Hi Mathieu,
On 06/03/2019 22:57, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
When operating in CPU-wide trace scenarios and working with an N:1 source/sink HW topology, update() functions need to be made atomic in order to avoid racing with start and stop operations.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
nit: Same as the previous patch, the subject is a bit misleading. We are infact fixing/cleaning/preparing the function.
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com