I will post xfs tests that validate mount and range checking. I will keep the policy same as what the RFC suggests for now.
Clamping can be verified once vfs is transitioned to using time64_t.
Thanks, Deepa
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 9:44:33 AM CET Deepa Dinamani wrote:
I will post xfs tests that validate mount and range checking. I will keep the policy same as what the RFC suggests for now.
Clamping can be verified once vfs is transitioned to using time64_t.
Won't it already work as expected on 64-bit architectures as they have a 64-bit time_t?
Arnd
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de wrote:
On Sunday, November 6, 2016 9:44:33 AM CET Deepa Dinamani wrote:
I will post xfs tests that validate mount and range checking. I will keep the policy same as what the RFC suggests for now.
Clamping can be verified once vfs is transitioned to using time64_t.
Won't it already work as expected on 64-bit architectures as they have a 64-bit time_t?
Yes, on 64 bit architectures, it should work fine. 32 bit machines will have wrong clamped timestamps though for some filesystems.
I can post a test for clamping that only works on 64 bit machines.
Thanks, -Deepa
-
Arnd Bergmann -
Deepa Dinamani