Greetings,
I have send the patches as you requested(RFC), and also ran the *checkpath.pl http://checkpath.pl*. Every patch passed except a single WARNING, i added a new file (coresight-etm-api.c), and it seems that i needed to update the MAINTAINERS file, but in this case specifically there is no need to because the entire coresight directory is mentioned with a wildcard:
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/*
Thanks, Mike.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
wrote:
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 05:51, Mike Bazov mike@perception-point.io wrote:
Greetings,
I have attached 4 patches that implement the API i needed. I haven't
send it officially as a patch
to the mailing list, since this is a POC and merely a request for review
and "approval" of the approach
i have taken here. The patches are rebased on the latest TIP of
coresight tree "next" branch(correct to the
time of sending this message).
Thanks for working on this. Please resend using a cover-letter, "git send-email" and a clean run through checkpatch.pl. I would simply use the "RFC" tag instead of "PATCH" when submitting proof of concepts like that.
Mathieu