On 26.09.22 15:03, Zhao Gongyi wrote:
Add checking for online_memory_expect_success()/ offline_memory_expect_success()/offline_memory_expect_fail(), or the test would exit 0 although the functions return 1.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Gongyi zhaogongyi@huawei.com
.../selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh index 46a97f318f58..3edda1f13f7b 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/mem-on-off-test.sh @@ -266,7 +266,10 @@ done # echo $error > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_ONLINE/error for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do
- online_memory_expect_fail $memory
- online_memory_expect_fail $memory || {
echo "online memory $memory: unexpected success"
The functions themself already print an error, isn't it sufficient to set retval=1?
retval=1} done
#
@@ -274,7 +277,10 @@ done # echo 0 > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_ONLINE/error for memory in `hotpluggable_offline_memory`; do
- online_memory_expect_success $memory
online_memory_expect_success $memory || {
echo "online memory $memory: unexpected fail"retval=1} done
#
@@ -283,7 +289,10 @@ done echo $error > $NOTIFIER_ERR_INJECT_DIR/actions/MEM_GOING_OFFLINE/error for memory in `hotpluggable_online_memory`; do if [ $((RANDOM % 100)) -lt $ratio ]; then
offline_memory_expect_fail $memory
offline_memory_expect_fail $memory || {echo "offline memory $memory: unexpected success"retval=1}
These functions return 0 if the result is as expected and 1 if the result is unexpected.
... but wouldn't we evaluate the right hand side only if the result is "0" -- expected? I might be wrong.
Wouldn't it be simpler do it as in "Online all hot-pluggable memory again"
if ! online_memory_expect_success $memory; then retval=1 fi
(similarly adjusting the function name)