Hi Peter, or any x86 maintainer,
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 07:14:02PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
Since BTS is coherent, simply add a compiler barrier to separate the BTS update and aux_head store.
Could you reivew this patch and check if BTS needs the comipler barrier in this case? Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org
arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c index 6320d2cfd9d3..974e917e65b2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c @@ -209,6 +209,12 @@ static void bts_update(struct bts_ctx *bts) } else { local_set(&buf->data_size, head); }
- /*
* Since BTS is coherent, just add compiler barrier to ensure
* BTS updating is ordered against bts::handle::event.
*/
- barrier();
} static int -- 2.25.1