On 2024/12/11 16:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 08:22:51PM +0800, Mao Jinlong wrote:
With current design, the name of the non-cpu bounded coresight component is the device type with the number. And with 'ls' command we can get the register address of the component. But from these information, we can't know what the HW or system the component belongs to. Add label in DT and show the hw information by reading label sysfs node.
cti_sys0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/138f0000.cti/cti_sys0 cti_sys1 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/13900000.cti/cti_sys1 tpdm0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/10b0d000.tpdm/tpdm0 tpdm1 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/10c28000.tpdm/tpdm1 tpdm2 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/10c29000.tpdm/tpdm2
/sys/bus/coresight/devices # cat cti*/label cti_dlct_0 cti_dlct_1 cti_apss_0 cti_apss_1 cti_apss_2
Change since V4:
- Add label in DT and add label sysfs node for each coresight device.
This is v5, no links to previous versions (I really suggest to start using b4 if you want to make your process easier for you), no other changes so subject is obviously the same and looking for this patchset previous versions gives me 0 results:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22coresight%3A+Add+label+sysfs+node+support%...
OK, let's try b4 diff:
b4 diff '20241210122253.31926-1-quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com' Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20241210122253.31926-1-quic_jinlmao@quicinc.com/t.mbox.gz Checking for older revisions Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org Nothing matching that query.
Analyzing 3 messages in the thread Could not find lower series to compare against.
So how do you expect us to do any meaningful review?
Best regards, Krzysztof
I will resend the patches with the links of lower series.
-
Jinlong Mao