Linaro-mm-sig July 2020

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

19 participants
35 discussions

[PATCH 01/25] dma-fence: basic lockdep annotations

by Daniel Vetter

Design is similar to the lockdep annotations for workers, but with some twists: - We use a read-lock for the execution/worker/completion side, so that this explicit annotation can be more liberally sprinkled around. With read locks lockdep isn't going to complain if the read-side isn't nested the same way under all circumstances, so ABBA deadlocks are ok. Which they are, since this is an annotation only. - We're using non-recursive lockdep read lock mode, since in recursive read lock mode lockdep does not catch read side hazards. And we _very_ much want read side hazards to be caught. For full details of this limitation see commit e91498589746065e3ae95d9a00b068e525eec34f Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> Date: Wed Aug 23 13:13:11 2017 +0200 locking/lockdep/selftests: Add mixed read-write ABBA tests - To allow nesting of the read-side explicit annotations we explicitly keep track of the nesting. lock_is_held() allows us to do that. - The wait-side annotation is a write lock, and entirely done within dma_fence_wait() for everyone by default. - To be able to freely annotate helper functions I want to make it ok to call dma_fence_begin/end_signalling from soft/hardirq context. First attempt was using the hardirq locking context for the write side in lockdep, but this forces all normal spinlocks nested within dma_fence_begin/end_signalling to be spinlocks. That bollocks. The approach now is to simple check in_atomic(), and for these cases entirely rely on the might_sleep() check in dma_fence_wait(). That will catch any wrong nesting against spinlocks from soft/hardirq contexts. The idea here is that every code path that's critical for eventually signalling a dma_fence should be annotated with dma_fence_begin/end_signalling. The annotation ideally starts right after a dma_fence is published (added to a dma_resv, exposed as a sync_file fd, attached to a drm_syncobj fd, or anything else that makes the dma_fence visible to other kernel threads), up to and including the dma_fence_wait(). Examples are irq handlers, the scheduler rt threads, the tail of execbuf (after the corresponding fences are visible), any workers that end up signalling dma_fences and really anything else. Not annotated should be code paths that only complete fences opportunistically as the gpu progresses, like e.g. shrinker/eviction code. The main class of deadlocks this is supposed to catch are: Thread A: mutex_lock(A); mutex_unlock(A); dma_fence_signal(); Thread B: mutex_lock(A); dma_fence_wait(); mutex_unlock(A); Thread B is blocked on A signalling the fence, but A never gets around to that because it cannot acquire the lock A. Note that dma_fence_wait() is allowed to be nested within dma_fence_begin/end_signalling sections. To allow this to happen the read lock needs to be upgraded to a write lock, which means that any other lock is acquired between the dma_fence_begin_signalling() call and the call to dma_fence_wait(), and still held, this will result in an immediate lockdep complaint. The only other option would be to not annotate such calls, defeating the point. Therefore these annotations cannot be sprinkled over the code entirely mindless to avoid false positives. Originally I hope that the cross-release lockdep extensions would alleviate the need for explicit annotations: https://lwn.net/Articles/709849/ But there's a few reasons why that's not an option: - It's not happening in upstream, since it got reverted due to too many false positives: commit e966eaeeb623f09975ef362c2866fae6f86844f9 Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)kernel.org> Date: Tue Dec 12 12:31:16 2017 +0100 locking/lockdep: Remove the cross-release locking checks This code (CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y and CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS=y), while it found a number of old bugs initially, was also causing too many false positives that caused people to disable lockdep - which is arguably a worse overall outcome. - cross-release uses the complete() call to annotate the end of critical sections, for dma_fence that would be dma_fence_signal(). But we do not want all dma_fence_signal() calls to be treated as critical, since many are opportunistic cleanup of gpu requests. If these get stuck there's still the main completion interrupt and workers who can unblock everyone. Automatically annotating all dma_fence_signal() calls would hence cause false positives. - cross-release had some educated guesses for when a critical section starts, like fresh syscall or fresh work callback. This would again cause false positives without explicit annotations, since for dma_fence the critical sections only starts when we publish a fence. - Furthermore there can be cases where a thread never does a dma_fence_signal, but is still critical for reaching completion of fences. One example would be a scheduler kthread which picks up jobs and pushes them into hardware, where the interrupt handler or another completion thread calls dma_fence_signal(). But if the scheduler thread hangs, then all the fences hang, hence we need to manually annotate it. cross-release aimed to solve this by chaining cross-release dependencies, but the dependency from scheduler thread to the completion interrupt handler goes through hw where cross-release code can't observe it. In short, without manual annotations and careful review of the start and end of critical sections, cross-relese dependency tracking doesn't work. We need explicit annotations. v2: handle soft/hardirq ctx better against write side and dont forget EXPORT_SYMBOL, drivers can't use this otherwise. v3: Kerneldoc. v4: Some spelling fixes from Mika v5: Amend commit message to explain in detail why cross-release isn't the solution. v6: Pull out misplaced .rst hunk. Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling(a)amd.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala(a)intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom(a)intel.com> Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> --- Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 6 + drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/dma-fence.h | 12 ++ 3 files changed, 179 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst index 7fb7b661febd..05d856131140 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst @@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ DMA Fences .. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c :doc: DMA fences overview +DMA Fence Signalling Annotations +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c + :doc: fence signalling annotation + DMA Fences Functions Reference ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c index 656e9ac2d028..0005bc002529 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -110,6 +110,160 @@ u64 dma_fence_context_alloc(unsigned num) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_context_alloc); +/** + * DOC: fence signalling annotation + * + * Proving correctness of all the kernel code around &dma_fence through code + * review and testing is tricky for a few reasons: + * + * * It is a cross-driver contract, and therefore all drivers must follow the + * same rules for lock nesting order, calling contexts for various functions + * and anything else significant for in-kernel interfaces. But it is also + * impossible to test all drivers in a single machine, hence brute-force N vs. + * N testing of all combinations is impossible. Even just limiting to the + * possible combinations is infeasible. + * + * * There is an enormous amount of driver code involved. For render drivers + * there's the tail of command submission, after fences are published, + * scheduler code, interrupt and workers to process job completion, + * and timeout, gpu reset and gpu hang recovery code. Plus for integration + * with core mm with have &mmu_notifier, respectively &mmu_interval_notifier, + * and &shrinker. For modesetting drivers there's the commit tail functions + * between when fences for an atomic modeset are published, and when the + * corresponding vblank completes, including any interrupt processing and + * related workers. Auditing all that code, across all drivers, is not + * feasible. + * + * * Due to how many other subsystems are involved and the locking hierarchies + * this pulls in there is extremely thin wiggle-room for driver-specific + * differences. &dma_fence interacts with almost all of the core memory + * handling through page fault handlers via &dma_resv, dma_resv_lock() and + * dma_resv_unlock(). On the other side it also interacts through all + * allocation sites through &mmu_notifier and &shrinker. + * + * Furthermore lockdep does not handle cross-release dependencies, which means + * any deadlocks between dma_fence_wait() and dma_fence_signal() can't be caught + * at runtime with some quick testing. The simplest example is one thread + * waiting on a &dma_fence while holding a lock:: + * + * lock(A); + * dma_fence_wait(B); + * unlock(A); + * + * while the other thread is stuck trying to acquire the same lock, which + * prevents it from signalling the fence the previous thread is stuck waiting + * on:: + * + * lock(A); + * unlock(A); + * dma_fence_signal(B); + * + * By manually annotating all code relevant to signalling a &dma_fence we can + * teach lockdep about these dependencies, which also helps with the validation + * headache since now lockdep can check all the rules for us:: + * + * cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling(); + * lock(A); + * unlock(A); + * dma_fence_signal(B); + * dma_fence_end_signalling(cookie); + * + * For using dma_fence_begin_signalling() and dma_fence_end_signalling() to + * annotate critical sections the following rules need to be observed: + * + * * All code necessary to complete a &dma_fence must be annotated, from the + * point where a fence is accessible to other threads, to the point where + * dma_fence_signal() is called. Un-annotated code can contain deadlock issues, + * and due to the very strict rules and many corner cases it is infeasible to + * catch these just with review or normal stress testing. + * + * * &struct dma_resv deserves a special note, since the readers are only + * protected by rcu. This means the signalling critical section starts as soon + * as the new fences are installed, even before dma_resv_unlock() is called. + * + * * The only exception are fast paths and opportunistic signalling code, which + * calls dma_fence_signal() purely as an optimization, but is not required to + * guarantee completion of a &dma_fence. The usual example is a wait IOCTL + * which calls dma_fence_signal(), while the mandatory completion path goes + * through a hardware interrupt and possible job completion worker. + * + * * To aid composability of code, the annotations can be freely nested, as long + * as the overall locking hierarchy is consistent. The annotations also work + * both in interrupt and process context. Due to implementation details this + * requires that callers pass an opaque cookie from + * dma_fence_begin_signalling() to dma_fence_end_signalling(). + * + * * Validation against the cross driver contract is implemented by priming + * lockdep with the relevant hierarchy at boot-up. This means even just + * testing with a single device is enough to validate a driver, at least as + * far as deadlocks with dma_fence_wait() against dma_fence_signal() are + * concerned. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +struct lockdep_map dma_fence_lockdep_map = { + .name = "dma_fence_map" +}; + +/** + * dma_fence_begin_signalling - begin a critical DMA fence signalling section + * + * Drivers should use this to annotate the beginning of any code section + * required to eventually complete &dma_fence by calling dma_fence_signal(). + * + * The end of these critical sections are annotated with + * dma_fence_end_signalling(). + * + * Returns: + * + * Opaque cookie needed by the implementation, which needs to be passed to + * dma_fence_end_signalling(). + */ +bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void) +{ + /* explicitly nesting ... */ + if (lock_is_held_type(&dma_fence_lockdep_map, 1)) + return true; + + /* rely on might_sleep check for soft/hardirq locks */ + if (in_atomic()) + return true; + + /* ... and non-recursive readlock */ + lock_acquire(&dma_fence_lockdep_map, 0, 0, 1, 1, NULL, _RET_IP_); + + return false; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_begin_signalling); + +/** + * dma_fence_end_signalling - end a critical DMA fence signalling section + * + * Closes a critical section annotation opened by dma_fence_begin_signalling(). + */ +void dma_fence_end_signalling(bool cookie) +{ + if (cookie) + return; + + lock_release(&dma_fence_lockdep_map, _RET_IP_); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_end_signalling); + +void __dma_fence_might_wait(void) +{ + bool tmp; + + tmp = lock_is_held_type(&dma_fence_lockdep_map, 1); + if (tmp) + lock_release(&dma_fence_lockdep_map, _THIS_IP_); + lock_map_acquire(&dma_fence_lockdep_map); + lock_map_release(&dma_fence_lockdep_map); + if (tmp) + lock_acquire(&dma_fence_lockdep_map, 0, 0, 1, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_); +} +#endif + + /** * dma_fence_signal_locked - signal completion of a fence * @fence: the fence to signal @@ -170,14 +324,19 @@ int dma_fence_signal(struct dma_fence *fence) { unsigned long flags; int ret; + bool tmp; if (!fence) return -EINVAL; + tmp = dma_fence_begin_signalling(); + spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags); ret = dma_fence_signal_locked(fence); spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags); + dma_fence_end_signalling(tmp); + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_signal); @@ -210,6 +369,8 @@ dma_fence_wait_timeout(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, signed long timeout) might_sleep(); + __dma_fence_might_wait(); + trace_dma_fence_wait_start(fence); if (fence->ops->wait) ret = fence->ops->wait(fence, intr, timeout); diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h index 3347c54f3a87..3f288f7db2ef 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h @@ -357,6 +357,18 @@ dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(struct dma_fence __rcu **fencep) } while (1); } +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void); +void dma_fence_end_signalling(bool cookie); +#else +static inline bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void) +{ + return true; +} +static inline void dma_fence_end_signalling(bool cookie) {} +static inline void __dma_fence_might_wait(void) {} +#endif + int dma_fence_signal(struct dma_fence *fence); int dma_fence_signal_locked(struct dma_fence *fence); signed long dma_fence_default_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, -- 2.27.0

4 years, 2 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 04/25] drm/vkms: Annotate vblank timer

by Daniel Vetter

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:57 AM Melissa Wen <melissa.srw(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On 07/12, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Everything looks fine to me, I just noticed that the amdgpu patches did > > not apply smoothly, however it was trivial to fix the issues. > > > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo(a)gmail.com> > > > > Melissa, > > Since you are using vkms regularly, could you test this patch and review > > it? Remember to add your Tested-by when you finish. > > > Hi, > > I've applied the patch series, ran some tests on vkms, and found no > issues. I mean, things have remained stable. > > Tested-by: Melissa Wen <melissa.srw(a)gmail.com> Did you test with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING enabled in the kernel .config? Without that enabled, there's not really any change here, but with that enabled there might be some lockdep splats in dmesg indicating a problem. Thanks, Daniel > > > Thanks > > > > On 07/07, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > This is needed to signal the fences from page flips, annotate it > > > accordingly. We need to annotate entire timer callback since if we get > > > stuck anywhere in there, then the timer stops, and hence fences stop. > > > Just annotating the top part that does the vblank handling isn't > > > enough. > > > > > > Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org > > > Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org > > > Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> > > > Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo(a)gmail.com> > > > Cc: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa(a)gmail.com> > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel(a)ffwll.ch> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c | 8 +++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c > > > index ac85e17428f8..a53a40848a72 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c > > > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ > > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > > > > > +#include <linux/dma-fence.h> > > > + > > > #include <drm/drm_atomic.h> > > > #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> > > > #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h> > > > @@ -14,7 +16,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart vkms_vblank_simulate(struct hrtimer *timer) > > > struct drm_crtc *crtc = &output->crtc; > > > struct vkms_crtc_state *state; > > > u64 ret_overrun; > > > - bool ret; > > > + bool ret, fence_cookie; > > > + > > > + fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling(); > > > > > > ret_overrun = hrtimer_forward_now(&output->vblank_hrtimer, > > > output->period_ns); > > > @@ -49,6 +53,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart vkms_vblank_simulate(struct hrtimer *timer) > > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Composer worker already queued\n"); > > > } > > > > > > + dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie); > > > + > > > return HRTIMER_RESTART; > > > } > > > > > > -- > > > 2.27.0 > > > > > > > -- > > Rodrigo Siqueira > > https://siqueira.tech > > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

4 years, 2 months

[PATCH v7 00/36] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents vs. orig_nents misuse

by Marek Szyprowski

Dear All, During the Exynos DRM GEM rework and fixing the issues in the. drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() function [1] I've noticed that most drivers in DRM framework incorrectly use nents and orig_nents entries of the struct sg_table. In case of the most DMA-mapping implementations exchanging those two entries or using nents for all loops on the scatterlist is harmless, because they both have the same value. There exists however a DMA-mapping implementations, for which such incorrect usage breaks things. The nents returned by dma_map_sg() might be lower than the nents passed as its parameter and this is perfectly fine. DMA framework or IOMMU is allowed to join consecutive chunks while mapping if such operation is supported by the underlying HW (bus, bridge, IOMMU, etc). Example of the case where dma_map_sg() might return 1 'DMA' chunk for the 4 'physical' pages is described here [2] The DMA-mapping framework documentation [3] states that dma_map_sg() returns the numer of the created entries in the DMA address space. However the subsequent calls to dma_sync_sg_for_{device,cpu} and dma_unmap_sg must be called with the original number of entries passed to dma_map_sg. The common pattern in DRM drivers were to assign the dma_map_sg() return value to sg_table->nents and use that value for the subsequent calls to dma_sync_sg_* or dma_unmap_sg functions. Also the code iterated over nents times to access the pages stored in the processed scatterlist, while it should use orig_nents as the numer of the page entries. I've tried to identify all such incorrect usage of sg_table->nents and this is a result of my research. It looks that the incorrect pattern has been copied over the many drivers mainly in the DRM subsystem. Too bad in most cases it even worked correctly if the system used a simple, linear DMA-mapping implementation, for which swapping nents and orig_nents doesn't make any difference. To avoid similar issues in the future, I've introduced a common wrappers for DMA-mapping calls, which operate directly on the sg_table objects. I've also added wrappers for iterating over the scatterlists stored in the sg_table objects and applied them where possible. This, together with some common DRM prime helpers, allowed me to almost get rid of all nents/orig_nents usage in the drivers. I hope that such change makes the code robust, easier to follow and copy/paste safe. The biggest TODO is DRM/i915 driver and I don't feel brave enough to fix it fully. The driver creatively uses sg_table->orig_nents to store the size of the allocate scatterlist and ignores the number of the entries returned by dma_map_sg function. In this patchset I only fixed the sg_table objects exported by dmabuf related functions. I hope that I didn't break anything there. Patches are based on top of Linux next-20200618. The required changes to DMA-mapping framework has been already merged to v5.8-rc1. If possible I would like ask for merging most of the patches via DRM tree. Best regards, Marek Szyprowski References: [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/27/555 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/29/65 [3] Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200512121931.GD20393@lst.de/T/#ma18c9… Changelog: v7: - changed DMA page interators to standard DMA SG iterators in drm/prim and videobuf2-dma-contig as suggested by Robin Murphy - fixed build issues v6: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200618153956.29558-1-m.szyprowski@sam… - rebased onto Linux next-20200618, which is based on v5.8-rc1; fixed conflicts v5: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200513132114.6046-1-m.szyprowski@sams… - fixed some minor style issues and typos - fixed lack of the attrs argument in ion, dmabuf, rapidio, fastrpc and vfio patches v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200512121931.GD20393@lst.de/T/ - added for_each_sgtable_* wrappers and applied where possible - added drm_prime_get_contiguous_size() and applied where possible - applied drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() where possible to remove page extraction from sg_table objects - added documentation for the introduced wrappers - improved patches description a bit v3: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20200505083926.28503-1-m.szyprowski@samsu… - introduce dma_*_sgtable_* wrappers and use them in all patches v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/c01c9766-9778-fd1f-f36e-2dc7bd376ba4@ar… - dropped most of the changes to drm/i915 - added fixes for rcar-du, xen, media and ion - fixed a few issues pointed by kbuild test robot - added wide cc: list for each patch v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/c01c9766-9778-fd1f-f36e-2dc7bd376ba4@ar… - initial version Patch summary: Marek Szyprowski (36): drm: prime: add common helper to check scatterlist contiguity drm: prime: use sgtable iterators in drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() drm: core: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: amdgpu: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: armada: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: etnaviv: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: exynos: use common helper for a scatterlist contiguity check drm: exynos: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: i915: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: lima: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: mediatek: use common helper for a scatterlist contiguity check drm: mediatek: use common helper for extracting pages array drm: msm: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: omapdrm: use common helper for extracting pages array drm: omapdrm: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: panfrost: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: radeon: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: rockchip: use common helper for a scatterlist contiguity check drm: rockchip: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: tegra: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: v3d: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: virtio: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: vmwgfx: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: xen: fix common struct sg_table related issues xen: gntdev: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: host1x: fix common struct sg_table related issues drm: rcar-du: fix common struct sg_table related issues dmabuf: fix common struct sg_table related issues staging: ion: remove dead code staging: ion: fix common struct sg_table related issues staging: tegra-vde: fix common struct sg_table related issues misc: fastrpc: fix common struct sg_table related issues rapidio: fix common struct sg_table related issues samples: vfio-mdev/mbochs: fix common struct sg_table related issues media: pci: fix common ALSA DMA-mapping related codes videobuf2: use sgtable-based scatterlist wrappers drivers/dma-buf/heaps/heap-helpers.c | 13 ++- drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 9 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c | 12 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 23 +---- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 14 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 91 +++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem.c | 12 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_mmu.c | 13 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_g2d.c | 10 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c | 23 +---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 11 +-- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/mock_dmabuf.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c | 11 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_gem.c | 37 ++------ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 13 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpummu.c | 14 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c | 20 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c | 7 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 11 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_vsp.c | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_gem.c | 42 +++------ drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c | 27 ++---- drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/plane.c | 15 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_mmu.c | 13 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 36 +++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 12 +-- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_ttm_buffer.c | 17 +--- drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_gem.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/host1x/job.c | 22 ++--- .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 34 +++---- .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c | 32 +++---- .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c | 12 +-- drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-alsa.c | 2 +- drivers/media/pci/cx25821/cx25821-alsa.c | 2 +- drivers/media/pci/cx88/cx88-alsa.c | 2 +- drivers/media/pci/saa7134/saa7134-alsa.c | 2 +- drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 8 +- drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 4 +- drivers/rapidio/devices/rio_mport_cdev.c | 8 +- drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 25 +++-- drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.h | 1 - drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_heap.c | 53 +++-------- drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/media/tegra-vde/iommu.c | 4 +- drivers/xen/gntdev-dmabuf.c | 13 ++- include/drm/drm_prime.h | 2 + samples/vfio-mdev/mbochs.c | 3 +- 54 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 471 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1

4 years, 3 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Daniel Vetter

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:23 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:02:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > dma_fence only possibly makes some sense if you intend to expose the > > > completion outside a single driver. > > > > > > The prefered kernel design pattern for this is to connect things with > > > a function callback. > > > > > > So the actual use case of dma_fence is quite narrow and tightly linked > > > to DRM. > > > > > > I don't think we should spread this beyond DRM, I can't see a reason. > > > > Yeah v4l has a legit reason to use dma_fence, android wants that > > there. > > 'legit' in the sense the v4l is supposed to trigger stuff in DRM when > V4L DMA completes? I would still see that as part of DRM Yes, and also the other way around. But thus far it didn't land. -Daniel > Or is it building a parallel DRM like DMA completion graph? > > > > Trying to improve performance of limited HW by using sketchy > > > techniques at the cost of general system stability should be a NAK. > > > > Well that's pretty much gpu drivers, all the horrors for a bit more speed :-) > > > > On the text itself, should I upgrade to "must not" instead of "should > > not"? Or more needed? > > Fundamentally having some unknowable graph of dependencies where parts > of the graph can be placed in critical regions like notifiers is a > complete maintenance nightmare. > > I think building systems like this should be discouraged :\ -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

4 years, 3 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Daniel Vetter

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:01:10PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Am 10.07.20 um 14:54 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:48:16PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > > Am 10.07.20 um 14:43 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > > > > > > > > > Below the paragraph I've added after our discussions around dma-fences > > > > > > outside of drivers/gpu. Good enough for an ack on this, or want something > > > > > > changed? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring > > > > > > > + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to > > > > > > > + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of > > > > > > > + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. > > > > > I was hoping we'd get to 'no driver outside GPU should even use > > > > > dma_fence()' > > > > My last status was that V4L could come use dma_fences as well. > > > I'm sure lots of places *could* use it, but I think I understood that > > > it is a bad idea unless you have to fit into the DRM uAPI? > > > > It would be a bit questionable if you use the container objects we came up > > with in the DRM subsystem outside of it. > > > > But using the dma_fence itself makes sense for everything which could do > > async DMA in general. > > dma_fence only possibly makes some sense if you intend to expose the > completion outside a single driver. > > The prefered kernel design pattern for this is to connect things with > a function callback. > > So the actual use case of dma_fence is quite narrow and tightly linked > to DRM. > > I don't think we should spread this beyond DRM, I can't see a reason. Yeah v4l has a legit reason to use dma_fence, android wants that there. There's even been patches proposed years ago, but never landed because android is using some vendor hack horror show for camera drivers right now. But there is an effort going on to fix that (under the libcamera heading), and I expect that once we have that, it'll want dma_fence support. So outright excluding everyone from dma_fence is a bit too much. They definitely shouldn't be used though for entirely independent stuff. > > > You are better to do something contained in the single driver where > > > locking can be analyzed. > > > > > > > I'm not 100% sure, but wouldn't MMU notifier + dma_fence be a valid use case > > > > for things like custom FPGA interfaces as well? > > > I don't think we should expand the list of drivers that use this > > > technique. > > > Drivers that can't suspend should pin memory, not use blocked > > > notifiers to created pinned memory. > > > > Agreed totally, it's a complete pain to maintain even for the GPU drivers. > > > > Unfortunately that doesn't change users from requesting it. So I'm pretty > > sure we are going to see more of this. > > Kernel maintainers need to say no. > > The proper way to do DMA on no-faulting hardware is page pinning. > > Trying to improve performance of limited HW by using sketchy > techniques at the cost of general system stability should be a NAK. Well that's pretty much gpu drivers, all the horrors for a bit more speed :-) On the text itself, should I upgrade to "must not" instead of "should not"? Or more needed? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

4 years, 3 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Christian König

Am 10.07.20 um 14:54 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:48:16PM +0200, Christian König wrote: >> Am 10.07.20 um 14:43 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: >>> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> Below the paragraph I've added after our discussions around dma-fences >>>> outside of drivers/gpu. Good enough for an ack on this, or want something >>>> changed? >>>> >>>> Thanks, Daniel >>>> >>>>> + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring >>>>> + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to >>>>> + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of >>>>> + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. >>> I was hoping we'd get to 'no driver outside GPU should even use >>> dma_fence()' >> My last status was that V4L could come use dma_fences as well. > I'm sure lots of places *could* use it, but I think I understood that > it is a bad idea unless you have to fit into the DRM uAPI? It would be a bit questionable if you use the container objects we came up with in the DRM subsystem outside of it. But using the dma_fence itself makes sense for everything which could do async DMA in general. > You are better to do something contained in the single driver where > locking can be analyzed. > >> I'm not 100% sure, but wouldn't MMU notifier + dma_fence be a valid use case >> for things like custom FPGA interfaces as well? > I don't think we should expand the list of drivers that use this > technique. > Drivers that can't suspend should pin memory, not use blocked > notifiers to created pinned memory. Agreed totally, it's a complete pain to maintain even for the GPU drivers. Unfortunately that doesn't change users from requesting it. So I'm pretty sure we are going to see more of this. Christian. > > Jason

4 years, 3 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Christian König

Am 10.07.20 um 14:43 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> Below the paragraph I've added after our discussions around dma-fences >> outside of drivers/gpu. Good enough for an ack on this, or want something >> changed? >> >> Thanks, Daniel >> >>> + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring >>> + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to >>> + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of >>> + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. > I was hoping we'd get to 'no driver outside GPU should even use > dma_fence()' My last status was that V4L could come use dma_fences as well. I'm not 100% sure, but wouldn't MMU notifier + dma_fence be a valid use case for things like custom FPGA interfaces as well? > Is that not reasonable? > > When your annotations once anything uses dma_fence it has to assume > the worst cases, right? Well a defensive approach is usually the best idea, yes. Christian. > > Jason

4 years, 3 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] staging: android: ion: Skip sync if not mapped

by John Stultz

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:22 AM Christian Brauner <christian.brauner(a)ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:25:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:41:31PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > But I do think we can mark it as deprecated and let folks know that > > > around the end of the year it will be deleted. > > > > No one ever notices "depreciated" things, they only notice if the code > > is no longer there :) > > > > So I'm all for just deleting it and seeing who even notices... > > Agreed. I mean, I get there's not much love for ION in staging, and I too am eager to see it go, but I also feel like in the discussions around submitting the dmabuf heaps at talks, etc, that there was clear value in removing ION after a short time so that folks could transition being able to test both implementations against the same kernel so performance regressions, etc could be worked out. I am actively getting many requests for help for vendors who are looking at dmabuf heaps and are starting the transition process, and I'm trying my best to motivate them to directly work within the community so their needed heap functionality can go upstream. But it's going to be a process, and their first attempts aren't going to magically land upstream. I think being able to really compare their implementations as they iterate and push things upstream will help in order to be able to have upstream solutions that are also properly functional for production usage. The dmabuf heaps have been in an official kernel now for all of three weeks. So yea, we can "delete [ION] and see who even notices", but I worry that may seem a bit like contempt for the folks doing the work on transitioning over, which doesn't help getting them to participate within the community. thanks -john

4 years, 3 months

[PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Daniel Vetter

Two in one go: - it is allowed to call dma_fence_wait() while holding a dma_resv_lock(). This is fundamental to how eviction works with ttm, so required. - it is allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from memory reclaim contexts, specifically from shrinker callbacks (which i915 does), and from mmu notifier callbacks (which amdgpu does, and which i915 sometimes also does, and probably always should, but that's kinda a debate). Also for stuff like HMM we really need to be able to do this, or things get real dicey. Consequence is that any critical path necessary to get to a dma_fence_signal for a fence must never a) call dma_resv_lock nor b) allocate memory with GFP_KERNEL. Also by implication of dma_resv_lock(), no userspace faulting allowed. That's some supremely obnoxious limitations, which is why we need to sprinkle the right annotations to all relevant paths. The one big locking context we're leaving out here is mmu notifiers, added in commit 23b68395c7c78a764e8963fc15a7cfd318bf187f Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)ffwll.ch> Date: Mon Aug 26 22:14:21 2019 +0200 mm/mmu_notifiers: add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start/end that one covers a lot of other callsites, and it's also allowed to wait on dma-fences from mmu notifiers. But there's no ready-made functions exposed to prime this, so I've left it out for now. v2: Also track against mmu notifier context. v3: kerneldoc to spec the cross-driver contract. Note that currently i915 throws in a hard-coded 10s timeout on foreign fences (not sure why that was done, but it's there), which is why that rule is worded with SHOULD instead of MUST. Also some of the mmu_notifier/shrinker rules might surprise SoC drivers, I haven't fully audited them all. Which is infeasible anyway, we'll need to run them with lockdep and dma-fence annotations and see what goes boom. v4: A spelling fix from Mika v5: #ifdef for CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER. Reported by 0day. Unfortunately this means lockdep enforcement is slightly inconsistent, it won't spot GFP_NOIO and GFP_NOFS allocations in the wrong spot if CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER is disabled in the kernel config. Oh well. v5: Note that only drivers/gpu has a reasonable (or at least historical) excuse to use dma_fence_wait() from shrinker and mmu notifier callbacks. Everyone else should either have a better memory manager model, or better hardware. This reflects discussions with Jason Gunthorpe. Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)mellanox.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling(a)amd.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom(a)intel.com> (v4) Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala(a)intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom(a)intel.com> Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> --- Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 6 ++++ drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 8 +++++ include/linux/dma-fence.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst index 05d856131140..f8f6decde359 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst @@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ DMA Fences .. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c :doc: DMA fences overview +DMA Fence Cross-Driver Contract +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c + :doc: fence cross-driver contract + DMA Fence Signalling Annotations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c index 0005bc002529..af1d8ea926b3 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -64,6 +64,52 @@ static atomic64_t dma_fence_context_counter = ATOMIC64_INIT(1); * &dma_buf.resv pointer. */ +/** + * DOC: fence cross-driver contract + * + * Since &dma_fence provide a cross driver contract, all drivers must follow the + * same rules: + * + * * Fences must complete in a reasonable time. Fences which represent kernels + * and shaders submitted by userspace, which could run forever, must be backed + * up by timeout and gpu hang recovery code. Minimally that code must prevent + * further command submission and force complete all in-flight fences, e.g. + * when the driver or hardware do not support gpu reset, or if the gpu reset + * failed for some reason. Ideally the driver supports gpu recovery which only + * affects the offending userspace context, and no other userspace + * submissions. + * + * * Drivers may have different ideas of what completion within a reasonable + * time means. Some hang recovery code uses a fixed timeout, others a mix + * between observing forward progress and increasingly strict timeouts. + * Drivers should not try to second guess timeout handling of fences from + * other drivers. + * + * * To ensure there's no deadlocks of dma_fence_wait() against other locks + * drivers should annotate all code required to reach dma_fence_signal(), + * which completes the fences, with dma_fence_begin_signalling() and + * dma_fence_end_signalling(). + * + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() while holding dma_resv_lock(). + * This means any code required for fence completion cannot acquire a + * &dma_resv lock. Note that this also pulls in the entire established + * locking hierarchy around dma_resv_lock() and dma_resv_unlock(). + * + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from their &shrinker + * callbacks. This means any code required for fence completion cannot + * allocate memory with GFP_KERNEL. + * + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from their &mmu_notifier + * respectively &mmu_interval_notifier callbacks. This means any code required + * for fence completeion cannot allocate memory with GFP_NOFS or GFP_NOIO. + * Only GFP_ATOMIC is permissible, which might fail. + * + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. + */ + static const char *dma_fence_stub_get_name(struct dma_fence *fence) { return "stub"; diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c index e7d7197d48ce..0e6675ec1d11 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/sched/mm.h> +#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h> /** * DOC: Reservation Object Overview @@ -116,6 +117,13 @@ static int __init dma_resv_lockdep(void) if (ret == -EDEADLK) dma_resv_lock_slow(&obj, &ctx); fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER + lock_map_acquire(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); + __dma_fence_might_wait(); + lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); +#else + __dma_fence_might_wait(); +#endif fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); ww_mutex_unlock(&obj.lock); ww_acquire_fini(&ctx); diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h index 3f288f7db2ef..09e23adb351d 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(struct dma_fence __rcu **fencep) #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void); void dma_fence_end_signalling(bool cookie); +void __dma_fence_might_wait(void); #else static inline bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void) { -- 2.27.0

4 years, 3 months

[PATCH 25/25] drm/amdgpu: gpu recovery does full modesets

by Daniel Vetter

... I think it's time to stop this little exercise. The lockdep splat, for the record: [ 132.583381] ====================================================== [ 132.584091] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 132.584775] 5.7.0-rc3+ #346 Tainted: G W [ 132.585461] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 132.586184] kworker/2:3/865 is trying to acquire lock: [ 132.586857] ffffc90000677c70 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.587569] but task is already holding lock: [ 132.589044] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.589803] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 132.592009] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 132.593507] -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: [ 132.595019] dma_fence_begin_signalling+0x50/0x60 [ 132.595767] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0xa1/0x180 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.596567] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x1ea/0x250 [drm] [ 132.597420] drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x55/0x190 [drm] [ 132.598178] drm_client_modeset_commit+0x24/0x40 [drm] [ 132.598948] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x4b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.599738] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x30/0x40 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.600539] fbcon_init+0x2e8/0x660 [ 132.601344] visual_init+0xce/0x130 [ 132.602156] do_bind_con_driver+0x1bc/0x2b0 [ 132.602970] do_take_over_console+0x115/0x180 [ 132.603763] do_fbcon_takeover+0x58/0xb0 [ 132.604564] register_framebuffer+0x1ee/0x300 [ 132.605369] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36e/0x520 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.606187] amdgpu_fbdev_init+0xb3/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ 132.607032] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xe90/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.607862] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.608697] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.609511] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.610324] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.611130] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.611939] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.612766] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.613593] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.614419] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.615249] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.616071] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.616902] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.617731] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.618560] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.619391] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.620228] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.621064] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.621903] -> #1 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 132.623587] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xcc/0x10c0 [ 132.624448] ww_mutex_lock+0x43/0xb0 [ 132.625315] drm_modeset_lock+0x44/0x120 [drm] [ 132.626184] drmm_mode_config_init+0x2db/0x8b0 [drm] [ 132.627098] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xbd1/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.628007] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.628920] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.629804] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.630690] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.631583] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.632479] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.633379] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.634275] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.635170] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.636069] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.636974] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.637870] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.638765] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.639654] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.640522] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.641372] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.642203] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.643022] -> #0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 132.644643] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.645469] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.646274] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.647071] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.647902] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.648698] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.649498] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.650300] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.651084] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.651825] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.652594] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.653402] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.654139] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.654868] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 132.655598] other info that might help us debug this: [ 132.657739] Chain exists of: crtc_ww_class_acquire --> crtc_ww_class_mutex --> dma_fence_map [ 132.659877] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 132.661416] CPU0 CPU1 [ 132.662126] ---- ---- [ 132.662847] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.663574] lock(crtc_ww_class_mutex); [ 132.664319] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.665063] lock(crtc_ww_class_acquire); [ 132.665799] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 132.667965] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/865: [ 132.668701] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.669462] #1: ffffc90000677e58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.670242] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.671039] #3: ffff8887b84a1748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x59e/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.671902] stack backtrace: [ 132.673515] CPU: 2 PID: 865 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ #346 [ 132.674347] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018 [ 132.675194] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched] [ 132.676046] Call Trace: [ 132.676897] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0 [ 132.677748] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 [ 132.678604] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 132.679459] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.680311] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.681163] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.682021] ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20 [ 132.682880] ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x14/0x40 [ 132.683737] ? __module_address+0x28/0xf0 [ 132.684601] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.685466] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.686335] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.687255] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.688152] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.689057] ? amdgpu_fence_process+0x4c/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.689963] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.690893] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.691818] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.692707] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.693597] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.694487] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.695373] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 132.696264] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.697154] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 132.698057] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c index 44b321eecc3d..910c86f577b2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c @@ -2477,6 +2477,14 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1(struct amdgpu_device *adev) /* displays are handled separately */ if (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_DCE) { /* XXX handle errors */ + + /* + * This is dm_suspend, which calls modeset locks, and + * that a pretty good inversion against dma_fence_signal + * which gpu recovery is supposed to guarantee. + * + * Dont ask me how to fix this. + */ r = adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->suspend(adev); /* XXX handle errors */ if (r) { -- 2.27.0

4 years, 3 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig July 2020