CoreSight April 2025

coresight@lists.linaro.org

10 participants
55 discussions

Re: [bug report] coresight: Dynamically add connections

by James Clark

On 02/04/2025 12:00 pm, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hello James Clark, > > Commit 3d4ff657e454 ("coresight: Dynamically add connections") from > Apr 25, 2023 (linux-next), leads to the following Smatch static > checker warning: > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c:279 of_coresight_parse_endpoint() > warn: inconsistent refcounting 'rep->kobj.kref.refcount.refs.counter': > > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c > 196 static int of_coresight_parse_endpoint(struct device *dev, > 197 struct device_node *ep, > 198 struct coresight_platform_data *pdata) > 199 { > 200 int ret = 0; > 201 struct of_endpoint endpoint, rendpoint; > 202 struct device_node *rparent = NULL; > 203 struct device_node *rep = NULL; > 204 struct device *rdev = NULL; > 205 struct fwnode_handle *rdev_fwnode; > 206 struct coresight_connection conn = {}; > 207 struct coresight_connection *new_conn; > 208 > 209 do { > 210 /* Parse the local port details */ > 211 if (of_graph_parse_endpoint(ep, &endpoint)) > 212 break; > 213 /* > 214 * Get a handle on the remote endpoint and the device it is > 215 * attached to. > 216 */ > 217 rep = of_graph_get_remote_endpoint(ep); > 218 if (!rep) > 219 break; > 220 rparent = of_coresight_get_port_parent(rep); > 221 if (!rparent) > 222 break; > 223 if (of_graph_parse_endpoint(rep, &rendpoint)) > 224 break; > 225 > 226 rdev_fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(rparent); > 227 /* If the remote device is not available, defer probing */ > 228 rdev = coresight_find_device_by_fwnode(rdev_fwnode); > 229 if (!rdev) { > 230 ret = -EPROBE_DEFER; > 231 break; > 232 } > 233 > 234 conn.src_port = endpoint.port; > 235 /* > 236 * Hold the refcount to the target device. This could be > 237 * released via: > 238 * 1) coresight_release_platform_data() if the probe fails or > 239 * this device is unregistered. > 240 * 2) While removing the target device via > 241 * coresight_remove_match() > 242 */ > 243 conn.dest_fwnode = fwnode_handle_get(rdev_fwnode); > 244 conn.dest_port = rendpoint.port; > 245 > 246 /* > 247 * Get the firmware node of the filter source through the > 248 * reference. This could be used to filter the source in > 249 * building path. > 250 */ > 251 conn.filter_src_fwnode = > 252 fwnode_find_reference(&ep->fwnode, "filter-source", 0); > 253 if (IS_ERR(conn.filter_src_fwnode)) { > 254 conn.filter_src_fwnode = NULL; > 255 } else { > 256 conn.filter_src_dev = > 257 coresight_find_csdev_by_fwnode(conn.filter_src_fwnode); > 258 if (conn.filter_src_dev && > 259 !coresight_is_device_source(conn.filter_src_dev)) { > 260 dev_warn(dev, "port %d: Filter handle is not a trace source : %s\n", > 261 conn.src_port, dev_name(&conn.filter_src_dev->dev)); > 262 conn.filter_src_dev = NULL; > 263 conn.filter_src_fwnode = NULL; > 264 } > 265 } > 266 > 267 new_conn = coresight_add_out_conn(dev, pdata, &conn); > 268 if (IS_ERR_VALUE(new_conn)) { > 269 fwnode_handle_put(conn.dest_fwnode); > 270 return PTR_ERR(new_conn); > > Should this be a break statement instead of return statement? > Hi Dan, Yes it probably should, I'll send a patch. Thanks James

4 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] coresight: Consolidate clock enabling

by Leo Yan

Hi Jie, [ + Rob ] On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:55:51AM +0800, Jie Gan wrote: [...] > > > { > > > - struct clk *pclk = NULL; > > > + WARN_ON(!pclk); > > > if (!dev_is_amba(dev)) { > > > - pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb_pclk"); > > > - if (IS_ERR(pclk)) > > > - pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb"); > > > + *pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb_pclk"); > > > + if (IS_ERR(*pclk)) > > > + *pclk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "apb"); > > > + if (IS_ERR(*pclk)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(*pclk); > > > + } else { > > > + /* Don't enable pclk for an AMBA device */ > > > + *pclk = NULL; > > > > Now the "apb" clock won't be enabled for amba devices. I'm assuming > > that's fine if the clock was always called "apb_pclk" for them, but the > > commit that added the new clock name didn't specify any special casing > > either. > > > > Can we have a comment that says it's deliberate? But the more I think > > about it the more I'm confused why CTCU needed a different clock name to > > be defined, when all the other Coresight devices use "apb_pclk". > > Hi James, > > The original clock-name for CTCU is apb_pclk, but the dt-binding maintainer > request me to change it to apb, that's why the clock name is different from > others. > > I am not why we need apb instead of apb_pclk in dt-binding. Maybe some rules > have changed for dt-binding requirement. My conclusion is that if a device is an Arm Primecell peripheral, it should use the clock name "apb_pclk" (See the DT binding doc [1]). CTCU is not an Arm Primecell peripheral, so it does not need to strictly follow up the clock naming for Primecell peripheral. In Arm CoreSight framework, for code consistency, I would suggest using the clock naming "apb_pclk" for the APB clock for a newly added device that even it is not a Primecell peripheral. (We don't need to make any change to the CTCU driver, as we need to remain compatible with existed DTB blobs). Cc'ing Rob in case he has any suggestions. Thanks, Leo [1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/primecell.yaml

4 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH] coresight: fix the wrong type of the trace_id in coresight_path

by Mike Leach

Hi, On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 01:50, Jie Gan <quic_jiegan(a)quicinc.com> wrote: > > > > On 4/1/2025 5:56 PM, Mike Leach wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 07:11, Anshuman Khandual > > <anshuman.khandual(a)arm.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 4/1/25 07:12, Jie Gan wrote: > >>> The trace_id in coresight_path may contain an error number which means a > >>> negative integer, but the current type of the trace_id is u8. Change the > >>> type to int to fix it. > >>> > >>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter(a)linaro.org> > >>> Fixes: 3c03c49b2fa5 ("Coresight: Introduce a new struct coresight_path") > >>> Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <jie.gan(a)oss.qualcomm.com> > >> > >> LGTM > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual(a)arm.com> > >> > >>> --- > >>> include/linux/coresight.h | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h > >>> index d79a242b271d..c2bf10c43e7c 100644 > >>> --- a/include/linux/coresight.h > >>> +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h > >>> @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static struct coresight_dev_list (var) = { \ > >>> */ > >>> struct coresight_path { > >>> struct list_head path_list; > >>> - u8 trace_id; > >>> + int trace_id; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> enum cs_mode { > > > > There are many places in the Coresight drivers that assign a u8 > > traceid from the path trace ID. > > > > e.g. > > In coresight-etm4x-core.c : etm4_enable_perf() > > > > drvdata->trcid = path->trace_id; > > > > drvdata->trcid is defined as a u8 - the reason being trace IDs are > > 128 bits wide with some reserved values. > > > > Will this not just trigger the same issue if path->trace_id is changed > > to an int? Even if not it is inconsistent handling of the trace ID > > values. > > > > Trace ID errors should be handled by returning an invalid trace ID > > value - were the trace ID value will fail the macro > > IS_VALID_CS_TRACE_ID(), or separate the return of a trace ID from an > > error return in a function. > > > > Hi Mike, > > The path->trace_id is verified after it has been assigned with the logic > you mentioned: > > if (!IS_VALID_CS_TRACE_ID(path->trace_id)) > goto err_path; > > So it should be safe to assign to another u8 parameter, like you mentioned: > > In coresight-etm4x-core.c : etm4_enable_perf() > > drvdata->trcid = path->trace_id; > It is safe but will it not trigger a warning just like the one you are trying to fix as the types are mismatched? Mike > Thanks, > Jie > > > > Regards > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > -- > > Mike Leach > > Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd. > > Manchester Design Centre. UK > -- Mike Leach Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd. Manchester Design Centre. UK

4 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH] coresight: catu: Introduce refcount and spinlock for enabling/disabling

by James Clark

On 28/03/2025 10:38 pm, Yabin Cui wrote: > When tracing ETM data on multiple CPUs concurrently via the > perf interface, the CATU device is shared across different CPU > paths. This can lead to race conditions when multiple CPUs attempt > to enable or disable the CATU device simultaneously. > > To address these race conditions, this patch introduces the > following changes: > > 1. The enable and disable operations for the CATU device are not > reentrant. Therefore, a spinlock is added to ensure that only > one CPU can enable or disable a given CATU device at any point > in time. > > 2. A reference counter is used to manage the enable/disable state > of the CATU device. The device is enabled when the first CPU > requires it and is only disabled when the last CPU finishes > using it. This ensures the device remains active as long as at > least one CPU needs it. > > Signed-off-by: Yabin Cui <yabinc(a)google.com> > --- > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c | 29 ++++++++++++++------ > drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c > index 275cc0d9f505..834a7ffbbdbc 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.c > @@ -458,12 +458,19 @@ static int catu_enable_hw(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata, enum cs_mode cs_mode, > static int catu_enable(struct coresight_device *csdev, enum cs_mode mode, > void *data) > { > - int rc; > + int rc = 0; > + unsigned long flags; > struct catu_drvdata *catu_drvdata = csdev_to_catu_drvdata(csdev); > > - CS_UNLOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > - rc = catu_enable_hw(catu_drvdata, mode, data); > - CS_LOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&catu_drvdata->spinlock, flags); Hi Yabin, This needs to be a raw_spinlock since [1]. Also you might as well use the new guard() thing to save someone find-and-replacing it later. But I'm wondering if this is accurate. The ETR's refcount is dependent on the pid of the owner of the trace session: /* Do not proceed if this device is associated with another session */ if (drvdata->pid != -1 && drvdata->pid != pid) { rc = -EBUSY; goto unlock_out; } /* * No HW configuration is needed if the sink is already in * use for this session. */ if (drvdata->pid == pid) { csdev->refcnt++; goto unlock_out; } If the helpers get enabled first, could this mean that CATU gets associated with a different session than the ETR? Maybe not, but it would be easier to understand if the core code handled the refcounting and locking for linked devices. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250306121110.1647948-3-yeoreum.yun@arm.com/ Thanks James > + if (csdev->refcnt == 0) { > + CS_UNLOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > + rc = catu_enable_hw(catu_drvdata, mode, data); > + CS_LOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > + } > + if (!rc) > + csdev->refcnt++; > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&catu_drvdata->spinlock, flags); > return rc; > } > > @@ -486,12 +493,17 @@ static int catu_disable_hw(struct catu_drvdata *drvdata) > > static int catu_disable(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *__unused) > { > - int rc; > + int rc = 0; > + unsigned long flags; > struct catu_drvdata *catu_drvdata = csdev_to_catu_drvdata(csdev); > > - CS_UNLOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > - rc = catu_disable_hw(catu_drvdata); > - CS_LOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > + spin_lock_irqsave(&catu_drvdata->spinlock, flags); > + if (--csdev->refcnt == 0) { > + CS_UNLOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > + rc = catu_disable_hw(catu_drvdata); > + CS_LOCK(catu_drvdata->base); > + } > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&catu_drvdata->spinlock, flags); > return rc; > } > > @@ -550,6 +562,7 @@ static int __catu_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res) > dev->platform_data = pdata; > > drvdata->base = base; > + spin_lock_init(&drvdata->spinlock); > catu_desc.access = CSDEV_ACCESS_IOMEM(base); > catu_desc.pdata = pdata; > catu_desc.dev = dev; > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.h b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.h > index 141feac1c14b..663282ec6381 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.h > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.h > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct catu_drvdata { > void __iomem *base; > struct coresight_device *csdev; > int irq; > + spinlock_t spinlock; > }; > > #define CATU_REG32(name, offset) \

4 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PATCH] coresight: fix the wrong type of the trace_id in coresight_path

by Anshuman Khandual

On 4/1/25 07:12, Jie Gan wrote: > The trace_id in coresight_path may contain an error number which means a > negative integer, but the current type of the trace_id is u8. Change the > type to int to fix it. > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter(a)linaro.org> > Fixes: 3c03c49b2fa5 ("Coresight: Introduce a new struct coresight_path") > Signed-off-by: Jie Gan <jie.gan(a)oss.qualcomm.com> LGTM Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual(a)arm.com> > --- > include/linux/coresight.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/coresight.h b/include/linux/coresight.h > index d79a242b271d..c2bf10c43e7c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/coresight.h > +++ b/include/linux/coresight.h > @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static struct coresight_dev_list (var) = { \ > */ > struct coresight_path { > struct list_head path_list; > - u8 trace_id; > + int trace_id; > }; > > enum cs_mode {

4 months, 2 weeks

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

CoreSight April 2025