Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

8 participants
2915 discussions

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Daniel Vetter

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:23 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:02:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > dma_fence only possibly makes some sense if you intend to expose the > > > completion outside a single driver. > > > > > > The prefered kernel design pattern for this is to connect things with > > > a function callback. > > > > > > So the actual use case of dma_fence is quite narrow and tightly linked > > > to DRM. > > > > > > I don't think we should spread this beyond DRM, I can't see a reason. > > > > Yeah v4l has a legit reason to use dma_fence, android wants that > > there. > > 'legit' in the sense the v4l is supposed to trigger stuff in DRM when > V4L DMA completes? I would still see that as part of DRM Yes, and also the other way around. But thus far it didn't land. -Daniel > Or is it building a parallel DRM like DMA completion graph? > > > > Trying to improve performance of limited HW by using sketchy > > > techniques at the cost of general system stability should be a NAK. > > > > Well that's pretty much gpu drivers, all the horrors for a bit more speed :-) > > > > On the text itself, should I upgrade to "must not" instead of "should > > not"? Or more needed? > > Fundamentally having some unknowable graph of dependencies where parts > of the graph can be placed in critical regions like notifiers is a > complete maintenance nightmare. > > I think building systems like this should be discouraged :\ -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

4 years, 11 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Daniel Vetter

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:48 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)mellanox.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:01:10PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > Am 10.07.20 um 14:54 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:48:16PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > > > > Am 10.07.20 um 14:43 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > > > > > > > > > Below the paragraph I've added after our discussions around dma-fences > > > > > > outside of drivers/gpu. Good enough for an ack on this, or want something > > > > > > changed? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Daniel > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring > > > > > > > + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to > > > > > > > + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of > > > > > > > + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. > > > > > I was hoping we'd get to 'no driver outside GPU should even use > > > > > dma_fence()' > > > > My last status was that V4L could come use dma_fences as well. > > > I'm sure lots of places *could* use it, but I think I understood that > > > it is a bad idea unless you have to fit into the DRM uAPI? > > > > It would be a bit questionable if you use the container objects we came up > > with in the DRM subsystem outside of it. > > > > But using the dma_fence itself makes sense for everything which could do > > async DMA in general. > > dma_fence only possibly makes some sense if you intend to expose the > completion outside a single driver. > > The prefered kernel design pattern for this is to connect things with > a function callback. > > So the actual use case of dma_fence is quite narrow and tightly linked > to DRM. > > I don't think we should spread this beyond DRM, I can't see a reason. Yeah v4l has a legit reason to use dma_fence, android wants that there. There's even been patches proposed years ago, but never landed because android is using some vendor hack horror show for camera drivers right now. But there is an effort going on to fix that (under the libcamera heading), and I expect that once we have that, it'll want dma_fence support. So outright excluding everyone from dma_fence is a bit too much. They definitely shouldn't be used though for entirely independent stuff. > > > You are better to do something contained in the single driver where > > > locking can be analyzed. > > > > > > > I'm not 100% sure, but wouldn't MMU notifier + dma_fence be a valid use case > > > > for things like custom FPGA interfaces as well? > > > I don't think we should expand the list of drivers that use this > > > technique. > > > Drivers that can't suspend should pin memory, not use blocked > > > notifiers to created pinned memory. > > > > Agreed totally, it's a complete pain to maintain even for the GPU drivers. > > > > Unfortunately that doesn't change users from requesting it. So I'm pretty > > sure we are going to see more of this. > > Kernel maintainers need to say no. > > The proper way to do DMA on no-faulting hardware is page pinning. > > Trying to improve performance of limited HW by using sketchy > techniques at the cost of general system stability should be a NAK. Well that's pretty much gpu drivers, all the horrors for a bit more speed :-) On the text itself, should I upgrade to "must not" instead of "should not"? Or more needed? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch

4 years, 11 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Christian König

Am 10.07.20 um 14:54 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:48:16PM +0200, Christian König wrote: >> Am 10.07.20 um 14:43 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: >>> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> Below the paragraph I've added after our discussions around dma-fences >>>> outside of drivers/gpu. Good enough for an ack on this, or want something >>>> changed? >>>> >>>> Thanks, Daniel >>>> >>>>> + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring >>>>> + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to >>>>> + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of >>>>> + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. >>> I was hoping we'd get to 'no driver outside GPU should even use >>> dma_fence()' >> My last status was that V4L could come use dma_fences as well. > I'm sure lots of places *could* use it, but I think I understood that > it is a bad idea unless you have to fit into the DRM uAPI? It would be a bit questionable if you use the container objects we came up with in the DRM subsystem outside of it. But using the dma_fence itself makes sense for everything which could do async DMA in general. > You are better to do something contained in the single driver where > locking can be analyzed. > >> I'm not 100% sure, but wouldn't MMU notifier + dma_fence be a valid use case >> for things like custom FPGA interfaces as well? > I don't think we should expand the list of drivers that use this > technique. > Drivers that can't suspend should pin memory, not use blocked > notifiers to created pinned memory. Agreed totally, it's a complete pain to maintain even for the GPU drivers. Unfortunately that doesn't change users from requesting it. So I'm pretty sure we are going to see more of this. Christian. > > Jason

4 years, 11 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Christian König

Am 10.07.20 um 14:43 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> Below the paragraph I've added after our discussions around dma-fences >> outside of drivers/gpu. Good enough for an ack on this, or want something >> changed? >> >> Thanks, Daniel >> >>> + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring >>> + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to >>> + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of >>> + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. > I was hoping we'd get to 'no driver outside GPU should even use > dma_fence()' My last status was that V4L could come use dma_fences as well. I'm not 100% sure, but wouldn't MMU notifier + dma_fence be a valid use case for things like custom FPGA interfaces as well? > Is that not reasonable? > > When your annotations once anything uses dma_fence it has to assume > the worst cases, right? Well a defensive approach is usually the best idea, yes. Christian. > > Jason

4 years, 11 months

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] staging: android: ion: Skip sync if not mapped

by John Stultz

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:22 AM Christian Brauner <christian.brauner(a)ubuntu.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:25:08PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 09:41:31PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > But I do think we can mark it as deprecated and let folks know that > > > around the end of the year it will be deleted. > > > > No one ever notices "depreciated" things, they only notice if the code > > is no longer there :) > > > > So I'm all for just deleting it and seeing who even notices... > > Agreed. I mean, I get there's not much love for ION in staging, and I too am eager to see it go, but I also feel like in the discussions around submitting the dmabuf heaps at talks, etc, that there was clear value in removing ION after a short time so that folks could transition being able to test both implementations against the same kernel so performance regressions, etc could be worked out. I am actively getting many requests for help for vendors who are looking at dmabuf heaps and are starting the transition process, and I'm trying my best to motivate them to directly work within the community so their needed heap functionality can go upstream. But it's going to be a process, and their first attempts aren't going to magically land upstream. I think being able to really compare their implementations as they iterate and push things upstream will help in order to be able to have upstream solutions that are also properly functional for production usage. The dmabuf heaps have been in an official kernel now for all of three weeks. So yea, we can "delete [ION] and see who even notices", but I worry that may seem a bit like contempt for the folks doing the work on transitioning over, which doesn't help getting them to participate within the community. thanks -john

4 years, 11 months

[PATCH 02/25] dma-fence: prime lockdep annotations

by Daniel Vetter

Two in one go: - it is allowed to call dma_fence_wait() while holding a dma_resv_lock(). This is fundamental to how eviction works with ttm, so required. - it is allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from memory reclaim contexts, specifically from shrinker callbacks (which i915 does), and from mmu notifier callbacks (which amdgpu does, and which i915 sometimes also does, and probably always should, but that's kinda a debate). Also for stuff like HMM we really need to be able to do this, or things get real dicey. Consequence is that any critical path necessary to get to a dma_fence_signal for a fence must never a) call dma_resv_lock nor b) allocate memory with GFP_KERNEL. Also by implication of dma_resv_lock(), no userspace faulting allowed. That's some supremely obnoxious limitations, which is why we need to sprinkle the right annotations to all relevant paths. The one big locking context we're leaving out here is mmu notifiers, added in commit 23b68395c7c78a764e8963fc15a7cfd318bf187f Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)ffwll.ch> Date: Mon Aug 26 22:14:21 2019 +0200 mm/mmu_notifiers: add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start/end that one covers a lot of other callsites, and it's also allowed to wait on dma-fences from mmu notifiers. But there's no ready-made functions exposed to prime this, so I've left it out for now. v2: Also track against mmu notifier context. v3: kerneldoc to spec the cross-driver contract. Note that currently i915 throws in a hard-coded 10s timeout on foreign fences (not sure why that was done, but it's there), which is why that rule is worded with SHOULD instead of MUST. Also some of the mmu_notifier/shrinker rules might surprise SoC drivers, I haven't fully audited them all. Which is infeasible anyway, we'll need to run them with lockdep and dma-fence annotations and see what goes boom. v4: A spelling fix from Mika v5: #ifdef for CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER. Reported by 0day. Unfortunately this means lockdep enforcement is slightly inconsistent, it won't spot GFP_NOIO and GFP_NOFS allocations in the wrong spot if CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER is disabled in the kernel config. Oh well. v5: Note that only drivers/gpu has a reasonable (or at least historical) excuse to use dma_fence_wait() from shrinker and mmu notifier callbacks. Everyone else should either have a better memory manager model, or better hardware. This reflects discussions with Jason Gunthorpe. Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg(a)mellanox.com> Cc: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling(a)amd.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom(a)intel.com> (v4) Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala(a)intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas.hellstrom(a)intel.com> Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> --- Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst | 6 ++++ drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c | 8 +++++ include/linux/dma-fence.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 61 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst index 05d856131140..f8f6decde359 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/dma-buf.rst @@ -133,6 +133,12 @@ DMA Fences .. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c :doc: DMA fences overview +DMA Fence Cross-Driver Contract +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c + :doc: fence cross-driver contract + DMA Fence Signalling Annotations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c index 0005bc002529..af1d8ea926b3 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -64,6 +64,52 @@ static atomic64_t dma_fence_context_counter = ATOMIC64_INIT(1); * &dma_buf.resv pointer. */ +/** + * DOC: fence cross-driver contract + * + * Since &dma_fence provide a cross driver contract, all drivers must follow the + * same rules: + * + * * Fences must complete in a reasonable time. Fences which represent kernels + * and shaders submitted by userspace, which could run forever, must be backed + * up by timeout and gpu hang recovery code. Minimally that code must prevent + * further command submission and force complete all in-flight fences, e.g. + * when the driver or hardware do not support gpu reset, or if the gpu reset + * failed for some reason. Ideally the driver supports gpu recovery which only + * affects the offending userspace context, and no other userspace + * submissions. + * + * * Drivers may have different ideas of what completion within a reasonable + * time means. Some hang recovery code uses a fixed timeout, others a mix + * between observing forward progress and increasingly strict timeouts. + * Drivers should not try to second guess timeout handling of fences from + * other drivers. + * + * * To ensure there's no deadlocks of dma_fence_wait() against other locks + * drivers should annotate all code required to reach dma_fence_signal(), + * which completes the fences, with dma_fence_begin_signalling() and + * dma_fence_end_signalling(). + * + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() while holding dma_resv_lock(). + * This means any code required for fence completion cannot acquire a + * &dma_resv lock. Note that this also pulls in the entire established + * locking hierarchy around dma_resv_lock() and dma_resv_unlock(). + * + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from their &shrinker + * callbacks. This means any code required for fence completion cannot + * allocate memory with GFP_KERNEL. + * + * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from their &mmu_notifier + * respectively &mmu_interval_notifier callbacks. This means any code required + * for fence completeion cannot allocate memory with GFP_NOFS or GFP_NOIO. + * Only GFP_ATOMIC is permissible, which might fail. + * + * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring + * &mmu_interval_notifier and &shrinker callbacks at the same time as having to + * track asynchronous compute work using &dma_fence. No driver outside of + * drivers/gpu should ever call dma_fence_wait() in such contexts. + */ + static const char *dma_fence_stub_get_name(struct dma_fence *fence) { return "stub"; diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c index e7d7197d48ce..0e6675ec1d11 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/sched/mm.h> +#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h> /** * DOC: Reservation Object Overview @@ -116,6 +117,13 @@ static int __init dma_resv_lockdep(void) if (ret == -EDEADLK) dma_resv_lock_slow(&obj, &ctx); fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL); +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER + lock_map_acquire(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); + __dma_fence_might_wait(); + lock_map_release(&__mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start_map); +#else + __dma_fence_might_wait(); +#endif fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL); ww_mutex_unlock(&obj.lock); ww_acquire_fini(&ctx); diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h index 3f288f7db2ef..09e23adb351d 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(struct dma_fence __rcu **fencep) #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void); void dma_fence_end_signalling(bool cookie); +void __dma_fence_might_wait(void); #else static inline bool dma_fence_begin_signalling(void) { -- 2.27.0

4 years, 12 months

[PATCH 25/25] drm/amdgpu: gpu recovery does full modesets

by Daniel Vetter

... I think it's time to stop this little exercise. The lockdep splat, for the record: [ 132.583381] ====================================================== [ 132.584091] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 132.584775] 5.7.0-rc3+ #346 Tainted: G W [ 132.585461] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 132.586184] kworker/2:3/865 is trying to acquire lock: [ 132.586857] ffffc90000677c70 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.587569] but task is already holding lock: [ 132.589044] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.589803] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 132.592009] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 132.593507] -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: [ 132.595019] dma_fence_begin_signalling+0x50/0x60 [ 132.595767] drm_atomic_helper_commit+0xa1/0x180 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.596567] drm_client_modeset_commit_atomic+0x1ea/0x250 [drm] [ 132.597420] drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x55/0x190 [drm] [ 132.598178] drm_client_modeset_commit+0x24/0x40 [drm] [ 132.598948] drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x4b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.599738] drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x30/0x40 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.600539] fbcon_init+0x2e8/0x660 [ 132.601344] visual_init+0xce/0x130 [ 132.602156] do_bind_con_driver+0x1bc/0x2b0 [ 132.602970] do_take_over_console+0x115/0x180 [ 132.603763] do_fbcon_takeover+0x58/0xb0 [ 132.604564] register_framebuffer+0x1ee/0x300 [ 132.605369] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36e/0x520 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.606187] amdgpu_fbdev_init+0xb3/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ 132.607032] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xe90/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.607862] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.608697] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.609511] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.610324] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.611130] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.611939] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.612766] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.613593] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.614419] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.615249] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.616071] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.616902] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.617731] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.618560] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.619391] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.620228] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.621064] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.621903] -> #1 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 132.623587] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xcc/0x10c0 [ 132.624448] ww_mutex_lock+0x43/0xb0 [ 132.625315] drm_modeset_lock+0x44/0x120 [drm] [ 132.626184] drmm_mode_config_init+0x2db/0x8b0 [drm] [ 132.627098] amdgpu_device_init.cold+0xbd1/0x1677 [amdgpu] [ 132.628007] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x5a/0x200 [amdgpu] [ 132.628920] amdgpu_pci_probe+0xf7/0x180 [amdgpu] [ 132.629804] local_pci_probe+0x42/0x80 [ 132.630690] pci_device_probe+0x104/0x1a0 [ 132.631583] really_probe+0x147/0x3c0 [ 132.632479] driver_probe_device+0xb6/0x100 [ 132.633379] device_driver_attach+0x53/0x60 [ 132.634275] __driver_attach+0x8c/0x150 [ 132.635170] bus_for_each_dev+0x7b/0xc0 [ 132.636069] bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x1f0 [ 132.636974] driver_register+0x6c/0xc0 [ 132.637870] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 132.638765] do_init_module+0x5c/0x230 [ 132.639654] load_module+0x2981/0x2bc0 [ 132.640522] __do_sys_finit_module+0xaa/0x110 [ 132.641372] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x250 [ 132.642203] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 [ 132.643022] -> #0 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 132.644643] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.645469] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.646274] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.647071] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.647902] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.648698] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.649498] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.650300] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.651084] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.651825] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.652594] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.653402] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.654139] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.654868] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 132.655598] other info that might help us debug this: [ 132.657739] Chain exists of: crtc_ww_class_acquire --> crtc_ww_class_mutex --> dma_fence_map [ 132.659877] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 132.661416] CPU0 CPU1 [ 132.662126] ---- ---- [ 132.662847] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.663574] lock(crtc_ww_class_mutex); [ 132.664319] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 132.665063] lock(crtc_ww_class_acquire); [ 132.665799] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 132.667965] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/865: [ 132.668701] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.669462] #1: ffffc90000677e58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 132.670242] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.671039] #3: ffff8887b84a1748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x59e/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.671902] stack backtrace: [ 132.673515] CPU: 2 PID: 865 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ #346 [ 132.674347] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018 [ 132.675194] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched] [ 132.676046] Call Trace: [ 132.676897] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0 [ 132.677748] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 [ 132.678604] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 132.679459] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 132.680311] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 132.681163] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.682021] ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20 [ 132.682880] ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x14/0x40 [ 132.683737] ? __module_address+0x28/0xf0 [ 132.684601] drm_modeset_acquire_init+0xd2/0x100 [drm] [ 132.685466] ? drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.686335] drm_atomic_helper_suspend+0x38/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] [ 132.687255] dm_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.688152] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x83/0xe0 [amdgpu] [ 132.689057] ? amdgpu_fence_process+0x4c/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.689963] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x1c/0x60 [amdgpu] [ 132.690893] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x4e6/0xe64 [amdgpu] [ 132.691818] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 132.692707] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 132.693597] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 132.694487] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 132.695373] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 132.696264] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 132.697154] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 132.698057] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c index 44b321eecc3d..910c86f577b2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c @@ -2477,6 +2477,14 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1(struct amdgpu_device *adev) /* displays are handled separately */ if (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->type == AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_DCE) { /* XXX handle errors */ + + /* + * This is dm_suspend, which calls modeset locks, and + * that a pretty good inversion against dma_fence_signal + * which gpu recovery is supposed to guarantee. + * + * Dont ask me how to fix this. + */ r = adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->suspend(adev); /* XXX handle errors */ if (r) { -- 2.27.0

4 years, 12 months

[PATCH 24/25] Revert "drm/amdgpu: add fbdev suspend/resume on gpu reset"

by Daniel Vetter

This is one from the department of "maybe play lottery if you hit this, karma compensation might work". Or at least lockdep ftw! This reverts commit 565d1941557756a584ac357d945bc374d5fcd1d0. It's not quite as low-risk as the commit message claims, because this grabs console_lock, which might be held when we allocate memory, which might never happen because the dma_fence_wait() is stuck waiting on our gpu reset: [ 136.763714] ====================================================== [ 136.763714] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 136.763715] 5.7.0-rc3+ #346 Tainted: G W [ 136.763716] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 136.763716] kworker/2:3/682 is trying to acquire lock: [ 136.763716] ffffffff8226f140 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763723] but task is already holding lock: [ 136.763724] ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763726] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 136.763726] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 136.763727] -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: [ 136.763730] __dma_fence_might_wait+0x41/0xb0 [ 136.763732] dma_resv_lockdep+0x171/0x202 [ 136.763734] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 136.763736] kernel_init_freeable+0x20d/0x26d [ 136.763738] kernel_init+0xa/0xfb [ 136.763740] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763740] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 136.763743] fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 [ 136.763745] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x6e0 [ 136.763747] device_create_groups_vargs+0x52/0xf0 [ 136.763747] device_create+0x49/0x60 [ 136.763749] fb_console_init+0x25/0x145 [ 136.763750] fbmem_init+0xcc/0xe2 [ 136.763750] do_one_initcall+0x5d/0x2f0 [ 136.763751] kernel_init_freeable+0x20d/0x26d [ 136.763752] kernel_init+0xa/0xfb [ 136.763753] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763753] -> #0 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 136.763755] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 136.763756] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 136.763757] console_lock+0x47/0x70 [ 136.763761] drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763809] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x21e/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.763850] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 136.763851] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763852] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 136.763853] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 136.763854] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 136.763855] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 [ 136.763855] other info that might help us debug this: [ 136.763856] Chain exists of: console_lock --> fs_reclaim --> dma_fence_map [ 136.763857] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 136.763857] CPU0 CPU1 [ 136.763857] ---- ---- [ 136.763857] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 136.763858] lock(fs_reclaim); [ 136.763858] lock(dma_fence_map); [ 136.763858] lock(console_lock); [ 136.763859] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 136.763860] 4 locks held by kworker/2:3/682: [ 136.763860] #0: ffff8887fb81c938 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 136.763862] #1: ffffc90000cafe58 ((work_completion)(&(&sched->work_tdr)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1bc/0x580 [ 136.763863] #2: ffffffff82318c80 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: drm_sched_job_timedout+0x25/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.763865] #3: ffff8887ab621748 (&adev->lock_reset){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x5ab/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.763914] stack backtrace: [ 136.763915] CPU: 2 PID: 682 Comm: kworker/2:3 Tainted: G W 5.7.0-rc3+ #346 [ 136.763916] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME X370-PRO, BIOS 4011 04/19/2018 [ 136.763918] Workqueue: events drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched] [ 136.763919] Call Trace: [ 136.763922] dump_stack+0x8f/0xd0 [ 136.763924] check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 [ 136.763926] __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x23f0 [ 136.763927] lock_acquire+0xad/0x370 [ 136.763932] ? drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763933] ? mark_held_locks+0x2d/0x80 [ 136.763934] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 [ 136.763936] console_lock+0x47/0x70 [ 136.763940] ? drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763944] drm_fb_helper_set_suspend_unlocked+0x7b/0xa0 [drm_kms_helper] [ 136.763993] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x21e/0xe7b [amdgpu] [ 136.764036] amdgpu_job_timedout+0xfb/0x150 [amdgpu] [ 136.764038] drm_sched_job_timedout+0x8a/0xf0 [gpu_sched] [ 136.764040] process_one_work+0x23c/0x580 [ 136.764041] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 136.764042] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 136.764044] kthread+0x12e/0x150 [ 136.764045] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [ 136.764046] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c index 3a3bccd7f1c7..44b321eecc3d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c @@ -4109,8 +4109,6 @@ static int amdgpu_do_asic_reset(struct amdgpu_hive_info *hive, if (r) goto out; - amdgpu_fbdev_set_suspend(tmp_adev, 0); - /* must succeed. */ amdgpu_ras_resume(tmp_adev); @@ -4351,8 +4349,6 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev, */ amdgpu_unregister_gpu_instance(tmp_adev); - amdgpu_fbdev_set_suspend(tmp_adev, 1); - /* disable ras on ALL IPs */ if (!(in_ras_intr && !use_baco) && amdgpu_device_ip_need_full_reset(tmp_adev)) -- 2.27.0

4 years, 12 months

[PATCH 23/25] drm/amdgpu: use dma-fence annotations for gpu reset code

by Daniel Vetter

To improve coverage also annotate the gpu reset code itself, since that's called from other places than drm/scheduler (which is already annotated). Annotations nests, so this doesn't break anything, and allows easier testing. Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)ffwll.ch> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c index a649e40fd96f..3a3bccd7f1c7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c @@ -4261,6 +4261,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev, (amdgpu_asic_reset_method(adev) == AMD_RESET_METHOD_BACO) ? true : false; bool audio_suspended = false; + bool fence_cookie; + + fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling(); /* * Flush RAM to disk so that after reboot @@ -4289,6 +4292,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev, DRM_INFO("Bailing on TDR for s_job:%llx, hive: %llx as another already in progress", job ? job->base.id : -1, hive->hive_id); mutex_unlock(&hive->hive_lock); + dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie); return 0; } @@ -4299,8 +4303,10 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev, */ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&device_list); if (adev->gmc.xgmi.num_physical_nodes > 1) { - if (!hive) + if (!hive) { + dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie); return -ENODEV; + } if (!list_is_first(&adev->gmc.xgmi.head, &hive->device_list)) list_rotate_to_front(&adev->gmc.xgmi.head, &hive->device_list); device_list_handle = &hive->device_list; @@ -4315,6 +4321,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev, DRM_INFO("Bailing on TDR for s_job:%llx, as another already in progress", job ? job->base.id : -1); mutex_unlock(&hive->hive_lock); + dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie); return 0; } @@ -4455,6 +4462,7 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct amdgpu_device *adev, if (r) dev_info(adev->dev, "GPU reset end with ret = %d\n", r); + dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie); return r; } -- 2.27.0

4 years, 12 months

[PATCH 22/25] drm/scheduler: use dma-fence annotations in tdr work

by Daniel Vetter

In the face of unpriviledged userspace being able to submit bogus gpu workloads the kernel needs gpu timeout and reset (tdr) to guarantee that dma_fences actually complete. Annotate this worker to make sure we don't have any accidental locking inversions or other problems lurking. Originally this was part of the overall scheduler annotation patch. But amdgpu has some glorious inversions here: - grabs console_lock - does a full modeset, which grabs all kinds of locks (drm_modeset_lock, dma_resv_lock) which can deadlock with dma_fence_wait held inside them. - almost minor at that point, but the modeset code also allocates memory These all look like they'll be very hard to fix properly, the hardware seems to require a full display reset with any gpu recovery. Hence split out as a seperate patch. Since amdgpu isn't the only hardware driver that needs to reset the display (at least gen2/3 on intel have the same problem) we need a generic solution for this. There's two tricks we could still from drm/i915 and lift to dma-fence: - The big whack, aka force-complete all fences. i915 does this for all pending jobs if the reset is somehow stuck. Trouble is we'd need to do this for all fences in the entire system, and just the book-keeping for that will be fun. Plus lots of drivers use fences for all kinds of internal stuff like memory management, so unconditionally resetting all of them doesn't work. I'm also hoping that with these fence annotations we could enlist lockdep in finding the last offenders causing deadlocks, and we could remove this get-out-of-jail trick. - The more feasible approach (across drivers at least as part of the dma_fence contract) is what drm/i915 does for gen2/3: When we need to reset the display we wake up all dma_fence_wait_interruptible calls, or well at least the equivalent of those in i915 internally. Relying on ioctl restart we force all other threads to release their locks, which means the tdr thread is guaranteed to be able to get them. I think we could implement this at the dma_fence level, including proper lockdep annotations. dma_fence_begin_tdr(): - must be nested within a dma_fence_begin/end_signalling section - will wake up all interruptible (but not the non-interruptible) dma_fence_wait() calls and force them to complete with a -ERESTARTSYS errno code. All new interrupitble calls to dma_fence_wait() will immeidately fail with the same error code. dma_fence_end_trdr(): - this will convert dma_fence_wait() calls back to normal. Of course interrupting dma_fence_wait is only ok if the caller specified that, which means we need to split the annotations into interruptible and non-interruptible version. If we then make sure that we only use interruptible dma_fence_wait() calls while holding drm_modeset_lock we can grab them in tdr code, and allow display resets. Doing the same for dma_resv_lock might be a lot harder, so buffer updates must be avoided. What's worse, we're not going to be able to make the dma_fence_wait calls in mmu-notifiers interruptible, that doesn't work. So allocating memory still wont' be allowed, even in tdr sections. Plus obviously we can use this trick only in tdr, it is rather intrusive. Cc: linux-media(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig(a)lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx(a)lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris(a)chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter(a)intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c index 52f1ab4bc922..a1c091e11ffd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c @@ -281,9 +281,12 @@ static void drm_sched_job_timedout(struct work_struct *work) { struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched; struct drm_sched_job *job; + bool fence_cookie; sched = container_of(work, struct drm_gpu_scheduler, work_tdr.work); + fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling(); + /* Protects against concurrent deletion in drm_sched_get_cleanup_job */ spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock); job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->ring_mirror_list, @@ -315,6 +318,8 @@ static void drm_sched_job_timedout(struct work_struct *work) spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock); drm_sched_start_timeout(sched); spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock); + + dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie); } /** -- 2.27.0

4 years, 12 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig