On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:53PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:12:22PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
On 16 March 2012 23:23, Dave Airlie airlied@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Rob Clark rob.clark@linaro.org wrote:
From: Rob Clark rob@ti.com
Works in a similar way to get_file(), and is needed in cases such as when the exporter needs to also keep a reference to the dmabuf (that is later released with a dma_buf_put()), and possibly other similar cases.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark rob@ti.com
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie airlied@redhat.com
Thanks; pulled into for-next.
I'm back from vacation and already grumpily complaining about dma-buf patches ;-) For consistency with dma_buf_put we should call this dma_buf_get instead of get_dma_buf ... I'll write a bikeshed patch on top of your tree.
Oops, there's already a dma_buf_get around - Rob and Dave pointed that out on irc to dense me. And I can't come up with a saner naming scheme. I'll retract my bikeshed. -Daniel