On 12 May 2015 at 23:33, Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 12 May 2015 22:07:53 Baolin Wang wrote:
}
+static void default_timer_get64(struct k_itimer *timr,
struct itimerspec64 *cur_setting64)
+{
struct itimerspec cur_setting;
struct k_clock *kc = clockid_to_kclock(timr->it_clock);
kc->timer_get(timr, &cur_setting);
*cur_setting64 = itimerspec_to_itimerspec64(&cur_setting);
+}
The new version is correct, but when I asked you in private to send the update, what I meant was a reply to my email, and only the updated function for the sake of discussion. You have now sent the patch as a new thread, which means we have two email conversations with the same subject line and different contents, which is rather confusing and should be avoided.
Arnd
Sorry to cause the confusion. Cause i reorder the patch, and i'll avoid this situation in the future. Thanks.