On 23/06/2023 19:22, Tanmay Jagdale wrote:
The existing method of synthesizing instruction samples has the following issues:
- Non-branch instructions have mnemonics of branch instructions.
- Branch target address is missing.
Set the sample flags only when we reach the last instruction in the tidq (which would be a branch instruction) to solve issue 1).
To fix issue 2), start synthesizing the instructions from the previous packet (tidq->prev_packet) instead of current packet (tidq->packet). This way, it is easy to figure out the target address of the branch instruction in tidq->prev_packet which is the current packet's (tidq->packet) first executed instruction.
After the switch to processing the previous packet first, we no longer need to swap the packets during cs_etm__flush().
Hi Tanmay,
I think the fix for setting the right flags and instruction type makes sense, but is it possible to do it without the change to swapping in cs_etm__flush() or some of the other changes to cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample()?
I'm seeing some differences in the output related to the PID that's assigned to a sample and some of the addresses that aren't explained by the commit message. Also there is no corresponding change to cs_etm__synth_branch_sample(), which is also using prev_packet etc so I'm wondering if that's correct now without the swap? That function gets used with the default itrace options or itrace=b
For example if I run 'perf script --itrace=i100ns' and diff the output before and after your change I see a difference even though branch and instruction info isn't printed, so I wouldn't expect to see any changes. This is on a systemwide recording of a system under load.
Thanks James
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Jagdale tanmay@marvell.com
tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c index 91299cc56bf7..446e00d98fd5 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c @@ -1418,10 +1418,26 @@ static int cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, sample.stream_id = etmq->etm->instructions_id; sample.period = period; sample.cpu = tidq->packet->cpu;
- sample.flags = tidq->prev_packet->flags; sample.cpumode = event->sample.header.misc;
- cs_etm__copy_insn(etmq, tidq->trace_chan_id, tidq->packet, &sample);
- cs_etm__copy_insn(etmq, tidq->trace_chan_id, tidq->prev_packet, &sample);
- /* Populate branch target information only when we encounter
* branch instruction, which is at the end of tidq->prev_packet.
*/
- if (addr == (tidq->prev_packet->end_addr - 4)) {
/* Update the perf_sample flags using the prev_packet
* since that is the queue we are synthesizing.
*/
sample.flags = tidq->prev_packet->flags;
/* The last instruction of the previous queue would be a
* branch operation. Get the target of that branch by looking
* into the first executed instruction of the current packet
* queue.
*/
sample.addr = cs_etm__first_executed_instr(tidq->packet);
- }
if (etm->synth_opts.last_branch) sample.branch_stack = tidq->last_branch; @@ -1641,7 +1657,7 @@ static int cs_etm__sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, /* Get instructions remainder from previous packet */ instrs_prev = tidq->period_instructions;
- tidq->period_instructions += tidq->packet->instr_count;
- tidq->period_instructions += tidq->prev_packet->instr_count;
/* * Record a branch when the last instruction in @@ -1721,8 +1737,11 @@ static int cs_etm__sample(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, * been executed, but PC has not advanced to next * instruction) */
/* Get address from prev_packet since we are synthesizing
* that in cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample()
*/ addr = cs_etm__instr_addr(etmq, trace_chan_id,
tidq->packet, offset - 1);
tidq->prev_packet, offset - 1); ret = cs_etm__synth_instruction_sample( etmq, tidq, addr, etm->instructions_sample_period);
@@ -1786,7 +1805,7 @@ static int cs_etm__flush(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, /* Handle start tracing packet */ if (tidq->prev_packet->sample_type == CS_ETM_EMPTY)
goto swap_packet;
goto reset_last_br;
if (etmq->etm->synth_opts.last_branch && etmq->etm->synth_opts.instructions && @@ -1822,8 +1841,7 @@ static int cs_etm__flush(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq, return err; } -swap_packet:
- cs_etm__packet_swap(etm, tidq);
+reset_last_br: /* Reset last branches after flush the trace */ if (etm->synth_opts.last_branch)