Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
+ Olof,
Hello Kevin,
Hi,
On 11/19/2014 06:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
I'm not sure what is the correct step in this case but I'm OK with reverting the patch until the Exynos DRM driver bug is fixed.
I didn't have time to dig, but I'd rather someone track down the DRM problem and fix that, since it was known to be working. I'm guessing it's something simple that can be fixed before the merge window opens.
OK, so this DRM problem is turning out to be non-trivial, so I think the defconfig patch should be reverted until the DRM issue is sorted out.
Otherwise, we risk having boot failures in linux-next which may be hiding other problems.
Kevin
Agreed with the config revert, so many issues with Exynos DRM in
linux-next :(
Yeah, it could be a best solution at this moment. Let me revert the commit 0ef76aea7a34 ("ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable options for display panel support") from -next in samsung tree.
Thanks, Kukjin