On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 04:05:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org wrote:

...

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

...

The two do the same thing, but we want to have a consistent naming in the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de

drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c index 41aea12e2bcc..b45c73dd37a5 100644 --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_cmd_get_time(struct optee_msg_arg *arg) OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT) goto bad;

• getnstimeofday64(&ts);
  

• ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts);
  arg->params[0].u.value.a = ts.tv_sec;
  arg->params[0].u.value.b = ts.tv_nsec;
  
  

-- 2.9.0

Looks good.

Acked-by: Jens Wiklander jens.wiklander@linaro.org

Thanks for the review. Can you pick it up in your tree?

OK, I'll pick it up.

Thanks, Jens