On 10/1/22 04:07, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch scgl@linux.ibm.com
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c index 3a160ab0415b..1887685b41d2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static void test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled(void) /* * vcpu, mismatching keys on fetch,
* fetch protection override does not apply because memory range acceeded
*/ CHECK_N_DO(ERR_PROT_MOP, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, READ, mem2, 2048 + 1, GADDR_V(0), KEY(2)); CHECK_N_DO(ERR_PROT_MOP, t.vcpu, LOGICAL, READ, mem2, PAGE_SIZE + 2048 + 1,* fetch protection override does not apply because memory range exceeded
No patch description? Seriously?
What about this one?:
``` The word "acceded" isn't the right word to describe too much memory situation. Substitute it with "exceeded". ```
Thanks.