On Fri, 21 Jun 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:
The issue is one of communication and the way reviews are conducted.
Reviewing other people's work is challenging and requires a certain skill-set, of which _excellent_ communication skills are non-negotiable.
Patch feedback and change tolerance can vary also according to involved communities.
Agreed.
For this community, I suggest you build your skills for a while longer.
Why not concentrate on more complex submissions for a while and grow your repertoire of common review points,
Further collateral evolution can be considered there depending on corresponding development resources.
rather than repeating the same few over and over?
Some factors are probably known also according to corresponding statistics. Several contributors are stumbling on recurring improvement possibilities in published information.
Right, this will always be true, however the few you've picked up on are not important enough to keep reiterating. By doing so, you're receiving undesirable attention.
Reading other, more experienced maintainer's reviews would also be a good use of your time.
I am trying to influence adjustments in desirable directions for a while.
Never stop trying to improve.
These are only my opinions of course. Take the advice or leave it.
There's no need to reply to this.