On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:16:10PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:42:17AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Doesn't bother me, I could do it in a patch ontop. But your call.
No objection here.
Something like this:
From: Borislav Petkov firstname.lastname@example.org
... so that "offsetting" is spelled the same as the respective VMX feature bit VMX_FEATURE_TSC_OFFSETTING.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov email@example.com
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Sean Christopherson firstname.lastname@example.org
Yah, so I tried to do a test-merge with linux-next to see what surprises should I be prepared for and there's the first one:
5e3d394fdd9e ("KVM: VMX: Fix the spelling of CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETTING")
which is already in Paolo's tree. Dropping it on my side.
Doh, now that you point it out, I remember that patch going by. Sorry I didn't recall it earlier.
Thanks for your help!