Hi Jakub,
Of course the CI is confused and reports regressions because after your patch there are new "FAIL" enabled since you fixed the "ERROR" cases.
It sees new "FAIL" and interprets that as a regression.
Thanks,
Christophe
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 17:17, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel.
We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1071 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix.
In gcc_check master-aarch64 after:
| commit gcc-14-6456-gdabd94da0c7 | Author: Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com | Date: Tue Dec 12 13:07:35 2023 +0100 | | testsuite: Fix up test directive syntax errors | | I've noticed | +ERROR: gcc.dg/gomp/pr87887-1.c: syntax error in target selector ".-4" for " dg-warning 13 "unsupported return type ‘struct S’ for ‘simd’ functions" { target aarch64*-*-* } .-4 " | +ERROR: gcc.dg/gomp/pr87887-1.c: syntax error in target selector ".-4" for " dg-warning 13 "unsupported return type ‘struct S’ for ‘simd’ functions" { target aarch64*-*-* } .-4 " | +ERROR: gcc.dg/gomp/pr89246-1.c: syntax error in target selector ".-4" for " dg-warning 11 "unsupported argument type ‘__int128’ for ‘simd’ functions" { target aarch64*-*-* } .-4 " | +ERROR: gcc.dg/gomp/pr89246-1.c: syntax error in target selector ".-4" for " dg-warning 11 "unsupported argument type ‘__int128’ for ‘simd’ functions" { target aarch64*-*-* } .-4 " | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted.
FAIL: 4 regressions: 3 progressions
regressions.sum: === gcc tests ===
Running gcc:gcc.dg/gomp/gomp.exp ... FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/pr87887-1.c at line 13 (test for warnings, line 9) FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/pr87887-1.c at line 21 (test for warnings, line 17) FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/pr89246-1.c at line 11 (test for warnings, line 7) FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/simd-clones-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized "_ZGVnN4vvva32_addit"
=== Results Summary ===progressions.sum: === gcc tests ===
Running gcc:gcc.dg/gomp/gomp.exp ... ERROR: gcc.dg/gomp/pr87887-1.c: syntax error in target selector ".-4" for " dg-warning 13 "unsupported return type ‘struct S’ for ‘simd’ functions" { target aarch64*-*-* } .-4 " ERROR: gcc.dg/gomp/pr89246-1.c: syntax error in target selector ".-4" for " dg-warning 11 "unsupported argument type ‘__int128’ for ‘simd’ functions" { target aarch64*-*-* } .-4 " ERROR: gcc.dg/gomp/simd-clones-2.c: unmatched open quote in list for " dg-final 19 { scan-tree-dump "_ZGVnN2ua32vl_setArray" "optimized { target aarch64*-*-* } } "
=== Results Summary ===You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
The full lists of regressions and progressions are in
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1339/artifact... Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1338/artifact...
Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha...
Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/dabd94da0c78f4beb0c2c25f38ab6de2d84...
List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
- tcwg_gcc_check
** master-aarch64 *** FAIL: 4 regressions: 3 progressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha... *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1339/artifact...