+Joe Fradley who is also looking at KUnit with Android.
On 4/15/22 14:43, Steve Muckle wrote:
On 4/4/22 13:13, Brendan Higgins wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:22 AM Steven Rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:13:12 +0800 David Gow davidgow@google.com wrote:
Does either (or both) of these features sound useful, and is this sort-of API the right model? (Personally, I think there's a reasonable scope for both.) Is anything obviously missing or wrong? Do the names, descriptions etc. make any sense?
Obviously I'm biased toward the ftrace solution ;-)
Personally, I like providing both - as long as we can keep the interface the same.
Ftrace is less visually invasive, but it is also less flexible in capabilities, and requires substantial work to support on new architectures.
The general feature looks useful to me. I'm not sure the ftrace based API is worth it given it is only offering a visual improvement and has some drawbacks compared to the other implementation (won't work with inline functions, dependencies on other features). Livepatch is absent on arm64 which mostly rules it out for my purposes (Android Generic Kernel Image testing).
cheers, Steve