On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Peter Maydell peter.maydell@linaro.org wrote:
On 10 November 2010 21:14, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Peter Maydell peter.maydell@linaro.org wrote:
I've had a look at these and fleshed them out mostly. There are some oddities: * why are maintain-beagle-models and qemu-continuous-integration under "tr-toolchain-consolidate-qemu" and not "tr-toolchain-integration" ?
I think consolidation is an on-going process (hence the 'maintain' blueprint) and that CI will help the process.
Hmm. To me consolidation is all about pushing patches upstream (and we have a different blueprint for pushing omap patches upstream); I intended maintain-beagle-models to cover the stuff we wouldn't be doing if we didn't want to keep the qemu beagle model working as a platform for testing and demoing Linaro images. That's what I thought "integration" was for...
* should sound-support really be a "Medium" ? I thought we decided at UDS that it wasn't all that important
It's medium compared to the other blueprints in it's group.
You're using these as relative and not absolute priority levels? That's kind of confusing...
It is. I don't have enough fidelity in the current system to show priority vs local priority vs schedule.
OK, can you mark them as such then so others know? Update the whiteboard with a note and add the line 'Tags: community' to the end of the whiteboard.
OK. ...audio was in this group, by the way.
Yip, you already have too much to do. I hope to do the planning today to see what we can actually achieve.
-- Michael