On 16.09.25 13:58, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>
>
> Le 16/09/2025 à 12:52, Christian König a écrit :
>> On 16.09.25 11:46, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 16/09/2025 à 11:25, Christian König a écrit :
>>>> On 16.09.25 09:08, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>>>>> amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem has a single caller, make sure the out
>>>>> fence is non-NULL to simplify the code.
>>>>> Since none of the pointers should be NULL, we can enable
>>>>> __attribute__((nonnull))__.
>>>>>
>>>>> While at it make the function static since it's only used from
>>>>> amdgpuu_ttm.c.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer(a)amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 6 ------
>>>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>>>> index 27ab4e754b2a..70b817b5578d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>>>> @@ -284,12 +284,13 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_map_buffer(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>> * move and different for a BO to BO copy.
>>>>> *
>>>>> */
>>>>> -int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *src,
>>>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *dst,
>>>>> - uint64_t size, bool tmz,
>>>>> - struct dma_resv *resv,
>>>>> - struct dma_fence **f)
>>>>> +__attribute__((nonnull))
>>>>
>>>> That looks fishy.
>>>>
>>>>> +static int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> + const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *src,
>>>>> + const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *dst,
>>>>> + uint64_t size, bool tmz,
>>>>> + struct dma_resv *resv,
>>>>> + struct dma_fence **f)
>>>>
>>>> I'm not an expert for those, but looking at other examples that should be here and look something like:
>>>>
>>>> __attribute__((nonnull(7)))
>>>
>>> Both syntax are valid. The GCC docs says:
>>>
>>> If no arg-index is given to the nonnull attribute, all pointer arguments are marked as non-null
>>
>> Never seen that before. Is that gcc specifc or standardized?
>
> clang supports it:
>
> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#id10
>
> And both syntaxes are already used in the drm subtree by i915.
Ok in that case Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com>.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Pierre-Eric
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But I think for this case here it is also not a must have to have that.
>>>
>>> I can remove it if you prefer, but it doesn't hurt to have the compiler validate usage of the functions.
>>
>> Yeah it's clearly useful, but I'm worried that clang won't like it.
>>
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Pierre-Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>>>>> struct amdgpu_res_cursor src_mm, dst_mm;
>>>>> @@ -363,9 +364,7 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> }
>>>>> error:
>>>>> mutex_unlock(&adev->mman.gtt_window_lock);
>>>>> - if (f)
>>>>> - *f = dma_fence_get(fence);
>>>>> - dma_fence_put(fence);
>>>>> + *f = fence;
>>>>> return r;
>>>>> }
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>>>> index bb17987f0447..07ae2853c77c 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>>>> @@ -170,12 +170,6 @@ int amdgpu_copy_buffer(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t src_offset,
>>>>> struct dma_resv *resv,
>>>>> struct dma_fence **fence, bool direct_submit,
>>>>> bool vm_needs_flush, uint32_t copy_flags);
>>>>> -int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *src,
>>>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *dst,
>>>>> - uint64_t size, bool tmz,
>>>>> - struct dma_resv *resv,
>>>>> - struct dma_fence **f);
>>>>> int amdgpu_ttm_clear_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>>>>> struct dma_resv *resv,
>>>>> struct dma_fence **fence);
>>
On 16.09.25 11:46, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>
>
> Le 16/09/2025 à 11:25, Christian König a écrit :
>> On 16.09.25 09:08, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
>>> amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem has a single caller, make sure the out
>>> fence is non-NULL to simplify the code.
>>> Since none of the pointers should be NULL, we can enable
>>> __attribute__((nonnull))__.
>>>
>>> While at it make the function static since it's only used from
>>> amdgpuu_ttm.c.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer(a)amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 17 ++++++++---------
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h | 6 ------
>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>> index 27ab4e754b2a..70b817b5578d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>> @@ -284,12 +284,13 @@ static int amdgpu_ttm_map_buffer(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> * move and different for a BO to BO copy.
>>> *
>>> */
>>> -int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *src,
>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *dst,
>>> - uint64_t size, bool tmz,
>>> - struct dma_resv *resv,
>>> - struct dma_fence **f)
>>> +__attribute__((nonnull))
>>
>> That looks fishy.
>>
>>> +static int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> + const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *src,
>>> + const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *dst,
>>> + uint64_t size, bool tmz,
>>> + struct dma_resv *resv,
>>> + struct dma_fence **f)
>>
>> I'm not an expert for those, but looking at other examples that should be here and look something like:
>>
>> __attribute__((nonnull(7)))
>
> Both syntax are valid. The GCC docs says:
>
> If no arg-index is given to the nonnull attribute, all pointer arguments are marked as non-null
Never seen that before. Is that gcc specifc or standardized?
>
>
>>
>> But I think for this case here it is also not a must have to have that.
>
> I can remove it if you prefer, but it doesn't hurt to have the compiler validate usage of the functions.
Yeah it's clearly useful, but I'm worried that clang won't like it.
Christian.
>
> Pierre-Eric
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> {
>>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
>>> struct amdgpu_res_cursor src_mm, dst_mm;
>>> @@ -363,9 +364,7 @@ int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> }
>>> error:
>>> mutex_unlock(&adev->mman.gtt_window_lock);
>>> - if (f)
>>> - *f = dma_fence_get(fence);
>>> - dma_fence_put(fence);
>>> + *f = fence;
>>> return r;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>> index bb17987f0447..07ae2853c77c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.h
>>> @@ -170,12 +170,6 @@ int amdgpu_copy_buffer(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint64_t src_offset,
>>> struct dma_resv *resv,
>>> struct dma_fence **fence, bool direct_submit,
>>> bool vm_needs_flush, uint32_t copy_flags);
>>> -int amdgpu_ttm_copy_mem_to_mem(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *src,
>>> - const struct amdgpu_copy_mem *dst,
>>> - uint64_t size, bool tmz,
>>> - struct dma_resv *resv,
>>> - struct dma_fence **f);
>>> int amdgpu_ttm_clear_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>>> struct dma_resv *resv,
>>> struct dma_fence **fence);
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 6:07 AM Amirreza Zarrabi
<amirreza.zarrabi(a)oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> This patch series introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)
> driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE). QTEE enables Trusted Applications (TAs)
> and services to run securely. It uses an object-based interface, where
> each service is an object with sets of operations. Clients can invoke
> these operations on objects, which can generate results, including other
> objects. For example, an object can load a TA and return another object
> that represents the loaded TA, allowing access to its services.
>
[snip]
I'm OK with the TEE patches, Sumit and I have reviewed them.
There were some minor conflicts with other patches I have in the pipe
for this merge window, so this patchset is on top of what I have to
avoid merge conflicts.
However, the firmware patches are for code maintained by Björn.
Björn, how would you like to do this? Can I take them via my tree, or
what do you suggest?
It's urgent to get this patchset into linux-next if it's to make it
for the coming merge window. Ideally, I'd like to send my pull request
to arm-soc during this week.
Cheers,
Jens
>
> ---
> Amirreza Zarrabi (11):
> firmware: qcom: tzmem: export shm_bridge create/delete
> firmware: qcom: scm: add support for object invocation
> tee: allow a driver to allocate a tee_device without a pool
> tee: add close_context to TEE driver operation
> tee: add TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_UBUF
> tee: add TEE_IOCTL_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_OBJREF
> tee: increase TEE_MAX_ARG_SIZE to 4096
> tee: add Qualcomm TEE driver
> tee: qcom: add primordial object
> tee: qcom: enable TEE_IOC_SHM_ALLOC ioctl
> Documentation: tee: Add Qualcomm TEE driver
>
> Documentation/tee/index.rst | 1 +
> Documentation/tee/qtee.rst | 96 ++++
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.c | 119 ++++
> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h | 7 +
> drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c | 63 ++-
> drivers/tee/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/tee/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/Makefile | 9 +
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/async.c | 182 ++++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/call.c | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c | 915 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/mem_obj.c | 169 ++++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/primordial_obj.c | 113 ++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee.h | 185 +++++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_msg.h | 304 ++++++++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/qcomtee_object.h | 316 +++++++++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/shm.c | 150 +++++
> drivers/tee/qcomtee/user_obj.c | 692 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 127 ++++-
> drivers/tee/tee_private.h | 6 -
> include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h | 6 +
> include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.h | 15 +
> include/linux/tee_core.h | 54 +-
> include/linux/tee_drv.h | 12 +
> include/uapi/linux/tee.h | 56 +-
> 27 files changed, 4410 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 8b8aefa5a5c7d4a65883e5653cf12f94c0b68dbf
> change-id: 20241202-qcom-tee-using-tee-ss-without-mem-obj-362c66340527
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi(a)oss.qualcomm.com>
>
Now that we're getting close to reaching the finish line for upstreaming
the rust gem shmem bindings, we've got another batch of patches that
have been reviewed and can be safely pushed to drm-rust-next
independently of the rest of the series.
These patches of course apply against the drm-rust-next branch, and are
part of the gem shmem series, the latest version of which can be found
here:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/146465/
Lyude Paul (3):
drm/gem/shmem: Extract drm_gem_shmem_init() from
drm_gem_shmem_create()
drm/gem/shmem: Extract drm_gem_shmem_release() from
drm_gem_shmem_free()
rust: Add dma_buf stub bindings
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++--------
include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h | 2 +
rust/kernel/dma_buf.rs | 40 +++++++++++
rust/kernel/lib.rs | 1 +
4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 rust/kernel/dma_buf.rs
base-commit: cf4fd52e323604ccfa8390917593e1fb965653ee
--
2.51.0
On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:07:39 -0700, Amirreza Zarrabi wrote:
> This patch series introduces a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE)
> driver for Qualcomm TEE (QTEE). QTEE enables Trusted Applications (TAs)
> and services to run securely. It uses an object-based interface, where
> each service is an object with sets of operations. Clients can invoke
> these operations on objects, which can generate results, including other
> objects. For example, an object can load a TA and return another object
> that represents the loaded TA, allowing access to its services.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[01/11] firmware: qcom: tzmem: export shm_bridge create/delete
commit: 8aa1e3a6f0ffbcfdf3bd7d87feb9090f96c54bc4
[02/11] firmware: qcom: scm: add support for object invocation
commit: 4b700098c0fc4a76c5c1e54465c8f35e13755294
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <andersson(a)kernel.org>