume, and hexadecimal output would be more helpful. For example, this is the case for tests I'm currently developing for the arm64 insn encoding/decoding code, where comparing two 32-bit instruction opcodes results in output such as: | # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791 | Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but | obj_insn == 2332164128 | gen_insn == 1258422304 To make this easier to consume, this patch logs the values in both decimal and hexadecimal: | # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791 | Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but | obj_insn == 2332164128 (0x8b020020) | gen_insn == 1258422304 (0x4b020020) As can be seen from the example, having hexadecimal makes it significantly easier for a human to spot which specific bits are incorrect. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland(a)arm.com> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins(a)linux.dev> Cc: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Cc: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: kunit-dev(a)googlegroups.com --- lib/kunit/assert.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c index d00d6d181ee8..24dec5b48722 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/assert.c +++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c @@ -127,13 +127,15 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, binary_assert->text->right_text); if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->left_text, binary_assert->left_value, stream->gfp)) - string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld\n", + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld (0x%llx)\n", binary_assert->text->left_text, + binary_assert->left_value, binary_assert->left_value); if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->right_text, binary_assert->right_value, stream->gfp)) - string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld", + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld (0x%llx)", binary_assert->text->right_text, + binary_assert->right_value, binary_assert->right_value); kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); } -- 2.30.2

3 years

3
2
0 0

[PATCH] kunit: update NULL vs IS_ERR() tests

by Dan Carpenter

The alloc_string_stream() functions were changed from returning NULL on error to returning error pointers so these caller needs to be updated as well. Fixes: 78b1c6584fce ("kunit: string-stream: Simplify resource use") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter(a)oracle.com> --- lib/kunit/string-stream.c | 4 ++-- lib/kunit/test.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/string-stream.c b/lib/kunit/string-stream.c index f5ae79c37400..a608746020a9 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/string-stream.c +++ b/lib/kunit/string-stream.c @@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ int string_stream_vadd(struct string_stream *stream, frag_container = alloc_string_stream_fragment(stream->test, len, stream->gfp); - if (!frag_container) - return -ENOMEM; + if (IS_ERR(frag_container)) + return PTR_ERR(frag_container); len = vsnprintf(frag_container->fragment, len, fmt, args); spin_lock(&stream->lock); diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 90640a43cf62..2a6992fe7c3e 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void kunit_fail(struct kunit *test, const struct kunit_loc *loc, kunit_set_failure(test); stream = alloc_string_stream(test, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!stream) { + if (IS_ERR(stream)) { WARN(true, "Could not allocate stream to print failed assertion in %s:%d\n", loc->file, -- 2.35.1

3 years

3
2
0 0

[RESEND PATCH] selftests/futex: fix build for clang

by Ricardo Cañuelo

Don't use the test-specific header files as source files to force a target dependency, as clang will complain if more than one source file is used for a compile command with a single '-o' flag. Use the proper Makefile variables instead as defined in tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk. Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile index 732149011692..5a0e0df8de9b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ INCLUDES := -I../include -I../../ -I../../../../../usr/include/ CFLAGS := $(CFLAGS) -g -O2 -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -pthread $(INCLUDES) $(KHDR_INCLUDES) LDLIBS := -lpthread -lrt -HEADERS := \ +LOCAL_HDRS := \ ../include/futextest.h \ ../include/atomic.h \ ../include/logging.h -TEST_GEN_FILES := \ +TEST_GEN_PROGS := \ futex_wait_timeout \ futex_wait_wouldblock \ futex_requeue_pi \ @@ -24,5 +24,3 @@ TEST_PROGS := run.sh top_srcdir = ../../../../.. DEFAULT_INSTALL_HDR_PATH := 1 include ../../lib.mk - -$(TEST_GEN_FILES): $(HEADERS) -- 2.25.1

3 years

3
2
0 0

hmm_test issues with latest mainline

by Vlastimil Babka

Hi, I've been trying the hmm_tests as of today's commit: a185a0995518 ("Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.1-rc1-2' ...) and run into several issues that seemed worth reporting. First, it seems the FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(hmm) in tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c using ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); can run into an infinite loop of reporting the assertion failure. Dunno if it's a kselftests issue or it's a bug to use asserts in teardown. I hacked it up like this locally to proceed: --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c @@ -154,6 +154,11 @@ FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(hmm) { int ret = close(self->fd); + if (ret != 0) { + fprintf(stderr, "close returned (%d) fd is (%d)\n", ret,self->fd); + exit(1); + } + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); self->fd = -1; } Next, there are some tests that fail (and thus also trigger the issue above) # RUN hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive ... # hmm-tests.c:1702:exclusive:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0) close returned (-1) fd is (3) # exclusive: Test failed at step #1 # FAIL hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive not ok 20 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive # RUN hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect ... # hmm-tests.c:1756:exclusive_mprotect:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0) close returned (-1) fd is (3) # exclusive_mprotect: Test failed at step #1 # FAIL hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect not ok 21 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_mprotect # RUN hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow ... # hmm-tests.c:1809:exclusive_cow:Expected ret (-16) == 0 (0) close returned (-1) fd is (3) # exclusive_cow: Test failed at step #1 # FAIL hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow not ok 22 hmm.hmm_device_private.exclusive_cow I'll try to check more closely but maybe if you can reproduce it too, you'll have more idea what's going on. The next thing is more of a question/documentation suggestion. Tons of tests fail like this: ok 24 hmm.hmm_device_private.hmm_cow_in_device # RUN hmm.hmm_device_coherent.open_close ... could not open hmm dmirror driver (/dev/hmm_dmirror2) # SKIP DEVICE_COHERENT not available # OK hmm.hmm_device_coherent.open_close I assume this is because I run "test_hmm.sh smoke" without the SPM parameters. The help message doesn't say much about what to specify there for <spm_addr_dev0> <spm_addr_dev1>. Do these tests need a particular hardware? (unlike the rest?) Maybe it could be clarified. Last thing, I noticed all these DEVICE_COHERENT tests ultimately count as OK, not SKIPPED, which would probably be more appropriate? # FAILED: 51 / 54 tests passed. # Totals: pass:50 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:1 error:0 (the skip:1 is due to test 9 "# SKIP Huge page could not be allocated" which is probably a misconfiguration on my part so I don't report that as an issue) Thanks, Vlastimil

3 years

6
17
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror