On 2020-07-28 13:59, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2020-07-28 00:51:02)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c index 6d7d2169bfb2..adb71987a1e3 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c @@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ module_param(pm_save_enable, int, 0444); MODULE_PARM_DESC(pm_save_enable, "Save/restore state on power down: 1 = never, 2 = self-hosted");
-/* The number of ETMv4 currently registered */ -static int etm4_count; static struct etmv4_drvdata *etmdrvdata[NR_CPUS]; static void etm4_set_default_config(struct etmv4_config *config); static int etm4_set_event_filters(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata, @@ -1403,12 +1401,9 @@ static int etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked(void)
Is this only called from __init now? If so please mark it as __init then.
Yes, will change it.
{ int ret;
if (etm4_count++)
return 0;
ret = cpu_pm_register_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb); if (ret)
goto reduce_count;
return ret; ret =
cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls_cpuslocked(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING, "arm/coresight4:starting", @@ -1432,17 +1427,11 @@ static int etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked(void)
unregister_notifier: cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb);
-reduce_count:
--etm4_count; return ret;
}
static void etm4_pm_clear(void)
This is __init too?
Will change.
{
if (--etm4_count != 0)
return;
cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&etm4_cpu_pm_nb); cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING); if (hp_online) {
@@ -1598,4 +1576,29 @@ static struct amba_driver etm4x_driver = { .probe = etm4_probe, .id_table = etm4_ids, }; -builtin_amba_driver(etm4x_driver);
+static int __init etm4x_init(void) +{
int ret;
cpus_read_lock();
ret = etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked();
cpus_read_unlock();
/* etm4_pm_setup_cpuslocked() does its own cleanup - exit on
error */
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = amba_driver_register(&etm4x_driver);
if (ret) {
pr_info("Error registering etm4x driver\n");
Use pr_err() please.
Yes indeed, will change.
goto err_init;
}
return ret;
+err_init:
Why is this a goto?
etm4_pm_clear();
return ret;
Instead of just putting this in the if (ret) arm?
Will change.
+} +module_init(etm4x_init);
It was device_initcall before with builtin_amba_driver(), best to not change that.
Sure.
I will wait to see if there are any more comments on this patch and then post a v3. Thanks for the review Stephen.
Thanks, Sai