On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Marcus Lorentzon marcus.xm.lorentzon@stericsson.com wrote:
Am I right if I say GEM only have 3 standard ioctls, FLINK, OPEN, CLOSE? If so, a second implementation/variation of "GEM API" could use the same namespace for FLINK names across devices and still be called GEM? Just probing GEM ground to see what could be "fixed" in GEM and what is written in stone.
It's even better, there's not even a generic open for gem objects ;-) Well, if you neglect the recently added dumb_create which is just to create a framebuffer for graphical boot splash screens and unusable for rendering.
Anyway, just a short reply, I'm a bit snowed under atm. I'll send out an overview of gem and how I think it could be integrated with the linaro wishlist after easter.
Cheers, Daniel