From: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org
commit 95c6fe970a0160cb770c5dce9f80311b42d030c0 upstream.
If packet processing wants to know the packet is bound with which ETM version, it needs to access metadata to decide that based on metadata magic number; but we cannot simply to use CPU logic ID number as index to access metadata sequential array, especially when system have hotplugged off CPUs, the metadata array are only allocated for online CPUs but not offline CPUs, so the CPU logic number doesn't match with its index in the array.
This patch is to change tuple from traceID-CPU# to traceID-metadata, thus it can use the tuple to retrieve metadata pointer according to traceID.
For safe accessing metadata fields, this patch provides helper function cs_etm__get_cpu() which is used to return CPU number according to traceID; cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet() is the first consumer for this helper function.
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com Cc: Mike Leach mike.leach@linaro.org Cc: Namhyung Kim namhyung@kernel.org Cc: Robert Walker robert.walker@arm.com Cc: Suzuki K Poulouse suzuki.poulose@arm.com Cc: coresight ml coresight@lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190129122842.32041-6-leo.yan@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com [Salvatore Bonaccorso: Adjust for context changes in tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c] Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso carnil@debian.org --- .../perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c | 8 +++--- tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 26 ++++++++++++++----- tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h | 9 ++++++- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c index 938def6d0bb9..f540037eb705 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c @@ -278,14 +278,12 @@ cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet(struct cs_etm_decoder *decoder, enum cs_etm_sample_type sample_type) { u32 et = 0; - struct int_node *inode = NULL; + int cpu;
if (decoder->packet_count >= MAX_BUFFER - 1) return OCSD_RESP_FATAL_SYS_ERR;
- /* Search the RB tree for the cpu associated with this traceID */ - inode = intlist__find(traceid_list, trace_chan_id); - if (!inode) + if (cs_etm__get_cpu(trace_chan_id, &cpu) < 0) return OCSD_RESP_FATAL_SYS_ERR;
et = decoder->tail; @@ -296,7 +294,7 @@ cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet(struct cs_etm_decoder *decoder, decoder->packet_buffer[et].sample_type = sample_type; decoder->packet_buffer[et].exc = false; decoder->packet_buffer[et].exc_ret = false; - decoder->packet_buffer[et].cpu = *((int *)inode->priv); + decoder->packet_buffer[et].cpu = cpu; decoder->packet_buffer[et].start_addr = CS_ETM_INVAL_ADDR; decoder->packet_buffer[et].end_addr = CS_ETM_INVAL_ADDR;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c index 7b5e15cc6b71..5cde3956e19a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c @@ -91,6 +91,20 @@ static int cs_etm__update_queues(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm); static int cs_etm__process_timeless_queues(struct cs_etm_auxtrace *etm, pid_t tid, u64 time_);
+int cs_etm__get_cpu(u8 trace_chan_id, int *cpu) +{ + struct int_node *inode; + u64 *metadata; + + inode = intlist__find(traceid_list, trace_chan_id); + if (!inode) + return -EINVAL; + + metadata = inode->priv; + *cpu = (int)metadata[CS_ETM_CPU]; + return 0; +} + static void cs_etm__packet_dump(const char *pkt_string) { const char *color = PERF_COLOR_BLUE; @@ -230,7 +244,7 @@ static void cs_etm__free(struct perf_session *session) cs_etm__free_events(session); session->auxtrace = NULL;
- /* First remove all traceID/CPU# nodes for the RB tree */ + /* First remove all traceID/metadata nodes for the RB tree */ intlist__for_each_entry_safe(inode, tmp, traceid_list) intlist__remove(traceid_list, inode); /* Then the RB tree itself */ @@ -1316,9 +1330,9 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, 0xffffffff);
/* - * Create an RB tree for traceID-CPU# tuple. Since the conversion has - * to be made for each packet that gets decoded, optimizing access in - * anything other than a sequential array is worth doing. + * Create an RB tree for traceID-metadata tuple. Since the conversion + * has to be made for each packet that gets decoded, optimizing access + * in anything other than a sequential array is worth doing. */ traceid_list = intlist__new(NULL); if (!traceid_list) { @@ -1384,8 +1398,8 @@ int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, err = -EINVAL; goto err_free_metadata; } - /* All good, associate the traceID with the CPU# */ - inode->priv = &metadata[j][CS_ETM_CPU]; + /* All good, associate the traceID with the metadata pointer */ + inode->priv = metadata[j]; }
/* diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h index 37f8d48179ca..fb5fc6538b7f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.h @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ enum { CS_ETMV4_PRIV_MAX, };
-/* RB tree for quick conversion between traceID and CPUs */ +/* RB tree for quick conversion between traceID and metadata pointers */ struct intlist *traceid_list;
#define KiB(x) ((x) * 1024) @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static const u64 __perf_cs_etmv4_magic = 0x4040404040404040ULL; #ifdef HAVE_CSTRACE_SUPPORT int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event, struct perf_session *session); +int cs_etm__get_cpu(u8 trace_chan_id, int *cpu); #else static inline int cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event __maybe_unused, @@ -76,6 +77,12 @@ cs_etm__process_auxtrace_info(union perf_event *event __maybe_unused, { return -1; } + +static inline int cs_etm__get_cpu(u8 trace_chan_id __maybe_unused, + int *cpu __maybe_unused) +{ + return -1; +} #endif
#endif
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:12:14PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
From: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org
commit 95c6fe970a0160cb770c5dce9f80311b42d030c0 upstream.
If packet processing wants to know the packet is bound with which ETM version, it needs to access metadata to decide that based on metadata magic number; but we cannot simply to use CPU logic ID number as index to access metadata sequential array, especially when system have hotplugged off CPUs, the metadata array are only allocated for online CPUs but not offline CPUs, so the CPU logic number doesn't match with its index in the array.
This patch is to change tuple from traceID-CPU# to traceID-metadata, thus it can use the tuple to retrieve metadata pointer according to traceID.
For safe accessing metadata fields, this patch provides helper function cs_etm__get_cpu() which is used to return CPU number according to traceID; cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet() is the first consumer for this helper function.
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier mathieu.poirier@linaro.org Cc: Alexander Shishkin alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com Cc: Mike Leach mike.leach@linaro.org Cc: Namhyung Kim namhyung@kernel.org Cc: Robert Walker robert.walker@arm.com Cc: Suzuki K Poulouse suzuki.poulose@arm.com Cc: coresight ml coresight@lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190129122842.32041-6-leo.yan@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com [Salvatore Bonaccorso: Adjust for context changes in tools/perf/util/cs-etm-decoder/cs-etm-decoder.c] Signed-off-by: Salvatore Bonaccorso carnil@debian.org
That's a fallout on my end. Should have said: This is for 4.19 specifically to be queued.
Background: in https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20201014135627.GA3698844@kroah.com/ 168200b6d6ea0cb5765943ec5da5b8149701f36a was queued up for v4.19.y but the prerequeisite commit was not included and so resulted in build failures with gcc 8.3.0.
The commit was later on reverted but in this thread it was asked to actually make it possible to compile the file as well with more recent gcc versions.
Those two patches to be applied in 4.19.y only pick up a backport of the rerequisite commit 95c6fe970a0160cb770c5dce9f80311b42d030c0 (PATCH 1) followed up by the cherry-pick of 168200b6d6ea0cb5765943ec5da5b8149701f36a again.
Regards, Salvatore
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:23:23PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:12:14PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
From: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org
commit 95c6fe970a0160cb770c5dce9f80311b42d030c0 upstream.
[...]
That's a fallout on my end. Should have said: This is for 4.19 specifically to be queued.
Background: in https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20201014135627.GA3698844@kroah.com/ 168200b6d6ea0cb5765943ec5da5b8149701f36a was queued up for v4.19.y but the prerequeisite commit was not included and so resulted in build failures with gcc 8.3.0.
The commit was later on reverted but in this thread it was asked to actually make it possible to compile the file as well with more recent gcc versions.
Those two patches to be applied in 4.19.y only pick up a backport of the rerequisite commit 95c6fe970a0160cb770c5dce9f80311b42d030c0 (PATCH
- followed up by the cherry-pick of
168200b6d6ea0cb5765943ec5da5b8149701f36a again.
Since the patch 01 is minor tweaked due to context difference, I manually compared it with original patch and looks good to me.
Thank you for the back porting, Leo
Hi Leo,
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:35:22AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:23:23PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:12:14PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
From: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org
commit 95c6fe970a0160cb770c5dce9f80311b42d030c0 upstream.
[...]
That's a fallout on my end. Should have said: This is for 4.19 specifically to be queued.
Background: in https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20201014135627.GA3698844@kroah.com/ 168200b6d6ea0cb5765943ec5da5b8149701f36a was queued up for v4.19.y but the prerequeisite commit was not included and so resulted in build failures with gcc 8.3.0.
The commit was later on reverted but in this thread it was asked to actually make it possible to compile the file as well with more recent gcc versions.
Those two patches to be applied in 4.19.y only pick up a backport of the rerequisite commit 95c6fe970a0160cb770c5dce9f80311b42d030c0 (PATCH
- followed up by the cherry-pick of
168200b6d6ea0cb5765943ec5da5b8149701f36a again.
Since the patch 01 is minor tweaked due to context difference, I manually compared it with original patch and looks good to me.
Thank you for the back porting,
Welcome, given I'm unfamiliar with the codebasis for perf the explicit acknowledgement nothing looks wrong was appreciated.
Regards, Salvatore