bitmap_list_string() is very ineffective when printing bitmaps with long ranges of set bits because it calls find_next_bit for each bit in the bitmap. We can do better by detecting ranges of set bits.
In my environment, before/after is 943008/31008 ns.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov yury.norov@gmail.com Tested-by: Wolfram Sang wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com --- lib/vsprintf.c | 24 +++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c index dd006adfe853..29a384eee286 100644 --- a/lib/vsprintf.c +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c @@ -1241,20 +1241,13 @@ char *bitmap_list_string(char *buf, char *end, unsigned long *bitmap, struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt) { int nr_bits = max_t(int, spec.field_width, 0); - /* current bit is 'cur', most recently seen range is [rbot, rtop] */ - int cur, rbot, rtop; bool first = true; + int rbot, rtop;
if (check_pointer(&buf, end, bitmap, spec)) return buf;
- rbot = cur = find_first_bit(bitmap, nr_bits); - while (cur < nr_bits) { - rtop = cur; - cur = find_next_bit(bitmap, nr_bits, cur + 1); - if (cur < nr_bits && cur <= rtop + 1) - continue; - + for_each_set_bitrange(rbot, rtop, bitmap, nr_bits) { if (!first) { if (buf < end) *buf = ','; @@ -1263,15 +1256,12 @@ char *bitmap_list_string(char *buf, char *end, unsigned long *bitmap, first = false;
buf = number(buf, end, rbot, default_dec_spec); - if (rbot < rtop) { - if (buf < end) - *buf = '-'; - buf++; - - buf = number(buf, end, rtop, default_dec_spec); - } + if (rtop == rbot + 1) + continue;
- rbot = cur; + if (buf < end) + *buf = '-'; + buf = number(++buf, end, rtop - 1, default_dec_spec); } return buf; }