20 Nov
2012
20 Nov
'12
7:52 p.m.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:48:44 +0100 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com wrote:
As this patch is already in -next and is stuck there for two more weeks I can't (or at least won't) merge this patch, so I can't help with any of the above.
I will fix both issues in the next version of the patch. Would like to merge it to your tree or should I keep it in my dma-mapping tree?
The patch looks OK to me now (still wondering about the -stable question though).
It would be a bit of a pain for me to carry a patch which conflicts with one in linux-next, and this patch doesn't appear to conflict with the other pending dmapool.c patches in -mm so you may as well keep it in the dma-mapping tree now.