On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:39:13 +0000, Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com wrote:
On 23/03/2021 18:21, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Hi Suzuki?
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:06:33PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
tsb csync synchronizes the trace operation of instructions. The instruction is a nop when FEAT_TRF is not implemented.
Cc: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: Mike Leach mike.leach@linaro.org Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com
How do you plan to merge these patches? If they go via the coresight tree:
Ideally all of this should go via the CoreSight tree to have the dependencies solved at one place. But there are some issues :
If this makes to 5.13 queue for CoreSight,
- CoreSight next is based on rc2 at the moment and we have fixes gone
into rc3 and later, which this series will depend on. (We could move the next tree forward to a later rc to solve this).
- There could be conflicts with the kvmarm tree for the KVM host
changes (That has dependency on the TRBE definitions patch).
If it doesn't make to 5.13 queue, it would be good to have this patch, the TRBE defintions and the KVM host patches queued for 5.13 (not sure if this is acceptable) and we could rebase the CoreSight changes on 5.13 and push it to next release.
I am open for other suggestions.
Marc, Mathieu,
Thoughts ?
I was planning to take the first two patches in 5.12 as fixes (they are queued already, and would hopefully land in -rc5). If that doesn't fit with the plan, please let me know ASAP.
Thanks,
M.