On 2025/4/25 4:30, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4/24/25 1:58 PM, Mao Jinlong wrote:
>> Add new coresight-qmi.yaml file describing the bindings required
>> to define qmi node in the device trees.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao(a)quicinc.com>
>> ---
>
> Is the service-id hardcoded/well-known? If so, we can drop
> this devicetree node and create a new platform device (& probe the
> related driver) based on the presence of qcom,qmi-id that you add
> in patch 3
>
> Konrad
service-id is not hardcoded. Different qmi connections will have
different service ids.
>
On Thu, 03 Jul 2025 13:35:33 -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Use the newly added of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource() function to
> handle "memory-region" properties.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] hwtracing: coresight: Use of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource() for "memory-region"
https://git.kernel.org/coresight/c/f0148bd7
Best regards,
--
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose(a)arm.com>
Ensure that etm_perf_add_symlink_sink() is only called for devices
that implement the alloc_buffer operation. This prevents invalid
symlink creation for dummy sinks that do not implement alloc_buffer.
Without this check, perf may attempt to use a dummy sink that lacks
alloc_buffer operationsu to initialise perf's ring buffer, leading
to runtime failures.
Fixes: 9d3ba0b6c0569 ("Coresight: Add coresight dummy driver")
Signed-off-by: Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang(a)quicinc.com>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
index fa758cc21827552a5c97b6bdd05d22dec4994b22..fddf04c5ee46eb4d559416296f7e85ce6c5689fa 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-core.c
@@ -1374,8 +1374,9 @@ struct coresight_device *coresight_register(struct coresight_desc *desc)
goto out_unlock;
}
- if (csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK ||
- csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINKSINK) {
+ if ((csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK ||
+ csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINKSINK) &&
+ sink_ops(csdev)->alloc_buffer) {
ret = etm_perf_add_symlink_sink(csdev);
if (ret) {
---
base-commit: 408c97c4a5e0b634dcd15bf8b8808b382e888164
change-id: 20250630-etm_perf_sink-ee0fcffc6820
Best regards,
--
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang(a)quicinc.com>
DEN0154 states that hardware will be allowed to ignore writes to TRB*
registers while the trace buffer is enabled. Add an ISB to ensure that
it's disabled before clearing the other registers.
This is purely defensive because it's expected that arm_trbe_disable()
would be called before teardown which has the required ISB.
Fixes: a2b579c41fe9 ("coresight: trbe: Remove redundant disable call")
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark(a)linaro.org>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
index 8267dd1a2130..10f3fb401edf 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static void trbe_drain_and_disable_local(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
static void trbe_reset_local(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
{
write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TRBLIMITR_EL1);
+ isb();
trbe_drain_buffer();
write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TRBPTR_EL1);
write_sysreg_s(0, SYS_TRBBASER_EL1);
---
base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494
change-id: 20250609-james-cs-trblimitr-isb-523f20d874d6
Best regards,
--
James Clark <james.clark(a)linaro.org>
This series refactors the way CPU IDs are retrieved from the device
tree.
Usually, there is a for loop that goes over every single CPU that can be
avoided. This also reduces the amount of NULL pointer checks in drivers.
I have abstracted away that loop and introduced a new function
(of_cpu_node_to_id) for this.
This patchset is a subset of [1], where I removed content and patches
relevant to hyper-threaded cores for DT. Based on the discussion, the
code refactor is still useful, hence this patchset.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250512080715.82-1-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com/
Alireza Sanaee (5):
of: add infra for finding CPU id from phandle
arch_topology: update CPU map to use the new API
coresight: cti: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU id
coresight: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU id
perf/arm-dsu: refactor cpu id retrieval via new API
of_cpu_phandle_to_id
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 12 ++++----
.../coresight/coresight-cti-platform.c | 15 ++--------
.../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 14 ++-------
drivers/of/cpu.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c | 6 ++--
include/linux/of.h | 9 ++++++
6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:05:10PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -445,13 +445,37 @@ static int etm4_enable_trace_unit(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> > etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, TRCRSR_TA, TRCRSR);
> >
> > etm4x_allow_trace(drvdata);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * According to software usage PKLXF in Arm ARM (ARM DDI 0487 L.a),
> > + * execute a Context synchronization event to guarantee the trace unit
> > + * will observe the new values of the System registers.
> > + */
> > + if (!csa->io_mem)
> > + isb();
> > +
>
> But, when write to SYS_TRFCR_EL1 in etm4x_allow_trace(), it already does
> isb(). Is it redundant?
Good point. It is not sufficient. As a system register writing in
kvm_tracing_set_el1_configuration(), this is why adds a ISB here.
Thanks,
Leo
Hi Levi,
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 12:10:17PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -579,6 +572,13 @@ static int etm4_enable_hw(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> >
> > if (!drvdata->paused)
> > rc = etm4_enable_trace_unit(drvdata);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * As recommended by section 4.3.7 (Synchronization of register updates)
> > + * of ARM IHI 0064H.b, the self-hosted trace analyzer always executes an
> > + * ISB instruction after programming the trace unit registers.
> > + */
> > + isb();
>
> But according to 4.3.7 ("Synchronization when using memory-mapped
> interface"), doesn't it need to dsb like:
>
> if (csa->iomem)
> dsb(sy);
> isb();
>
> Or am I missing something?
Section 4.3.7 suggests using a DSB barrier to ensure that writes have
completed in MMIO mode. It also mentions an alternative:
"If the memory is marked as Device-nGnRE or stronger, read back the
value of any register in the trace unit. This relies on the peripheral
coherence order defined in the Arm architecture."
In the etm4_{enable|disable}_trace_unit() functions, each time the
TRCPRGCTLR register is written, the driver polls bits in TRCSTATR.
This acts as synchronization using read-after-write (RAW), which is
exactly the approach suggested above.
This is why we don't need DSB() anymore.
Thanks,
Leo